It is not an oppinion if it is law or regulation. I do not think in any event one could ever justify a reason for why they would be against the idea of homosexual relations of any sort. (other than story books)

Assisted suicide is off topic, but a valid point when explaining two consenting people. Just like homosexual intercourse, it does not effect you directly in anyway. So an oppinion is invalid from anyone not being directly impacted. (No pun intended)

I am unsure as to which policy you are referring to. Never was a policy mentioned in your article. You explained a man made an advance and then asked if you were gay when you rightfully stated you were married.

My original response refers to why the said man in the story may not be a homophobe in which your article seemed to narrarate towards. With that said I would like to state that we only have a short context into what occurred and you asked us about how we feel about the gay community. I had no choice but to write a short response to a short article with the hopes of avoiding any assumptions.