I recognize that long term, very long term that the inflationary model/algorithm will need to change, when account creations plateau. And that ad dollars could be used to offset this change. But I think it is too risky for it to implemented the way you suggest - that using steempower to incentivize and upvote content that the company does not create themselves. When I see big companies doing web contests the trolls always ruin it and it backfires. And if someone made a horribly funny inappropriate content, this audience would probably up vote it the most. Having said that, advertising on steemit is something I have been thinking about in trying to understand the long term viability of this inflationary crypto model. Ultimately, the real question is what is the reason for people to continue to buy steem? I think the advertising reason is far away from happening. One thing you did not mention in the video, is what critical mass will look like. What happens when the first big celebrity joins steemit? The adoption rate, meaning account creation, will explode. I remember when Ashton Kutcher joined twitter and changed everything. So the inflation model being used to support viral growth will be sustainable for quite a while. Which means buying steem as a speculative investment will continue to be sustainable as long as growth outpaces inflation. I would like to see steempower become a popularity contest like numbers of friends on facebook or high score in a game. It should be published beside every profile name. If steempower is seen as a status symbol then that demand in the market will support the system further. But thanks for the video, I always like hearing people talk about crypto at a deeper level.