The Idea Economy is coming... are you ready?

in #economy7 years ago (edited)

You might have noticed that the economy looks different for a lot of us. A lot of people are upset that they can't count on their old recipes anymore. What previously was considered a "good job" or a prosperous region has been slowly but surely been losing its attractiveness, and more and more people are disenchanted with their job and career.

So you might say it is time to upgrade our thinking:

brain.jpg
Stock pic: rights owned by me.

1) Economy Transformation

“Every few hundred years throughout Western history, a sharp transformation has occurred,”
Peter Drucker observed in a 1992 essay for Harvard Business Review.
“In a matter of decades, society altogether rearranges itself – its worldview, its basic values, its social and political structures, its arts, its key institutions.
Fifty years later a new world exists. And the people born into that world cannot even imagine the world in which their grandparents lived and into which their own parents were born.
Our age is such a period of transformation.”
For Drucker, the newest new world was marked, above all, by one dominant factor: “the shift to a knowledge society.”

From https://hbr.org/2014/10/what-peter-drucker-knew-about-2020

Drucker already was talking about the knowledge economy in 1969.
He was then talking about the shift from "factory work" to "paper work".
Like the shift from Agrarian economies to industrial economies, there was a shift of economic opportunities in the last 50 years.
While most people assume we are still in the knowledge economy, it looks like we have shifted to a different version which one might call the Idea Economy.
Finance-Calculation-Calculator-Insurance-Accounting-385506.jpg Pic source

The shift to the knowledge economy was hard on factory workers in the developed world.
The developing world was able to take advantage but there to these factors will shift the things that matter, maybe even faster.
Because they are going through this shift in an era of exponential technological progress.

The shift from the knowledge economy to the idea economy is going to be equally hard on many types of “white collar” workers.
Certain types of “good jobs” are already quickly being automated, outsourced or lose their value because of abundance due to exponential technological progress.

As I wrote about in my article about checking your assumptions, this means that the old recipes for “a successful life” and the formula for earning a decent income will seem to stop working for more and more people.

With this post I want to explain the reason WHY those recipes stopped working.

Overall, I want to hit the right tone with this article and show you that:

  1. Things are changing (have been changing for a while)
  2. It will impact ALL your assumptions about how you will make a decent living
  3. I think the switch will be brutal for many people.
  4. If you understand the new rules of the IDEA economy, the opportunities are huge. Especially if you are an early adopter on platforms like steemit.com :)

Transitions between economies

The first place to start is maybe this awesome graph from http://bigpictureguy.com/wordpress/why-innovate/idea-economy/

idea_economy.jpg

As you can see here, throughout human history, we have made several step changes in the way we as humans have been able to "make a living" on our planet.

Then with the invention of the steam engine, we saw a huge multiplier effect where now it was possible on a large scale to use machine power to replace muscle power...
Not only to work the land, it was now also possible to automate all kinds of manual actions so the output of "stuff" was getting huge.
Transportation especially was a game changer because it made previously scarce resources and manufactured goods much more accessible and cheap.
Fast forward 200 years and we obtained huge improvements in standard of living overall.
The nature of “work” and what type of job is well rewarded has been shifting though.
In the beginning of the industrial age, most people made their income from extracting raw materials or making stuff in factories.

Miners, factory workers were the backbone of many communities.
But as technology got better and better at replacing muscle power, less and less people were involved in those sectors.

As capital and manufacturing expertise turn out to be fairly mobile together with transportation efficiencies it made these kinds of jobs outsourceable. As a result whole communities suffered. Many people were stuck there because of home ownership. With the deteriorating economic conditions, their once valuable housing dropped in value and they can't afford to move to areas with better jobs.

All along, the ideal was to escape the blue collar job and become a white collar worker.
A new type of worker emerged in the middle of all this: "the knowledge worker".
You may have noticed that the people who did best the last few decades, tended to be not the people making stuff, but the people who are involved with moving information around:

Knowledge worker according to wikipedia:
Knowledge workers are workers whose main capital is knowledge.
Examples include software engineers, physicians, pharmacists, architects, engineers, scientists, design thinkers, public accountants, lawyers, and academics, and any other white-collar worker, whose line of work requires the one to "think for a living".[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_worker#Definition

So the standard answer for those that wanted a good income has been "go to college" and "get a good job".
But as I wrote in my "Checking your assumptions" article, there seems to be a growing realization that this "formula for success" is tapped out. See how many baristas in your Starbucks have a college degree? They tried that formula and failed.

