You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Why Did @neal.leo Downvote You?
Hi @neal.leo
You've just downvoted this:
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@blockchainstudio/nitrous-beneficiary-info-tag-order-fix
As you may know LEO also uses Nitrous which had the bug that I fix. You should appreciate my work, not downvoting. I appreciate if you cancel your downvote.
Even the official account @steem.leo upvoted this post.
I'm helping steem community so many things including https://economicstudio.github.io/vp/?a=neal.leo&t=LEO
and Nitrous, steem, busy, @scotauto
ps. It seems your main account is @nealmcspadden and I guess we had this miscommunication before too :)
Yes, you do good work. It's just not investing related. So I upvoted your post with my main STEEM account and downvoted for LEO.
people may have different opinion, but this kind of dev work is allowed in other communities and you're not a representative of LEO right? So it's you freedom but I don't like your idea.
You're making dead PoB more dead.
Unless it's officially prohibited from your community, if you don't remove your downvote, you are probably doing something wrong.
Technically it's also related to investment. due to tag order problem people may not want to use nitrous/scot, worth of tokens will be going down.
Have you ever thought about why steem price is like this even though there are many seemingly active scot communities?
If it's not well operated, people don't buy it.
and I FIXED THE IMPORTANT BUG! for communities. you know how much devs of like me can get for the time that I used? It's okay not to appreciate but don't use downvote in the wrong place.
Since sort of last resort of PoB, Utopian (if you know this) will end by the end of this month, you may not even see my posts that often anymore anyway.
ps. I'll remove my downvote if you remove your downvote.
This is a dumb argument. The process of deciding whether a piece of content is on-topic or off-topic is the definition of Proof of Brain.
Welcome to decentralized freedom.
If you had a portion of your post that detailed the investment ramifications of the changes to the code, then yes it would be on-topic. See Step Two:
beneficiary info wan't shown before, which is investment related right or not?
you expected to receive something but received less, then you may feel deceived.
In any sense, my previous post is also related to investment.
I'm a very logical person, unless it's a mistake, I also care which tags should be included.
BENEFICIARY IS INVESTMENT INFO you should admit that.
It's still your freedom to downvote, but care about contents and people. You're losing more of your investment otherwise.
People may not like LEO anymore if there are too many unjustified downvotes.