Deep Dives Research | An Introduction
Introducing Deep Dives
What is Deep Dives?
Deep Dives is part of an overarching project that’s been percolating in my mind ever since joining Steemit.
It’s a way to engage the community in quality, focused and supportive research. The desired outcome is to produce a diverse body of well sourced, immutable and original works of research articles preserved on the blockchain.
At the same time, Deep Dives aims to reward original content creators who contribute high-quality articles to the challenge, the community and the platform.
Many of us already see the importance of the blockchain for preserving content and are devising ways in which to leverage the strengths of the blockchain for the benefit of quality independent journalism and research.
Ultimately, it is hoped that together we can produce a sustainable mechanism for fostering open sourced investigations, solid research, and independent journalism.
The vision we have in mind is that eventually research initiatives, such as Deep Dives will be completely determined by the will of the community through discussion, debate and expression of mutual interest.
In time, we hope that the project will move beyond the contest label and through community engagement the body of research we generate will be both substantial and resilient.
The Quality Content Conundrum
Nobody wants to be a controlling tyrant dictating what you should or shouldn’t research, or at least we don’t. Therefore, community interaction will play an essential role in the process.
Even so, in order to be effective quality research requires a point of focus with some sort of parameters. For this reason, I believe that, at least in the early stages, Deep Dives is best suited to a contest format. It also provides an opportunity to gauge community interest in this type of project and to gain direct feedback.
As always, the question will arise – who’s able to judge quality research?
Quality content is for the most part subjective, yet I believe there are certain principles and guidelines that can be followed to surmise what is and what is not considered quality research.
Presence of Quality
- Original content - Work that is your own, unique perspective or angle
Ex: leak/email/doc/court filings that have not been widely reported on - Corroborating evidence - backup what you say
- Well sourced – links/ citations/ quotes/ etc.
- Clear and concise - Explain the significance of your findings
- Analysis - Dot connecting
- Well written - clarity
Absence of Quality
- Plagiarism
- Lack of supporting evidence
- Lack of sources
- Overabundance of links
- Analysis – Scattered, muddled or perplexing
- Poorly written – unclear
Everyone is welcome to participate in Deep Dives, the more the merrier. Still, those wishing to have their contributions chosen as first-rate research should meet certain criteria to have their work recognized and earn additional rewards.
Support for Deep Dives
This project has been in the making for some time. In lengthy conversations with fellow researchers and Steemians @fortified and @ausbitbank we’ve been discussing how to best organize an initiative that harnesses the power of open source investigations and the blockchain.
The Writer’s Block (TWB / @thewritersblock) is also in full support of this project and TWB administrator @rhondak has created a special channel called ‘The Big Dig’ dedicated to bringing this project to life.
“The Big Dig” channel will be a place for sharing ideas, investigative resources, reviewing the work of fellow researchers, and providing a space to discuss research oriented topics.
Along with myself, these individuals will form part of the core group behind Deep Dives in the early stages.
Here’s a link to The Writer's Block discord main channel - https://discord.gg/n88PSw
Tell the Writers' Block hosts in Welcome Center that you're there for The Big Dig channel, and they will give you a role that creates instant access.
Be aware that the Big Dig is fresh as can be and will need a bit of time before it gets rolling ;)
Community Engagement Feedback
Community feedback, participation and engagement are crucial to the success of this initiative. It’s hoped that through community input this project can be refined over time and produce sustainable quality content on a continuous basis.
With Communities / Hivemind / and _SMT_s on the horizon, there’s never been a better time to create the necessary scaffolding for community based research.
Who exactly do I have in mind when I speak of community? Well that’s easy.
- Independent Journalists
- Citizen Journalists
- Open source investigators
- Researchers
- Activists
- Information, news and political junkies
- Crowd Sourced Investigators
- Writers
- Those looking for a challenge
There are already communities forming in these areas. #informationwar, #familyprotection and #donaldmarshall are several examples that quickly come to mind as well as numerous communities blossoming on various discord channels from the Minnow Support Project to @Suzi3d’s discord group – Suzie’s Steemit Club.
A quick note, @suzi3d and @elizbethleavos host a weekly live YouTube research project called Decipher You based on the Snowden Files made available to the public. I highly recommend that you tune in and check it out.
This post would not be complete without mentioning the excellent people and free-thinkers at the MSP Truth-Conspiracy-Politics channel on Discord as well.
@perceptualflaws, @tremendospercy, @an0nkn0wledge, @venomnymous, @lyndsaybowes, @jimbobbill, @johnvibes, …
Deep Dives does not seek to compete with these initiatives but rather to compliment them.
