You have described the foolishness of industrialists who claim pollutants they dump into our living quarters are harmless, but do not mention the ludicrous claims of academics, pontificating from their ivory towers, divorced from reality.

I see them as one and the same, cut from the same cloth.

Consider the hasty changes in terminology when discussing global pollution.

I think this was engineered

First, it was global warming that was to melt the glaciers and drown coastal cities within 10-years with sea water. Then, the term conveniently morphed to climate change when the fluctuations in global temperatures did to concord with their apocalyptic hypothesis.

The game is played without consideration of the board, or other players.

very existence produces the pollitant the academics so dread, carbon dioxide,

this is only one facet of the argument.

You seem very bitter these days, even more so than normal. You okay?