In the last season it happened with me that I participated in contest and got good grades and I did comments on almost all the entries but the winners were others who did not make comments on others entries but a few.

It has happened with me again as well in current season one teaching team gave me 9.8 marks but the winners were of lower marks. I was not in the winning list. Maybe he used to follow any other criteria. My entry also included step by step video tutorial as well to complete task and I was happy that I got 9.8 marks. But when I saw the results I was disappointed that winners were others who have marks less than mine.

Actually the question which arises in my mind is that if a professor checks the quality of the post and then allocates marks accordingly. So when selecting the winners where this quality marks go. Was it just a lollipop to make the participant happy? Because the grades are given on the basis of the quality of work. But when in the winners list the top gainer is not available, it looks confusing. In my opinion it is not a good thing.

Here I am not just talking about myself but for others as well who also faced such things. I was also silent but seeing related comment I thought to share my experience as well. And this is my fair opinion and I have e respect for everyone.