**Why is that? **
Dan Pink explains this well:


Thanks to Youtuber Brianna Crowley for the edit.

What it comes down to is that certain types of knowledge work which depend on logical, linear, analytical thinking are actually easiest to hand over to computers.
A lot of that kind of work is either automate-able by software or outsource-able to those developing countries with literally millions of knowledge workers graduating every year.
Or it completely loses value because information and knowledge has become abundant.

2) You need to adjust your assumptions about how life works

Another great graph from http://bigpictureguy.com/wordpress/why-innovate/idea-economy/

economic_priorities.jpg

Things keep shifting. What matters in the economy keeps shifting.

  • For the Agrarian Economy you needed land + animals + people. Work the land and defend it against other people trying to steal it.

  • In the industrial and market economy you needed Capital to buy machines + raw materials + energy + people. Most of all you needed intellectual capital and needed to defend that (e.g. patents, brand, keeping your most talented people from going to work for the competition)

  • Now we are coming up to the idea economy, which again is going to shift what matters.
    Making generic manufactured goods has ceased to be an economic opportunity, for many people.
    everything can and will be copied and margins will keep dropping on most consumer goods.
    What matters most is, you guessed it... ideas.
    Creating whole new ways of solving problems, products, services etc.
    In Big picture guy’s words:
    In today’s new economy Ideas are the critical determinant of opportunity. The ability to produce standardized products year after year, the bulwark of a mass market economy, is inconsequential in an environment where production and distribution have become commodified and commonplace. It is the idea and the ability to execute it with agility that delivers economic value.

What will stop mattering in the near future?

These forces of Outsourcing, Automation and Abundance are irreversible.

As a knowledge professional, trying to hold on to the old ways you earned an income is going to be more and more a losing proposition.
Playing by the old rules is increasingly going to stop working.
Unfortunately many people resist change, they are uncomfortable with giving up something they know
(although it is visibly deteriorating) than trying something that is uncertain.

Kevin Kelly sums it up like this :
If your job consist of finding the right answer, or if it can be measured in terms of productivity (how many x/ hour) sooner or later it will be automated.

From : http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/will-a-robot-take-your-job
People have lost their jobs before, and everything turned out fine:
Two hundred years ago, 70 percent of American workers lived on the farm. Today automation has eliminated all but 1 percent of their jobs, replacing them (and their work animals) with machines. But the displaced workers did not sit idle. Instead, automation created hundreds of millions of jobs in entirely new fields.
If history repeats itself, robots will replace our current jobs, but, says Kelly, we’ll have new jobs, that we can scarcely imagine:
In the coming years robot-driven cars and trucks will become ubiquitous; this automation will spawn the new human occupation of trip optimizer, a person who tweaks the traffic system for optimal energy and time usage. Routine robosurgery will necessitate the new skills of keeping machines sterile. When automatic self-tracking of all your activities becomes the normal thing to do, a new breed of professional analysts will arise to help you make sense of the data.

Success in the future will be about doing things, that can't be automated, outsourced or which are not abundant.
What will stop mattering is what you know, or what your college degree says you are supposed to know.
Doesn't matter. It is obsolete and abundant.
What companies want to know is, what can you do with what you know?
Can you create? Come up with good questions? Can you collaborate with a global virtual team? Can you access and learn new information and incorporate that in your new projects. Are you techno literate? Can you solve problems creatively? Are you good at human relationships with co-workers, suppliers and clients.

3) The transition will be brutal for people doubling down on old formulas

2098799175_0a3b39c088.jpg
Pic source
Young people will still plonk down insane amounts of money for a college degree, which only prepares you for those kinds of jobs that are in the line of fire.
Older people will still borrow insane amounts of money to buy houses they don’t really need, betting that they will keep earning the same wage or better and won’t lose their job.

