You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: New Scientist Magazine Calls for Compulsory Vaccinations
I believe the term in question is coincidence... Anyway, vaccines are simply another subject of great polarization for the people. Divide and conquer
I'd say it's another misinformation campaigns to trick us.
As far as offending you, you are hurting people if you believe and spread the message of the anti-vaxxers. ✌️
Posted using Partiko Android
https://www.coreysdigs.com/vaccines-pharmaceuticals/measles-masterminds-millions-part-ii/
Yah looks like a super reliable source.
Your mind is locked up... I pray you are able to have an open mind one day and question authority/think for yourself. Be safe out there
Show me facts and I'm happy to change it. When 99.99999% of scienctists agree with me though. I think you are the one who cannot change their mind. Send me facts and I will change mine, I did it with gun rights years ago, cannabis regulations, and many more in the past friend.
I could easily say the same thing about those pushing vaccines... Vaccines hurt children. Paralyze, create chronic sicknesses, weakened immune systems long term and kill. Those are facts. Look in to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
NVIC is a solid source of info on vaccines you may want to research: https://www.nvic.org/
This website looks reliable at face value at least! I'll look into it what they have to say.
They get great reviews,
"In review, the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is a quackery level anti-vaccination organization. The entire premise of the website is to encourage parents and adults not to vaccinate due to perceived dangers that are not accepted by science, as well as promoting propaganda campaigns such as displaying billboards along highways. Further, NVIC also claims a partnership with known pseudoscience purveyor, Joseph Mercola. This source also promotes the debunked claim that vaccines cause autism.
Overall, this is a quackery level pseudoscience website that promotes dangerous information that is not scientifically backed. (D. Van Zandt 9/18/2018) Updated (3/16/2019)"
I'm officially done arguing <3 we've walked in circles and have no basis in logic so there is no point.
The science would disagree with you on this point tho. Watch the video I posted in my original note please.
Posted using Partiko Android