Interesting thoughts.... I agree on the second part, although the word agnostic sounds very harsh to me, to say to a person that you have never met. We can all use words.... When somebody has a different point of view on a theoretical matter, like the one we talk about, the "voice", there are many different schools of thoughts, as to what this voice really is. I don't remember reading any actual proof on the origins of the "voice", although there are many articles and books on the particular matter and you can hear many different opinions about it, based on the background of each person. Obviously an atheist and a believer of faith and God, will have a complete different take on the subject and will explain in a complete different way this "voice" phenomenon. As a world traveler and after a 10 years stay in the US, I have many friends all over the world, with different background, culture and religion. It would be rude to call my friend in Barbados, USA, Isreal, Asia, Europe "agnostic" just because they have a different stance on the matter. Agnostic is the ones that does not listen and is not open to hear new things! You, me and the rest of the world are basing our opinions on what we have read and experienced on the subject. The conclusion is the same, trust this "inner voice", but don't call someone agnostic just because you read a book or two on the matter. Those books are somebody's opinions, and there are many different views on this subject. All the knowledge of this word, that was written in books from great philosophers, artists, scientists and more, was either burned in the fire of the worlds biggest library in Alexandria or is hidden in the basement of the Vatican, for you and me not to see. We are all agnostic from this point of view, because the pure knowledge is either destroyed or kept secret, from you, me and the rest of the planet. cheers from Greece.