Telegram Responds to SEC: Gram Tokens Are Not Securities - CoinDesksteemCreated with Sketch.

in #dlike5 years ago (edited)

Shared From Dlike

SEC Showing Their Ability to Disrupt Innovation

In a disappointing move, the United States Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) made news this week by requested an injunction to the issuance of Telegram's ICO tokens (grams) for its upcoming TONS blockchain. This has been one of the high profile ICOs as it has become one of the largest ICOs ever after raising reportedly $1.7 billion. This was impressive as the ICO launched as the cryptocurrency market had already peaked and many other ICO projects never made it past funding and much less actually launching their projects.

The SEC stated that the issuance of the tokens, in their view, represents securities which would then lead for them to be in violation of the Securities Acts that establish key filing, process, and disclosure requirements for issuing Securities. Telegram states that they have entered into agreements with investors under the premise that the issuance complies with the exemptions offered under the same laws given the view that the token is not a security. I recalls seeing the whitepaper and the requirements to participate and it did seem that Telegram were being careful with the token issuance.

“Significantly, Telegram has already treated the Private Placement as a securities offering pursuant to valid exemptions to registration under the Securities Act of 1933. The grams themselves, as distinct from the purchase contracts, will merely be a currency or commodity (like gold, silver or sugar) — not a ‘security’ — once the TON Blockchain launches. “

This has also forced Telegram to email participants to warn them that the project will be delayed which has had further implications as the delay of the issuance will provide some investors the opportunity to back out from the investment. It seems that they had two rounds of capital raises which is then treating investors differently for these delays. Some may have the right to get up to 77% of their investment back if certain clauses of the agreements are triggered.

This is a highly anticipated blockchain project so it is very sad that it has run into this regulatory scrutiny so close to its launch. Given the guidance the SEC had provided months ago, I am surprised that it has come to these extremes of legal actions and injunctions as it seems as both sides knew well of each others positions. I understand in some cases why the SEC puts their duty to protect investors front and center but cannot see it in this case where it is so high profile and backed by a large amount of investors that seem to fall in the accredited class. This may be an important step in the future of ICOs in the space!

Discord: @newageinv#3174

Chat with me on Telegram: @NewAgeInv

Follow me on Twitter: @NAICrypto

The following are Affliate or Referral links to communities that I am a part of and use often. Signing up through them would reward me for my effort in attracting users to them:

If you are like me and interested in continued personal growth, invest in yourself and lets help each other out by leveraging the resources Minnowbooster provides by using my referral link

Start your collection of Steem Monsters today at my referral link

Try the Partiko Mobile app to engage while on the go with my referral link

Get started on the latest game on the blockchain Drug Wars by signing up here!

If you select one of my above referral links, I will sponsor a @steembasicincome SBI in return. Let me know if you do so in the comments below!

DISCLAIMER: The information discussed here is intended to enable the community to know my opinions and discuss them. It is not intended as and does not constitute investment advice or legal or tax advice or an offer to sell any asset to any person or a solicitation of any person of any offer to purchase any asset. The information here should not be construed as any endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company or asset by me. There are inherent risks in relying on, using or retrieving any information found here, and I urge you to make sure you understand these risks before relying on, using or retrieving any information here. You should evaluate the information made available here, and you should seek the advice of professionals, as appropriate, to evaluate any opinion, advice, product, service or other information; I do not guarantee the suitability or potential value of any particular investment or information source. I may invest or otherwise hold an interest in these assets that may be discussed here.


Shared On DLIKE

Sort:  

Telegram should challenge the constitutionality of SEC regulation of crypto. Crypto is just a immutable public ledger AKA a printing press.
The First Amendment protects it from Federal government regulation.

That is an interesting perspective although the precedent is probably on funding and not the printing of anything whether physical or digital. However, I think they are doing their economy a disservice by limiting growth and innovation in the technology and the markets it is creating.

Posted using Partiko iOS

Thank you so much for participating in the Partiko Delegation Plan Round 1! We really appreciate your support! As part of the delegation benefits, we just gave you a 3.00% upvote! Together, let’s change the world!

Hi @newageinv!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 4.650 which ranks you at #1770 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 91 contributions, your post is ranked at #37.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • Some people are already following you, keep going!
  • The readers like your work!
  • Try to work on user engagement: the more people that interact with you via the comments, the higher your UA score!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Sad news indeed.

Already these days, with the problems faced by another private cryptocurrency project (Alliance LIBRA), I had seen news that seems to point to a strong rejection or at least resistance from regulatory bodies of different National States to stop or stop the advance of this blockchain technology.

I do not know if it will be the case that they intentionally oppose this technology and the changes they represent or it will simply be the fear or "resistance to change" that can be pointed out at different times of change in history.

Great stuff @newageinv

Upvoted and resteemed.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 61800.05
ETH 2496.29
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.64