Is the American Dream Dying?
The American dream probably means something slightly different to each of us, but one way of measuring it objectively is whether each generation earns more than the previous one. In "For many people, the American dream has been vanishing" Tyler Cowen highlights recent research that shows the American dream might be taking a break.
About 92 percent of 1940 babies had higher pretax household earnings at age 30 than their parents had at the same age. (The results were similar at older ages and for post-tax earnings.)…
For babies born in 1980 — today’s 36-year-olds — the index of the American dream has fallen to 50 percent: Only half of them make as much money as their parents did.
There has been a steady decline for the last five decades:
Any takers as to why? Is this just a natural decline or is there something else going on?
What are your thoughts?
If you like this post, please upvote, resteem, or share below! Please check out my other articles and follow @finpunk to keep in touch with future content.
Rob Viglione is a PhD Candidate in Finance @UofSC with research interests in cryptofinance, asset pricing, and innovation. He is a former physicist, mercenary mathematician, and military officer with experience in satellite radar, space launch vehicles, and combat support intelligence. Currently a Principal at Key Force Consulting, LLC, a start-up consulting group in North Carolina, and Head of U.S. & Canada Ambassadors @BlockPay, Rob holds an MBA in Finance & Marketing and the PMP certification. He is a passionate libertarian who advocates peace, freedom, and respect for individual life.
Image source: https://www.theatlantic.com/projects/american-dreams/
Already gone.
I think it seems it is over for everyone in the Western world but I also think it is the natural cycle of things.
It is depressing but there is always the possibility of something better emerging from the crisis.
I don't think the basic aspirations and ideals of the "american" dream will ever die - I think they are fundamental to human nature.
I agree, the ideals of the "American Dream" will never die; people will always naturally want to better their situations, as well as see their kids do even better.
If political economy is included in the "natural cycle of things," then, sure, this is probably just part of the lifecycle of civilizations. However, sclerotic growth need not happen...it's possible to relax economic micromanagement and accelerate innovation, productivity, and all that good stuff that makes us wealthier...
That may happen too. I think with crisis and decline there is always the possibility for a new way to take hold.
Absolutely, which is why it's so important to frame the debate productively pre-crisis to ensure our lives aren't simply hijacked by opportunistic politicians promising their usual snake oil that'll just make things worse.
Yes:)
yup. dead and gone, and it wont come back until enough bad stuff happens in the world that we start actually working together again
or, IMO, when the world migrates back to pro-growth policies and countries stop trying to micromanage every aspect of economic life, taxing what remains.
On the optimistic side, I reeeaaaaally hope we can start colonizing the moon/mars before we get too Deus-Ex or Fallouty on Earth.
Places to expand into ho!
Ha! Totally agree...time to start launching some colonists :)
You know why it is called the American Dream right? Because you have to be asleep to believe it.. Fortunately even more so today than ever before, that chart is a choice not a destiny.
Agreed, nothing is given to us, there's still a ton of opportunity for people to make their own destiny.
You pose a challenging question which however to my mind reaches far beyond the American dream. Just about every country in the world seems to be going through some new-type crisis which nobody seems to have got a grip on yet. Perhaps the American dream is just being subjected to the global changes that are so substantially brought upon us by the dazzling technological advances of our era.
Great point that slowing growth is not just an American phenomenon! That should be at the focal point of the discussion.
I've never seen evidence that tech innovation slows growth, though. The tried and true methods for slowing growth are reductions in economic freedom, which seems to be a problem common to many countries at the moment. Unfortunately, popular prescriptions for declining growth are to further reduce economic freedom...a counterproductive process.
Thank the ever-expanding God State for that. He (and his bureaucratic minions) taken up so much room in our lives that Millenials like me have a hard time making a living. Now, 1/3 of all jobs require some sort of licensing and not everyone has the means (nor the time) to pursue these privileges to work.
I know, it's ridiculous when you take a step back and realize how much of economic life is dominated outright, controlled, or distorted by governments.
This is a complex subject, but basically it boils down to there being more hidden taxes in the system, then our increase in production ability.
We have entered the hockystick end of the inflation dynamic. (See the nonFederal no-Reserve Bankcartel)
We have entered the era of bureaucracy having eaten all the surplus. Surplus is where we get future capital from. Without surplus, we cannot even maintain what we have.
We have run into higher energy costs. It used to be really easy to pump oil. For 1 barrel of oil in energy, you got 100 barrels of oil out of the ground. Now we are down to 1 for 10, and lower.
We have computerized/mechanized enough of the jobs. We now have a serious surplus of labor. The low skill labor positions, it is an estimate that there are two people for every job. However, at the top 5% of the employment market, there is two people for every three jobs.
Add all of these up, and we are actually imploding.
you're right, it is complex. Thanks for chiming in with the inflation, bureaucracy, energy, and automation issues...these are all important topics in and of themselves. i'm more concerned with bad management of the money supply (monopolization and perpetual inflation) and the crowding out of productive activities by the bureaucracy.
Interesting point re: the differences in supply/demand on the two ends of the labor spectrum...