Nice presentation of the theory. As an older guy who was once a believer in the assumption of State I start my thinking at a different point. To me the idea of consent is misused and manipulative as used by the State. For me personally I do not agree that vaild and true consent can be given without complete disclosure and complete compreshesion. If fear or ignorance is employed there is no valid consent. Implied consent, in my opinion, is a legal fiction used in the corporate paper world to mitigate the liability of the human actors. Each human should stand in 100 percent liability of the harm they may do to others. This is especially true of those who sell themselves as "public servants." They should be held at an even higher standard and should be publically executed for violation of public trust if they do not make correction and recompense. That reality might incentivise better decision making on their part. :) "Government" should only serve a service function in trust with the people and prosper only in relation to the least of the real inhabitants of the land. At present in the US children are required by the State to undergo 12 years of programming that only serves the state. There can be no consent without comprehension. Everyone should function in 100 percent liability of their actions. Especially those who do great harm while hiding within the corporate fictions. Just an old dude talking out loud. Peace.