You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Is Monero’s (or All) Anonymity Broken?
New research vindicates my analysis of the vulnerabilities of Monero
Research has proven my blog to be correct. Page 11 even mentions “chain reactions on the CryptoNote protocol [8]”, where [8] is the MRL-0001 (Monero Research Labs first report), which was created because of what I explained to @smooth in 2014. See above in my blog the relevant sections Combinatorial Blockchain Analysis Deanonymization and Overlapping Mix Sets . I also previously wrote some additional comments on this blog about that.
Note the research is not even using the ability of miners to pay themselves the transaction fees as posited in my blog above, which would amplify the results in the research.
Monero’s Secret ASICs
So the following combined with the post I’m replying to, the recent vindication about my prior warnings to Monero not being able to attain ASIC resistance, I’m now entirely 100% vindicated.
I read today:
So this probably means 100% of Monero’s anonymity mix sets were probably entirely compromised.
I have always said Monero is a honeypot. Lots of people are going to prison because they thought they were anonymous.
P.S. Privacy and anonymity are very difficult in this modern, highly statist era:
https://medium.com/s/story/a-modest-privacy-protection-proposal-5b47631d7f4c