The first link to Tertill is broken, also the last link is a google search, have you tried duck-duck-go?
The idea is completely sound, they can spray the weeds with vinegar and it will kill the weed while decomposing into carbohydrates which are food for plants, which is why I think you put your remark about anti-chemical alarmists at the beginning since the article talks about herbicides, and I'd remove the other sources and keep the last one(routers), as they are redundant and hardly have any meat to chew on.
GREAT IDEA.
you can make a post TOO!
In the blockchain what I did counts as a post, odd how that works, here's another one.
It is his post...
What's your point, seems that you had a thought but are at a loss for words to conclude what you had to say, do you want me to do it for you?
It's his post, and that is my comment.
Your comments sounded like you were an English teacher trying to school him for not writing the post the way you would if you had written it. Now you just seem tight wound and defensive. Hopefully you can be ok letting it go. It's just a post man.
Why, did I say anything about his grammar or spelling? Absolutely not. I only gave him a heads up that the links he had were SPAMMY and making it seem as if there was much more to it than it actually was, and I told him that one of his links is broken. Why did you assume that I "sounded" like that? Also why do I seem not "ok" and why does it seem like "I'm holding onto what I said" as if I was repeating myself and insisting on what I remarked, and why am I defensive, simply because I remarked that your thought was incomplete or because of what I said previously? I won't hold my breath because people who are worried about what things "sound" like are fallaciously focusing on tone policing and don't actually care about the substance of what was said, hence why you started speaking only about "it sounded" and what it seems to you, without any lick of substance for what actually transpired and why you won't be able to reason any of the question I posed which stand rhetorical and will remain so, maybe you can appreciate the nuance of what something is, and not what something appears or seems to you like.