Money they borrowed and have little chance of ever paying off.

These forces are flipping things upside down, what were pretty reliable formulas before, now stopped working.
Paths that before looked pretty uncertain now are becoming more and more viable.
(There are kids making a career off playing videogames on youtube, go figure..., how many parents are undermined by that "you won't ever achieve anything if you keep playing games!" "But mom ...")

I talk about this in my article about checking your assumptions:
https://steemit.com/life/@the-traveller/idea-economy-mental-models-checking-your-assumptions

Basically it comes down to this: Professionals which are going to try to outdo a computer or outwork a few million eager professionals in developing countries have little chance of success. Success not meaning millions but simply a decent income.

4) It’s not all bad, in fact it can be great!


Pic source
Where there is risk, there is opportunity. Rather than losing a piece of the pie to AI, Automation etc., the pie will get exponentially bigger.
If you can look ahead a bit and see where things are going, in fact there are great opportunities:
No longer do you need access to massive capital to realize ideas. I know people who have started their won pet product lines with a few thousand dollar.
All it takes is an idea, applying the new tools from the new economy and start experimenting.

Don't fear the AI, it’s going to mostly take over parts of your job you hate anyway

The much dreaded AI in fact presents huge opportunities.
Entire new industries will be created from taking existing things and “cognifying” it as Kevin Kelly calls it.

Much can be learned from the story of Garry Kasparov.
In 1997 he was world champion, went up against IBM’s Big Blue at chess and lost. Most people think that is where it ended…
Obviously if he would have kept playing against the computer with the same rules he would have kept losing.
So he changed the rules...
If the computer had access to all historic chess moves ever made, he figured he should have the same access to a similar database.
So he started to hold freestyle chess matches where anything goes.
People teamed up against computers, computers vs computers and teams of humans with computers (called centaurs) against computers.
Interestingly the most successful teams seemed to be the centaurs. People teaming up with AI.

More interestingly, rather than being the end of chess, it elevated the whole game to an entire new level. Because computer programs enabled top players to get much more and excellent practice against computers, the human vs human games increased as well.

**I think this is showing where the rest of the economy is going too: **
Humans, using technology to do the heavy lifting, the boring repetitive stuff which will allowing them to focus on what makes them uniquely human.
If you think about it, it was ever thus.
With the advent of tractors, the answer was not to try to outwork a tractor plowing a field. That is obviously impossible.
The modern farmer replaced humans with technology.

In the face of AI and outsourced knowledge work, the answer is not doubling down on trying to outwork the automation.
It is to focus on those areas which are uniquely human and which can’t be outsourced, automated and which are not abundant.

As Dan Pink points out, it will force us to focus on that what makes us human.
The creative side (expressed in many areas not just art), relationship side, exploration and investigative side.
Kevin Kelly says: The jobs of the future will be about finding better questions, something computers can’t do.

Don’t believe this crap that there are no jobs and AI is going to take away everything

If you have a blue collar job and do manual labor I don’t think you are necessarily screwed.
All this technology breaks down. There are in fact many essential maintenance jobs that are not being filled (I am not talking janitors here, real wrench-in-hand jobs).
Aviation in particular is heading for a huge crunch because a huge part of the engineer population (proper engineers who get their hands dirty, not the keyboard jockeys :) ) is retiring soon and it takes a lot of time to train a new engineer.
Much longer than pilots in fact. Pilots will lose their jobs to automation loooong before aviation maintenance engineers do.
Mike Rowe makes an excellent case for the profound disconnect between the real jobs that are out there and the qualified people that are missing to fill these jobs. http://profoundlydisconnected.com/

I know several companies that are unable to expand because they lack certain types of people that can do certain kinds of metalwork for instance. They’d pay fortunes for qualified people but can’t find qualified people so they have to train them themselves: https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/jun/22/skills-gap-small-business-qualified-staff

Manufacturing is not dead, it is very much alive. The tools of production and design process are going to be very different though.
Mass production will be less and less rewarding. You do need to realize that mass production is not a game that will go well for you long term. But there are a LOT of things to do outside traditional manufacturing, that can be very lucrative.

