Mainframe and Mini Computing
Mainframe and mini computing utilize the centralized model where the dispersed dumb terminals offer I/O, but computing tools and applications are centralized. By virtue of this, both standalone and networked architectures in the kind of client/server and peer-to-peer software were embraced. Then came the Internet technologies of the'90s, which made it feasible to deploy the server applications in 1 spot and Internet clients were set up as needed in remote, dispersed places. This brought back the centralized version again that's still continued today via the cloud. There have been primarily two versions which have been playing out rather since the mainframe was introduced into the business world.
Cloud computing has helped start, grow and alter several organizations across many business segments contributing significantly to global economic growth. One of the important areas that cloud computing expansion and adoption is large data. No blockchain currently intends to accommodate enormous information and this is where DXChain intends to create an impact. Substantial data has helped derive insights from enormous data (with quantity, variety and speed ) sources that are both structured and unstructured, and much more data resources are being added at a much faster rate daily during the rapid adoption of IoT. Adding the decentralized model as a separate offering to tackle machine and dispersed data needs won't only be expensive but also be very challenging for cloud sellers. It will require embeddable or separate border resources (hardware and software) distributed with seamless interconnection with one another.
There are billions of links, and all of these are linked to cloud backbone for bigger offline data processing. And I think today's cloud models will continue to evolve with more innovation to build on the cloud models for human-centric applications, but it'll be interesting to see how things will play out later on. There are other emerging regions popping up everywhere like cryptocurrencies, the machine market (i.e., a blend of IoT and cryptocurrencies), distributed applications such as Ethereum DApps plus a whole slew of peer-to-peer applications. However, the majority of these emerging areas need a computing model that is apparently incompatible with the present cloud compute model.
Can cloud suppliers do something about this incompatibility and change the cloud to offer comprehensive services in the future, or will they fall prey to disturbance? My view on the debate concerning whether machines will take over people is the fact that it's absurd. If we built AI properly, then the machines will know that coexistence and peace is the ideal way and will figure out ways to accomplish this by directing humans and not attempt and take over the world. With the recent advancements we've made in machine learning, it is clear now more than ever before that AI will play a vital role in the development of humanity. Now is about the time that we ought to begin inventing to machine intelligence by building and positioning our calculate models that could recognize the requirements of machines as a separate and essential element. This means we should expect to see both centralized and decentralized models (and some other future versions) to live and coexist to function dedicated purposes seamlessly. I feel that the cloud model works well for human-centric use and the decentralized model for machines and distributed data applications.
Referral Link - https://t.me/DxChainBot?start=k5udb0-k5udb0
DxChain's website - https://www.dxchain.com
✅ @alejandromanalo, I gave you an upvote on your post! Please give me a follow and I will give you a follow in return and possible future votes!
Thank you in advance!
Congratulations @alejandromanalo! You received a personal award!
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!