Summary of Virtual Currency Senate Hearing

in #cryptocurrency7 years ago

rts1dw9n-e1517857455736 copy.jpg

Virtual_Currencies__The_Oversight_Role_of_the_U_S__Securities_and_Exchange_Commission_and_the_U_S__Commodity_Futures_Trading_Commission_-_Hearings_-_U_S__Senate_Committee_on_Banking__Housing__and_Urban_Affairs.jpg

Today, the US Senate held a discussion entitled “Virtual Currencies: The Oversight Role of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission”.

Here is a summary from my friend Brian VanderMay that refuses to get on Steemit ;)



1. The two commissions need to collaborate to identify the gaps of authority that exist and need to come back to recommend legislation to fill the gaps

2. SEC Chief Clayton was unambiguous in his belief that all ICOs are security offerings

3. CFTC Chief Giancarlo was very positive about the need to facilitate crypto safely and to encourage its growth. He also promised more crackdowns are coming on scammers.

4. Neither group has sufficient staff at this time. SEC mentioned they’re in a hiring freeze and it’s a big problem.

5. CFTC has done more consumer outreach to educate on crypto than anything they’ve ever done.

6. SEC chief said individual’s promotion of ICOs will subject you to securities law, so be cautioned in the manner in which you give advice. Particularly celebrity promotion was called out. In fact, Floyd Mayweather was named.

Decidedly pro crypto overall, but what ICOs will look like in the future is unclear. No taxation discussion of any kind. Basically, a debate over how much disclosure there should be. Relevant and a good start, but no conclusion.

If I missed something important, please feel free to add in the comments and post sources if possible.

coppertone-small.jpg

Sort:  

Reddit is praising them right now . They even talked about HODL Lol .

Did they say HO-DIL? Or did they say "HOLD" ?

" HODL " as per redditors .

I was curious to see how this would turn out, but was out all morning and just got back to the house. Thanks to you my initial research is done. It sounds like not much has changed in the opinions/outlooks of either the SEC or CFTC. This is all what they've already said, and now they've gone and said it to the Senate Banking Committee. It is decidedly pro-crypto, and that's a good thing.

I'm surprised they didn't touch on the issue of exchanges and how to regulate them, especially as I've read that some exchanges are actually registered as "payment services" and as such aren't directly under the oversight of either the SEC or the CFTC.

There's still much to do, but this is great news.

Ayyyyee go crypto!!! Go USA!!!
.....jeez. Haven't said that in a while.
thaaaaanks Trump
(throws up)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.24
JST 0.038
BTC 97120.80
ETH 3374.08
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.13