Creating new and unique stuff, making custom solutions, troubleshooting and repairing technology will be very important.
3 D printing and custom producing solutions that solve very specific problems are going to be hugely important.
Open source hardware like Arduino can allow a clever chap make automated solutions for small businesses now that even huge companies could only have dreamed about 15 years ago. Custom is the way to go.
In fact more lucrative than some white collar jobs because certain categories of jobs can’t be done through a telephone or an Internet line.

For white collar jobs, yes a lot of them will disappear. But is that a bad thing? A lot of these jobs are boring and mind numbing anyway. People will have to move their backsides but those that take a Kasparov-like strategy of “if you can’t beat them, join ‘em” will reap huge rewards.

Again generic work will not be rewarded, if your job can be described in how many forms you process a day, guess what… there’s an app for that…so if you are the first to automate your own job away, you can have a great income, without having to do so much. That’s leverage.

If you can’t or won’t do that, you need to figure out which parts of your job you can become more creative: people person?
Focus on that, personalized services, custom work, go out to the customer and learn about their company.
Business person? Figure out new models around these new ways of working, find a common problem solve it and automate the solution. Plenty of professionals available to help you with the tech side.

More person to person work e.g. is to focus on coaching specific skills you take for granted.
You’d be surprised how many young people have actually no social or person to person skills for instance.

handshake-1513228_960_720.jpg

Pic source
A huge problem is demographics, social care and elderly care and all services around that are going to get huge with few people specialized in that.
Have grandparents that you help a lot? Found cool optimizations that work especially well for them and their situation?
Congratulations, you have a job for the foreseeable future.

The whole technology side of life is exploding, with the consequence that people will need a digital designer for their life (much like an interior decorator). A subsector of that will be personal digital security, plugging vulnerabilities in people's digital lives. That will be huge.

In short, 80 % of the jobs in the next 15 years have probably not been invented yet. So I would not worry too much about there not being many jobs left.
There will NOT be many OLD jobs left, that’s pretty sure. But I think there will be plenty stuff to do.
What you need to avoid is getting caught in this transition without a plan…

An Action plan, to adapt to the idea economy: based on my previous posts:

act action changes things.jpg

Pic is stock, rights owned by me.

The first step is to get familiar and experiment with new technology and see what it can do.
You need to become techno-literate so that you create a healthy relationship with technology.

Then it will greatly help you to figure out where you can leverage technology in life to increase your per hour output.

Up until this point I would not do anything drastic yet about changing your Knowledge economy job, first you need to learn:
In order to do that, you need to take responsibility for your learning, the education system is obviously screwed and won’t help you with this.


Pic source
What are you doing about your learnin’?

Now comes the difficult part:
Change:
Recognizing situations where it is necessary or advantageous to change is a skill in itself.
But in an ever changing world it will be a necessity.
One of the new rules of the new economy is to let go at the top

6) Let Go at the Top. As innovation accelerates, abandoning the highly successful in order to escape from its eventual obsolescence becomes the most difficult and yet most essential task.

It is not because you change that you will be good at it, another skill you need to master is experimentation. But that’s an article for the next time.

This post is part of my JULY EXPERIMENT: I share ALL SBD's earned from this post with:

1 quality commenter

1 Re-steemer (that gives me a good reason why they are re-steeming)

See here why

What else am I missing with this article, agree? Don’t agree?

I would love to have your comment, maybe you can win some decent money. Anything thought provoking is great. Disagree, fantastic! Let me know! Have a question? Even better, a great question is sometimes better than a page long comment!

So please comment, question, challenge and RESTEEM to get as many people in the conversation as possible.

Sort:  

This makes a lot of sense. However, in a way I don't really see the difference between an adaptable knowledge worker and an "idea economy" worker. Or is it just that nowadays everyone already talks about adaptability and that being the most important thing and that people just didn't talk about that earlier.

