Monitoring to fuel machine-learning models is the future

If we owned all our information, we would have agency over our data and essentially our own health. The reason blockchain makes that possible is that we can have decent data that may also be trusted. The blockchain is an immutable database and has other features, like being able to have digitally signed attestations about us. Those two things have the ability for people to keep their data but also have that information be trusted by others.
The most interesting feature of blockchain in the health sector is the ability of patients to own and control their own health information.

The system we outlined was to use Ethereum applications -- that, unlike Bitcoin, can integrate and implement wise contracts -- to build a private blockchain, linking healthcare providers together and permitting them to share their data.
Medically, you could just move to a new city and need to give your new doctor access to your medical history, or maybe you need to nominate a health care proxy in case of emergency or have your prescription sent to your pharmacy.
Nice thing about medical records is there is no Facebook for medical records yet, so perhaps we could, in a timely way, do what we’re doing, which is a universal, open, noncommercial layout -- almost like were designing a web and HTML for medical records.

All this information was linked to an identity individual's control; they can decide who gets to see what. Maybe a knee specialist doesn't require access your sexual health history. Blockchain could allow for this level of personal control. Second, it executes the patient's directions as and when needed, sending information to a pharmacy or a specialist for referral -- assuming the patient gives their approval. Third, the module allocates computing resources to preserving the blockchain.

Monitoring to fuel machine-learning models is the future. And those models will identify robust patterns that say, should you do this in your twenties, here's the effect in your fifties, so you don't wish to do that. Because right now it's like, ‘I will do what I like now and worry about it when I go and see the physician, but really my doctor is responsible for my health.'

In the United States, healthcare comes from a patchwork of private businesses, which means the handling of patient information is even more fragmented. Some say it’s an advantage: “Distribution makes the system more secure, because there is not a single place of failure or attack," Lippmann says.
I am not necessarily talking about all the ins and outs of data when you went to a hospital. I'm talking about your genome, your nutrition, and your fitness data. Your micro biome. All These things are important to maximizing your health over long periods of time, and yet we do not track them
Web 2.0 is when a central authority basically tracks you, uses that data to help you -- and also monetizes that data for them by essentially leasing the calculations which result from it to advertisers. All the Internet 2.0 giants do that; that is their business model. So Web 3.0 is: Now we have our information, we have agency over it, and we want permission for others to see it.

This blockchain, every one of these such directions by a patient produces a specific smart contract on the blockchain that only the patient can cryptographically sign.

The idea was that it has to start with providers conduct a program module on their computer to access the database, as instructed by the intelligent contracts, which can be initiated by the individual.

referral link https://t.me/DxChainBot?start=jt8dya-jt8dya and DxChain’s website https://www.dxchain.com/