How to properly evaluate a cryptocurrency before pouring all your life savings into it

Bitcoin (1).jpg
(Image Courtesy of Google)
Back in 2009 when Bitcoin first started, choosing a cryptocurrency to invest in was not that hard because well, it was the only one around at that time. Fast forward to 2017 and there are over a thousand different cryptocurrencies to choose from (see www.coinmarketcap.com). Some of these coins are backed up by amazing technology, with real world practical value that could potentially revolutionize how we do things today but some of them...well all I can say is you will be better off buying your grandma's wooden spoon than investing your money in them. But then how do you tell which coin is great to put your money into and which is not? With so many of these coins to choose from, it's quite easy, and frankly, also quite understandable to get a bit confused . Here is a practical checklist that you can use to try and filter the wheat from the chaff.

Technology
You first have to look at the technology and the problem that it is trying to solve. Does it have any real world practical application? If the answer to that is yes then that is most probably a good coin to invest in.

Team behind the project

A great team behind a project increases the probability of the project being a success. Browse through the project's website and look for the team. Try to read about their background. If possible also verify the information on linkedin and other social media. An endorsement from reputable, well known people (Ethereum's Vitalike Buterin, for example) is also a great way to tell if the team is a capable one or not.

Total supply of coins
This is kind of subjective but I personally prefer coins with a reasonably low supply. As a rule of thumb I prefer coins with a total supply of under 100 million coins. In my experience, coins with a large total supply (over a billion in circulation, for example) seldom have drastic increases in price. After all, low supply and high demand means an increase in price right?

Regular Communication from the team

If the coin is still under development, a team that is constantly engaging with it's supporters shows commitment from the team and hence, a determination to make the project a success. For me personally, if a team is not constantly giving out updates about it's project, I usually stay clear.

White Paper

Last but not least is the white paper. If you've got time, take time to read a project's white paper before investing any money in it. This is where you will find all the information about a coin with regards to but not limited to the vision of the project, the development team's road map, etc. A hastily written whitepaper with a lot of grammatical and spelling mistakes is usually not a very good sign.

Whilst the aforementioned information should not be taken as investment advice, it will be quite useful when you are searching for a really good coin to invest in. Just bear in mind that the cryptocurrency world is very unpredictable and there isn't any sure way of knowing how a coin will behave in the future. I hope these indicators will help you get less bumps and bruises. If you have any other suggestions , please feel free to share them with other Steemians in the comments section below

Sort:  

Good points. I always look at the sentimental value.
When I'm choosing my coins, I don't even check how much they're worth. I do the research on team and their solutions.
Great example of good coin like this is Gridcoin - it was built on top of very famous researching software, became a token of appreciation from scientific organizations to volounteers. Is backed up by 7 years of developement and big partners (such as Seti and other prominent researchers).

However there are traps. Another 'cloud-super-computer' coin, comming out soon is called Golem. Generally it seams like a great idea, block-chain based super-computer possible to be rented and used by anyone with credit.
However is there a market for such solutions? To make it short: No.

Really large computing power is already covered for science by Gridcoin. For private pruposes the code can't be distributed by block-chain, mainly due to the confidentiality of operations. It's also cheaper and more secure to keep a dedicated machine in an enterprise business. So golem, even thought it looks all flashy and shinny - by me is not such a great technology.

You are quite right. For me personally real world practical application and mass adoption is what matters the most. In the end, even if you have got great, flashy technology, it will all be a waste if noone is using it.

Thank for the valious information

Thanks @covals, I am glad you find the information useful

Following you!

Congratulations @westconnect! You have received a personal award!

1 Year on Steemit
Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.

Do you like SteemitBoard's project? Then Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Congratulations @westconnect! You received a personal award!

Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.23
TRX 0.20
JST 0.035
BTC 97105.70
ETH 3328.65
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.16