You may already be a member of one of these communities and many of us have common ground.
- Counter Propaganda
- Exposing corruption
- Honest Reporting
- Open Source Intelligence (OSINT)
- Digging Deeper
- Political commentary
- Activism
- “Truth”
- Self-Improvement
By participating in Deep Dives I hope to bring people together to share information, debate hot topics and to discuss current events and research related research.
Importance of Community Feedback
To be clear, Deep Dives is the name of a research based challenge series. It’s not a community per se but a puzzle piece towards connecting communities through active research.
What will this research community look like?
Well a number of items will need to be addressed going forward.
- Creation of Community account / Naming the account
- Regular contest vs #deepdives hashtag
- Directing future research / Prioritizing research focus
- Community leadership framework
- Creating a Discord channel
- Long term research models
- Onboarding Devs / creating research tools
If you have any feedback or questions of any kind, please leave a comment below. I would love to hear your honest opinions and suggestions.
As I’ve been putting this post together, I’ve noticed a few successful examples of the use of #hashtags in fostering community engagement.
I’d like to tip my hat to those working to bring people together around common interests Kudos to @canadian-coconut, @fulltimegeek, @markwhittam, @stevescoins, @truthforce, @wakeupnd
#informationwar
#familyprotection
#donaldmarshall
It is my personal opinion that Deep Dives could work just as well as a hashtag as in contest form. I’d like to test the waters with Deep Dives challenge to see if the community responds positively to the initiative and to take into consideration any feedback you might have.
As the host of several successful contests on the blockchain with the Conspiracy Writing Contest and Tin Foil Raps competitions, I’ve seen firsthand that providing the right prompts and incentives absolutely results in the creation of high-quality original content.
Future Editions of Deep Dives
The first edition of Deep Dives will focus on the Wikileaks archive at Wikileaks.org.
Subsequent editions may focus on particular archives such as the CIA Library, The FBI’s -The Vault, the Paradise Papers or FOIA documents.
Other Deep Dive challenges may be guided by themes instead. For example, the Middle East, US politics, human trafficking, surveillance the deep state, etc.
Archives
The emphasis on using archives as the starting point is that they provide a strong foundation to build on top of. Grounding your research in government cables/emails/documents can add weight and legitimacy to your work. It also makes it more likely that solid research posted to the blockchain will be cited or referenced elsewhere. This has the potential to bring more views and generate more interest in original works produced on the platform.
Personally, I’m very excited to see how this initiative unfolds. I hope you join me on this journey deep below the surface.
If you’d like to get involved please feel free to contact me on discord or steemchat.
Deep Dives 1st Edition to Follow Shortly
Deep Dives | Research Challenge | First Edition (1.0) |The Wikileaks Archive
EDIT / UPDATE - @deepdives account is UP!
Here's the link to Deep Dives Research Challenge - First Edition - The Wikileaks Archives
Image Credit - Image1 - Image2
Awesome work my friend. At first I thought you were gonna talk about when Scarlett Johanson took a deep dive in the movie "Ghost in the Shell", but this idea might even be more interesting haha.
With regards to topic and scope, is there a minimum amount of affected individuals to make the piece relevant? I mean micro versus macro, A small town scandal versus millions of refugees type story? Or is the world our oyster so to speak?
Lol, right because I love Scarlett Johanson...
The topic/scope will be announced officially in a separate post within the next 12-24hrs. This post is more of an introduction to the project we're trying to organize. More details are on the way, but yes, the first edition will be quite broad and really up to the individual contributors. Future installments will be more specific.
The world is your oyster @jasonshick ;)
Another great initiative buddy, I’m sure it’ll help get more truth posts out onto the steemit blockchain. The more folks researching truth posts the better for the future.
Thanks for the mention too mate.
Upvoted and resteemed!
Love the name and the goal. 100000000000%!!!
The future is looking bright for teaching people to question/analyze everything and seek the truth. I have been saying for the last few months that once more people realize they can use Steempower as a tool to pay content creators it is going to change everything.
Appreciate the mentions :)
Thanks @truthforce writing
Thank you!
You're doing great work and we are literally in an 'information war' right now - a battle for our minds.
I'm stoked this resonates with you , as I hoped it would!
We have a real opportunity to build something substantial here, together.
100000000000% appreciate your support, cheers!
Great idea @v4vapid! This is right up my alley! Steemit is such a wonderful platform for exposing corruption and spreading information I think in part because of the anonymity of the authors. I'm currently trying to spread awareness about organized gangstalking, as well as what's happening in my life with CPS under the #familyprotection tag. I mostly write from my own experience, and reading your post I realized that when I do share information or statistics, I don't cite my sources often enough. It's funny you're using Julian Assange too because I just wrote about what's happening to him the other day, and didn't cite my sources. Something I definitely have to work on.