I still feel that higher education is becoming more and more important, despite your impression that it is becoming less important. It might be that Finland is just so much ahead of the rest of the world that we are taught to think instead of cram. I've seen education as a tool to enable learning new things, as something that helps in learning the skills you actually need. The system has already changed from: "learn this, you'll become a..." to "learn this, you'll be able to learn how to learn in your profession". Only people who stop at early stages of education expect that they will be cutting wood or doing something similar till they die. The reason being, they've gone to school where they were taught that. The other path is to go to an upper secondary, which teaches you how to think (well most people don't understand it at that point, I did), then you go to university or other higher education, where you get a degree which will help you to learn in your actual profession or make you a researcher in your field.

I think this what the education system is for, but in America I know, they still believe that when you graduate to be something, that is what you are going to do. In Finland, you just want to graduate university, then you go do something that you want to. Unless, you study to be a doctor or something that needs highly specialized education to get a license.

Anyway, one shouldn't expect that they will be doing the same thing for the rest of their career. If they do, that was wrong already in the 60's. No one does what they did when they started, unless they are extremely "lucky". Some people might prefer that, personally I look towards new challenges all the time.

And I completely agree with the fact that automation isn't necessarily bad. It will probably just make people work in better jobs. Some won't be able to adapt, but that is just how it is.

Good catch! I did go to sleep thinking "I did not explain the difference very well did I ?"
But once you get to 02h00 it's probably time to go to sleep.

l think indeed Finnish education has blurred that line for you and it might have given you a different outlook because they indeed do things differently.
My experience is with education systems in Belgium, Spain and what I read about the US system, or Ted videos from ken Robinson.
All of these systems seem to focus mainly on transferring knowledge and figuring out the one right answer to the professors' question.
It is very focussed on compliance with authority. Basically styled on old Prussian military values .
Ironically the military this day and age seems to focus much more on the ability to individual problem solving and critical thinking.

I think this article from Tony Wagner sums it up well :
http://www.tonywagner.com/7-survival-skills
(suspicious there's always seven , but a good start...)

How does that translate into business life?
Say you are a banker, lawyer, accountant, civil engineer or doctor even... and most of your job consists of repetitive procedural work, filling out forms, doing the same steps over and over... then you are an overpaid human "computer".
Here in Spain, especially after the crisis, people have it in their head that the public sector jobs are safe. ( they spend years studying for entrance exams !) Because they saw after the 2008 crisis that private salaries went down 40-60% and most public sector workers were not affected.
But the public sector is basically bankrupt ! Most of these jobs are paper shuffling(very inefficiently l might add), stuff a 16 year old can write an app for.
Already you see some department getting privatised, guess what the first move is going to be?
I'll think up some more but I guess this needs to be my next article...

I've had education in other countries as well, but it might be that I've learned what to focus on in studying from the Finnish system. However, the situation is the same in Finland that people use many years to get to their choice of university. The average is 3 years before you get there. I heard that in Spain pretty much everyone gets to try university, but many loose their place when they don't perform. In Finland you just need to try entrance exams until you get in. I did not get in on my first try for example. That system is ridiculous, but I don't really know how it could be made better.

And I agree, some professions will just be filled with computers, because an AI can do excel faster. etc.

This presentation by Hans Rosling shows the result of the education system: We are basically very outdated in understanding our world: Not totally related but fun none the less:

Wow, that's a lot to unpack there. I tend to look at the emerging situation "added complication". What I mean is that every single job gets progressively more difficult. I remember my mother complaining about Excel being introduced into her workplace a couple of decades ago. It was one hell of a skill to learn - how to power up the PC and then Excel itself was no joke to use. Her story has a happy ending - now, retired, she keeps all her financial records in Excel, and having Office was the number one requirement when I was choosing a computer for her.

My point is, it is not easy to learn how to operate new machinery, how to utilize AI (not just at the technical level of proficiency, but, as you said, even at the level of application: how does it fit in your business?). You have to know more, and it's not about depth anymore, as it used to be, but more about width. You have numerous pieces in one large puzzle that you have to put together.

This has profound implications for education. Not only there is too much to potentially teach, the situation is further complicated by the fact that we have no idea what is going to happen in 5 years. Our education systems are what they are because they are lost. They are clueless because they cling onto the old philosophy behind education while realizing they have to teach towards new goals.

