Bill S.1241: Amending the Definition of a Financial Institution
Just saw this shared in my social feed and wanted to bring it to your attention also:
via news.bitcoin.com
Here's a quote of interest:
Instead of utilizing the definition of a ‘financial institution’ which includes business models like banks and credit unions, S.1241’s amendment in Section 5312(a) of title 31, United States Code states that the definition now includes, “an issuer, redeemer, or cashier of prepaid access devices, digital currency, or any digital exchanger or tumbler of digital currency.”
It also goes on to talk about the $1 TRILLION added to the U.S. budget with the tax bill passed last night.
Let me get this straight.
The government can put a trillion dollars of liabilities on people without their consent (including some who haven't even been born yet), but if we want to control our own store of value, that's somehow a crime???
This is becoming so ridiculous.
Will this be extended to suggest owning a private cryptocurrency could be illegal also? What a mess.
Declining payout since I'm just sharing a link.
Reading their definition of a prepaid access device & the modified definition of a financial institution, it seems like the language is so overly broad as to make almost every retailer in the country a “financial institution” given the widespread issuance of gift cards and sale of instruments such as prepaid visas & phone cards. It’s bizarre.
I was thinking the same thing. Are gift cards going to be criminalized next? So freaking stupid.
Someone is going to have to pay off the $10 trillion that Obama spent and the $10 trillion that every other president spent before Obama.
Trust the government to go after the "good guys" to chase nickels and dimes. Lot easier to get money from the sheeple, then it is to do the hard work of going after criminals.
Such broad legislation lays the foundations for yet more selective enforcement, which tyrannical governments everywhere seem to love.
Very unsettling. I think this is a reaction to the next wave of crypto cards (prepaid access devices) that are coming to the market (e.g. Ocash and the likes). Until now, crypto was hard to use, but soon, point of sales and online merchants will process crypto tokens without knowing it! So it's only logical for centralized powers to make it illegal in advance, while nobody is aware of the coming crypto tsunami. Add to that "digital currency issuers" and "any digital exchanger of digital currency" and you cover the whole crypto spectrum. However, it is also very clumsy in that in one year, almost everybody will be considered as an offender. This is not realist and can not be enforced in the long run. Maybe this is an attempt to delay crypto short term.
Its not an attempt to delay, its just a way to keep up control and keep people enslaved to their tax system that they created, its illegal in the first place.
Thanks for posting this Luke, really makes me think, how hard it is becoming just to get by in life when everything you do is taxed.
They should go after all the banks and clean them up first before changing anything to do with what is or is not a financial institution.
That is exactly right!
the banks are their employers
Yeah true, hang the bankers and watch the prosperity of earth grow.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-20/icelandic-anger-brings-record-debt-relief-in-best-crisis-recovery-story.html
I made a post about this same thing, Its ridiculous that we have to be worried about having a crypto wallet of any kind when ACTUAL criminals in wall street and government have American bank accounts full of dirty money. Also we would have to declare how much in crypto we have while moving through borders if we have more than $10,000 worth of coins... But actual crooks could breeze right through with a bank of america account...come on
When was this amendment proposed - I don't see an active proposal on any FED sites I have access to..
Very concerning though if it's legit
It's linked to in the article. Goes here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/1241/text#toc-idea0e9489fc8f46379f95bb56c8bbbda5. Is that what you mean?
We have to pay for the $10 trillion Obama spent with his friends over 8 years.
Harder to get that much back from the criminals, then it is to slowly siphon it off the sheeple. Government is going to love full digital currency with no cash, it will be so easy to dip their hands into sheeple wallets.
Very true, thats the main reason I haven't gone fully into bitcoin, governments do what they want and sheeple wallets are a prime target, with vault 7 it shows they have hooks into every device. So how hard would it be for them to just take digital assets and say it was "a hacker from russia". Or just take tax out whenever they feel like it.
Again, I'm going to ask why the government doesn't take the NSA and turn it into a crytocurrency generator? They'd make more money and they wouldn't need to tax. (sigh)
Because taxes aren't about money, they are about control.
Joseph, Do you really think the government, and any of those 3 letter agencies have interest in the common man or doing the right thing? Other than to use you as a slave or asset they can make money from.
Check out Anna Von Reitz, she has uncovered a lot and if people wake up and see through corporate lies we may get somewhere.
I know exactly what the government wants. Perpetual slaves that create taxes that they collect. if there was a way to charge us for absorbing sunlight and breathing air, they'd do it.
Yep thats exactly right and thats what they have Perpetual Slaves.
When you think about it we need to breath air so we can go to slavery camps,(work whatever you want to call it) so we can pay their taxes.
Not being smart or anything I get what your saying, good point, I hope that doesn't come across the wrong way?