You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: How do you determine which games to buy?

in #dpoll5 years ago

Voted for

  • Streamers/YouTube personalities
  • Self-discovery
  • Randomly landed on games
  • Other (please specify)

It's a little tricky with "Remastered versions of previous titles".

In general, I don't do that, I don't know why, really. For example, the FF7. I bought, played, and still own the very first version that was released for PCs, I even had to upgrade my PC back then because it ran so F* slow that when some in-game movie was played, like the (sic!) opening "train" movie, or when some richer animation (the summons, etc) was played, the game looked like a slideshow and music played several looped notes for a few second, then next several notes looped for a few seconds and so on. Nevermind. What I wanted to say, I played "the original", and it was great. Then I replayed the original on a more-modern computer, and it was ... uh ridiculously quality in many aspects. And paradoxically, most of the bad reception I got was not from the fact that the game, I dont know, "changed" it self, or not that it was really bad, etc, it was that the game did not make the same fun as when I played as a kid. Time did its "damage" and my expectation rose over those years, but also memories play role: the same scenes/plot/mechanics are now nothing new to me, and what was great now is just plain. When I look now at remastered-FF7 versions, heh, I still remember the original and how cool/great it was, and I completely don't remember the "let's replay it on modern machine" failure. I somewhat don't want to end up with similar feeling. I'm not afraid of being disappointed, etc, but it's just waste of time/money.

So what's tricky here? It sometimes happen that I find and play and like some game, only to later discover that this game was remastered version of some older original. I then simply can't hold back and must play the original. Now, that's a case! It's reverse "Remastered versions of previous titles". Like "Original versions of previous remastered titles". It happened a few times already, and I was really very positively surprised how well originals turned out compared to remastered ones.

Similar thing applies to "prequels/sequels". Let's say I got into FooBar-5, I often will also play in foobar-4, 3, 2, 1, and rarely -6. As a notable example, after playing FF7 and FF8 on PC, I think I played every single previous 'chapters' on SNES/etc, while I don't think I ever even saw FFXII or FFXIII.

Now writing this I feel like some retro-maniac, but looking at when I meticulously searched shops and the internet for all those old ones, while ignoring the new ones, I think the most important cause was ... the price. When I had tons of free time, I had no funds to be buying recently-published non-pirated games often. I could afford it once a year, maybe. In comparison, the same budgets allowed to buy/find/obtain 10-20 older games/roms/etc. Now situations's changed. I got some funds, I have no time to play ;)

Sort:  

That’s also assuming the remastered version is the exact same as the original, but with only graphics update.

For example, Resident Evil 2 remastered has some major differences compared to the original. Some of them being the camera angle and free range aim.

Yeah, that's right. Sometimes "remastered" is just about graphics and sound, and sometimes controls are diferent (which can make huge difference in gameplay quality) and sometimes it's like a total overhaul, with some features added/removed resulting in almost a new game, just looking similar. In the latter case, I wouldn't really consider it 'remastered', but rather, a new release, or huge service-pack/patch-pack, say i.e. FF7.02 :)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63361.04
ETH 2483.47
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.67