Looking forward to reading the contributions to your deep dives challenge as well! :)
I hope you are further encouraged not only to cite sources, but to download and archive them on the blockchain, where they are relatively secure from the ongoing scrubbing of relevant information from the net.
There are moves afoot to divest even extant archival solutions online of informative and damning material. Sources cited won't matter if those sources have been deleted. We need to preserve the actual material.
Thanks!
Great point @valued-customer, this is something that NEEDS to happen. I 100% agree that we need a blockchain based archival system where documents can be permanently preserved.
Have you heard of the new journalism blockchain on the ETH network? If you haven't it's worth checking out. It's called CIVIL.
https://joincivil.com/
It's an interesting system with approval periods, challenges, rejections and appeals. They will have a 'challenge' option where pieces can be disputed. It also costs crypto in order to challenge. I've only had time to skim over it but it does seem that there will be an 'entity' called the J.A.B. that will rule over challenges. Certainly, worth a look.
I have heard of Civil, and my impression of it is mostly dependent on it's challenge system. I am not particularly skilled at math, but saw that whoever was able to apply the largest sum would surmount the challenge.
I was not convinced that this would best deliver forthright information to folks seeking it.
Perhaps I misunderstood the mechanism. If you have a better grasp of that mechanism, and I am wrong, I'd be grateful to be disabused.
Regardless, journalism =/= information, and a robust archival solution would potentiate citizen journalists to gain and disseminate that information as they felt appropriate, without the present danger of that information being buried, purged, or otherwise made unavailable by those that might not want it to be known.
Thanks!
Like I said, I haven't had time to inspect the system thoroughly and I don't completely understand the mechanism myself either. For instances, who makes up the JAB that is suppose to rule on challenges?
I also see your point about how the biggest wallet could have undue influence across the forum, a valid concern. I'll have to take a closer look though before I make any conclusions.
For exposing corruption, it's would be best if the post is supported by legit photos to make it even more interesting and credible enough to read or people will just ignore it. I'm looking forward to communities who're brave enough to discuss about corruption issues because people should be aware of that.
I think this gonna be great. It's easy to for new Steemian to give up writing quality articles after few written articles because those articles are usually lost in sea of new posts and they get only few upvotes and views. After few of those unnoticed articles most of them give up. That is big problem of this platform.
Well if they are new, they wouldn't know for this initiative too, so I would encourage you to encourage others to post in comments of articles related to this initiative mention about this initiative, so newcomers and other Steemians will have support of this community.
To be honest I want to write quality articles about subjects of this initiative. Have problem with of lack of time, but that is not key issue for me. The issue is I feel my post will be lost in sea of posts and after few posts it's super easy to give up, especially if you gave everything to that posts and got nothing in return.
I hope this initiative will help everyone willing to do some research...
Thanks.
I'm having that exact problem and have been trying to decide what to do on this platform. This gives me the hope to stand my ground and keep making actual quality content.
It seem you found your spot :) Keep it going...
Really well said @cmoljoe! And that's so great to hear @adamkent, I'm glad you've found a niche!
Thanks @lyndsayhaejin
Trying to make me physically ill? lol
hahahaha
This is an awesome idea! I am in, and also interested to see what people will come up with.
Thanks for the mention :-)
Yessss Johnny!
You're exactly the kind of person I want involved with this initiative.
I'd love to see what we are all capable of working together towards common goals!
Cheers brother ;)
I will check it out, thanks!
Hi - this sounds like just sort of thing I'm looking for to support two threads of research I'm interested in developing through steemit: a critical approach to understanding social media (seems like an obvious place to do it) and critical approach to what I call the 'painfully ordinary life of the worker consumer'... I might have to get in touch on discord if the themes ever head in those directions!
Cheers!
Karl.
When I read this I did wonder about a few people who might be keen - analytical researcher types, roll up!
Ps. Your comment is here twice if you fancy tidying up V's comments feed a little!
I prefer to think of myself as a 'pseudo-academic'.
I'll clear up the feed, that was just a function of steemit's dysfunctionality.
P.S. have you sent any money dustbuster's way? It might help me save a little VP if you have.
'pseudo-academic' it is then :)
Yes I'm sure the tools are to blame for the double comment - won't be the last duplicate i'm sure!
I did send @dustbuster a little, and delegated some too as I think it has cracking potential.
This is a totally fantastic idea, it is hard to say more than that, I hope I can contribute and look forward to reading others research and posts, bring on the "TRUTH" Superb.
Great idea!