You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: @curie has supported you - You might want to consider a witness vote!
I get that you want to generate traffic and that that is the reason of putting all the names there.
But I think you could have done that by not making any difference between people that did and did NOT vote for curie as a witness. Like I said... I still don't know enough about steemit to know the impact of my vote for a certain witness (I might have lived under a rock ;)). I agree that ** content rules steemit atm, but why not make that vision part of your campaign!?
The people that have voted already do not need to notified that @curie needs help.
I suggest you do spend a little time researching into what the witnesses do for the blockchain - they are the reason for its continued existence, for one.
@curie are a team dedicated to surfacing exceptional content, you are one of the people who have provided this content in the past. If they are to continue doing this, they need help.
Again, apologies if you think my approach was not the best method, I am only trying to do what I think is best for the future of this platform.