Tech News - Blockchain, BCH, BTC and Cryptocurrency Explained!
Image Source: Pexels
Blockchain can be difficult to understand. Some people think that Bitcoin is a blockchain but in reality it is a cryptocurrency with its own blockchain.
A cryptocurrency could operate with its own blockchain but it doesn't mean a blockchain is a cryptocurrency.
I thought it was time to finally get things right. What am I talking about eh? Well, a lot of people have asked me in the past what was the difference between a blockchain and a cryptocurrency. The answer often confused them and they felt they didn't want to know anymore after I tried to explain! However, in this article I would like to give a bit of clarification on the difference between a cryptocurrency and a blockchain and also offer a bit of insight on the difference between between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.
So without further delay let me get going with this! Bitcoin (BTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) are extremely similar considering BCH is fork (replica) of BTC with several key adjustments. The one thing they have in common is the fact that there will never be more than 21 million of either of them. This makes both of them suitable places to park money considering the laws of supply and demand. Digital assets are unlike physical assets in the sense that you cant touch digital assets, however, they are not that much different than stocks or bonds in the sense that you can convert them into fiat cash relatively easily.
The major divergence between Bitcoin (BTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) comes down to ranking of priorities.
In its current construct, design, and roadmap, the BTC community is focused first on keeping Bitcoin decentralized so that it can remain as a public, permissionless, highly censor-resistant network that anyone in the world can use and build on top of. Fast, cheap payments are a secondary priority.
This chart visually demonstrates the point made above:
Both are competing to be the one and only 'Bitcoin' but more likely than not they will both continue to exist perpetually. Their future valuations are uncertain however...
The author of the article I'm referencing makes the following point here:
In my view, Bitcoin’s features as a public (anybody can use it), permissionless (anybody can build on top of it), highly censor-resistant (nobody can block your transactions), and un-seizable form of money all stem from its decentralized architecture. If Bitcoin loses its decentralization, then it’s just an inferior form of centralized institutions.
In my opinion BTC has already accepted a trojan horse in the form of it's recent 'Segwit' upgrade. This is something I doubt has been researched in as much detail as it should have been.
When researching the cons of Segwit I came across this comment on reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/77k5d6/why_is_segwit_bad_honest_question/
Segregated Witness is the most radical and irresponsible protocol upgrade Bitcoin has faced in its eight year history. The push for the SW soft fork puts Bitcoin miners in a difficult and unfair position to the extent that they are pressured into enforcing a complicated and contentious change to the Bitcoin protocol, without community consensus or an honest discussion weighing the benefits against the costs. The scale of the code changes are far from trivial — nearly every part of the codebase is affected by SW.
While increasing the transaction capacity of Bitcoin has already been significantly delayed, SW represents an unprofessional and ineffective solution to both transaction malleability and scaling. As a soft fork, SW introduces more technical debt to the protocol and fundamentally fails to achieve its design purpose. As a hard fork, combined with real on-chain scaling, SW can effectively mitigate transaction malleability and quadratic signature hashing. Each of these issues are too important for the future of Bitcoin to gamble on SW as a soft fork and the permanent baggage that comes with it.
To be honest even though I am @techblogger some of the technical language when discussing blockchain still throws me in loops. The part about Segwit being pushed upon the community without consensus (agreement) is very concerning. According to this statement Segwit has done very little to deal with scalability and reduction of transaction costs which may someday become Bitcoin's undoing.
Now let me get down to the other point I said I would discuss in this article and that was an answer to the question, what is the difference between a blockchain and a cryptocurrency?
Well, you see, when people talk about blockchain they are not necessarily talking about Bitcoin or a cryptocurrency. They may not be referring to other cryptocurrencies that operate on blockchains.
They are most likely referring to the underlying technology that allows for decentralized transferrence of information across time and space.
A blockchain is a series of blocks (code) that act as a ledger or record of events and values. It is verified by nodes, servers, computers through a method of consensus where each entity must agree on validity. If a block appears valid by the masses it is accepted and added to the long chain of blocks that came before it. Think legos but with code. One of the reasons blockchains are so interesting is that they are decentralized. It is sort of a community verified network. Because of this decentralization they are often referred to as 'trustless' because each entity can see what its fellow member wrote and decide for itself if it is valid or not. There are many advantages to running a decentralized service as opposed to a centralized one but one of the biggest advantages is free and open access to information with limited risk of corruption.
Blockchain will most likely be incorporated into everyday life on a much larger basis going forward. The age of AI, decentralized data storage and transparent ledger access may be starting. It is almost certainty that the future is going to be an interesting place and we should be prepared for unimaginable changes going forward with the paradigm shift blockchain is sure to encourage!
Let me know what you think about bitcoin, bitcoin cash and blockchain technology.
Thanks for reading.
Authored by: @techblogger
In-text citations sources:
Bitcoin vs. Bitcoin Cash: A Story Of Prioritization & Healthy Competition In Money - Forbes
How Bitcoin Cash Has Suddenly Become the Real Thing - The CoinTelegraph
Reddit - https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/77k5d6/why_is_segwit_bad_honest_question/
Hello! Your post has been resteemed and upvoted by @ilovecoding because we love coding! Keep up good work! Consider upvoting this comment to support the @ilovecoding and increase your future rewards! ^_^ Steem On!
Reply !stop to disable the comment. Thanks!
To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.
Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.