I'm trying to understand the key diffs between how consensus is determined between DPoS and this virtual voting across all node timelines and the witness nodes therein. Since both have the theoretical constraint on not having anymore than a third of the consensus network being bad players, than, with regards to the consensus problem , both models probably only are marginally different in performance, convergence, especially now that EOS is asynchronous and deterministic. I havent studied the gossip protocol to know what benefits we can infer beyond those of EOS multi-threaded messaging, but hashgraph criticisms that i find interesting are those that point out its weakness on a non-permissionend consensus network is no different than other voting models, indeed, if those other models ran private its consensus wouldno doubt perform better too. I bet on a horse that has run in bigger and higher stakes races than one that is private and controlled. We will see how the crypto community takes to it