You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Human vs. Bot Curators - Introducing Human Competition into the Equation - Allow Whales to Delegate Curation Power to Dolphins and Minnows
Ok I am very familiar with this idea. I just really want to know how you want to compare quality of curators. who is better ?
- the curator who is up voting very valuable content
- the curator who up vote just very profitable content even if its shit
I am disgusted by current situation .the categories like : trading, money, investing are full of nonsense post .
I do not want even add this tag below my posts.
The whales are doing worst possible service to steemit by forcing people to write spam. I swear this is like 95% of money goes to spammers who "copy paste " nonsense images of charts taken from the websites without any reasonable content. Those curator(bots) created by whales are evaluating nonsense content.
how you want to deal with this ?
With the model that I am proposing, the whales who have large amount of SP would each be able to set their own criteria for what makes a 'good' curator.
This should help with (although not necessarily completely solve) the issue you bring up, because it would shift the curation process away from automation (bots and lists) and more to human curators who can spend the time finding quality content. Most of the curation projects that have humans behind them (@smooth, the Curie project, @robinhoodwhale) have had pretty good success with identifying and upvoting quality content.
yes i think the bot curation is very open to failures in the keyword search lists which create a vote action but without the true ability to read and analyze the content in terms of presentation and quality value. Real curation ie an intelligent person that reads articles, i am sure is more efficient and possibly more profitable for whales in the long run. As indeed Steemit,s success as i see it relies very much on the provision and rewarding of quality posts!! upvoted. What is good for Steem is good for us all no doubt !
Yes, agreed 😀