In my opinion, we can't have a curriculum oriented towards today because we know it won't help learners, but we always can't orient it towards tomorrow because we don't know what tomorrow is going to be like. What we can do, however, is to orient our children towards the only thing we know about the future - it is going to be unpredictable and volatile, but full of opportunities. This idea again goes back to the call of reorganizing schools around such goals as promotion of critical thinking and creativity, and less around the goals that teach knowledge that will likely be outdated by the time they leave school or graduate from university.

My 2 cents (literally, too =) )

The basic assumptions behind education will need be revised, that's for certain!
But at the same time education is a red herring in this story, it won't help the hundreds of millions of professional people adapt to these new realities : education simply does not have the tools to help people adapt. Education as it is conceived right now is to provide one-size-fits-all solutions. Its tools are rote memorisation, standardisation and indoctrination and its very structure was designed to prepare people to work in a factory ( the bell, disciplinary process, hierarchy )

The outcome of all that is, intended or not, obedient, conservative thinkers which have little self knowledge and who are very risk averse.
Changing merely the curriculum is choosing a more fancy color lipstick for the pig.

Should there we be a curriculum ? Should there be textbooks ? Should there be any teachers , if so what should their role be? Should we even have these expensive school buildings ? Could you decentralize schools? Use the money put into bricks , to develop minds by a community approach ?
Why do kids need to sit still ? Why do they need to be in a classroom paying attention to a teacher for an hour at a time ?

hmm getting lengthy , better turn this into a post ...

Excellent article, I will resteem. Why?

This article provides evidence that the biggest potential value of steemit is not necessarily the money you can make from authoring or curation.

The biggest value of steemit could turn out to be the value you take away from the ideas you can learn from steemit, and the interactions you can have with thoughtful people that have interesting ideas worth discussing.

Your article has ideas worth thinking about, that could (should?) be having some impact on everyone's life.

steemit could become "the place" to go, to get thoughtful articles of the type you wrote, covering an infinite number of topics.

Your article shows steemit could be "the place" to go to learn about new ideas

That is why I am resteeming.

STEEM On !!

Dave

p.s. as a corollary, not productive if we all aspire to become a steemit blogger who can post a few pictures of their trip to Bahamas and walk away with more than $1,000 every day. Aim higher. Aspire to be a blogger who can bring a couple of great new ideas to steemit for discussion every month

Hehe, that was one of my first articles on steemit. I explained more about how Steemit can be one of the first viable ways to live purely off your ideas:
https://steemit.com/introduceyourself/@the-traveller/the-reason-why-i-want-to-build-a-platform-on-steemit-and-why-you-should-too-the-idea-economy

The trick with this stuff is boiling down the messages. Blogging about it has helped enormously to structure my ideas better but I need to refine them further. Comments help me a lot to see if I am getting through or if my messages still are blurry... Thanks for the resteem ! Much appreciated!

Oh you are definitely getting through @the-traveller....I went back to one of your previous articles, titled, you need to become techno -literate and how we have to have an understanding of this so that we will not become obsolete (one of the things that concerns me also.) but in this previous article which like all of your articles is so well written, reading it I felt you were holding my hand through a new age, which is of course the idea economy. I will upvote and resteem this article and follow you. Thank you for taking me to school I needed this upgrade to keep pace with the dolphins and the whales in the near future. Wishing you much success @the-traveller

Thanks so much! As I explained in my article on steemit and the idea economy , my first concern is obviously figuring this out for myself. But as you so touchingly express, holding others' hands to help them through this transition is where I want to go.
Going from the "safe" corporate job to a different mode of life where you can create, solve problems and are not shackled to old ways of doing things.
Obviously that is not all rainbows and unicorns either . There is uncertainty but paradoxically less risk than sitting waiting in your proverbial cubicle until they figure out a way to automate or outsource your job.
In later articles l'll talk about specific strategies on how to start prepping for that day.

Congratulations @the-traveller! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of posts published

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

Great article! I find your section on AI particularly interesting. In my experience the tech that everyone was worried about 20 years ago hasn't necessarily replaced people in the workforce, but instead acted as a productivity multiplier. For example, a mechanic can now repair a car more effectively with better tools and secretaries didn't become obsolete when Microsoft Office became common in offices everywhere.

Exactly, just added a bit to say that yes the AI etc will take a piece of the pie, but the rest of the pie will get exponentially bigger.
The problem is in the transition, you can't outwork a computer, many people will try though! Once people understand the new rules, there is lots of stuff to do outside the old type jobs I think.

Re-steemed because AI still can not recognize an article with true human value yet. It can track how many humans have indicated that their is value in the article, but that is secondary and dependent on real humans recognizing value first.

Also, re-steemed because this is the type of info that has the potential to save lives.

Steem-on!

Thanks so much for the comments ! I do take that seriously :

Also, re-steemed because this is the type of info that has the potential to save lives.

These are indeed powerful themes that touch many lives. In Belgium we have seen how transitions like these can indeed wreck lives. Where l grew up they closed the coal mines in the '80s and there were whole parts of the population left sitting idle. In some parts there is generational unemployment, whole communities which are largely unproductive till this day.
I highly respect techno optimists like Diamandis & co for pointing out the upside which no doubt can be good, but it always bothered me that they gloss over the upheaval and turmoil the transition can create. I'd like to explore here on Steemit what we can DO and which lessons we can share with people who are willing to adapt.

These forces of Outsourcing, Automation and Abundance are irreversible.

Indeed. Tough times at first for the transition of workers, but down the line it should mean more abundance for all.

Humans, using technology to do the heavy lifting, the boring repetitive stuff which will allowing them to focus on what makes them uniquely human.
If you think about it, it was ever thus.

Yeah, that's the ideal we should go towards. There's always that worry about tech/AI going bad by someone's hands hehe.

I agree on the many useless jobs that will be good to be gone just because they fill in economic survability niches.

But I find it sad that each level decreases the monetary value of those still doing work, like people who farm crops. They provide the food for our lives and yet they are hardly given any notice in our lives for their importance. Can automation fully replace those people? But it's always the mind jobs that will be worth more since it requires more to figure things out like complex situations of life, as opposed to more automated robotic repetition of doing something. I suppose it is indeed inevitable to come about as a natural progression. Good post, 100% vote worthy, and resteemed. These are good things for people to think about. You did a great job explaining the shift.

thanks! it helped enormously to begin posting on Steem. this stuff has been rattling around in my head a few years ever since I read several books on the subject... Now writing it all down helps to structure and polish the ideas, but there is a lot to go through.
It is one of those things I haven't been able to shake off, so I guess the thing to do is to develop further and see where it goes!

I love to wrap it up this way.

What matters to us in the meantime:

We used to talk openly about how our life works. I think now we do need to adjust these assumptions on how our life actually works after the wave of new revolution is upcoming.

It is sure that countries are working on agricultural and industrial economies for centuries. The next big thing is already in place. The question is, are you ready for it?

This current next big thing may revolve around your ability to coin exceptional ideas and creating value. It is also vital that each in such idea economy needs to understand customers and how well each can execute its complexity. We do need collaborations for a start. Importantly, we need to understand the concept of change. Who wants change? Who wants to lead the change? & Who wants to change.

#on5whs #onideaeconomy

no problem! If you look at Steemit in view of these ideas, you can see how powerful it really is, it could be one of the places where the idea economy grows up! In a sense Steemit.com already IS a literal idea driven economy...

sounds excellent, can't seem to find the post it is from, the tags don't show up for me, really interested in reading that article! would you mind
putting in the link to the article please?

Hi dear. These tags are of my thoughts on relevant topics, but not specifically related to it. Every now and then I sum up ideas and tag #. I do love your writing here and it is the big think forward. It is relevant to the current situation. Things like Steemit is where ideas count. Someone like you might make it move realistically.
Regards.

I agree that AI will not take every job and cannot do everything that humans do. A question that does come into mind is which percentage of the population can connect to the idea economy, which requires a much more active mindset of people than a regular worker. Not everyone is able to be his own boss. I guess that is part of where the call for a universal income comes from. I would rather want to see that abundance is to such extent that also people in the lower bound can easily cope.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.21
TRX 0.20
JST 0.034
BTC 99341.76
ETH 3285.44
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.05