China-Pakistan Economic Corridor

Introduction:
Maintainable economic growth, development and positive enlargement of trades in China during the last forty years has allocated the country a out of the ordinary rank in the global economy. The inflation of 2007 - 2008 not only build up the Chinese economy but also improved its position in universal supremacy. However, China initiated to redefining its role in the 1990s, war on terrorism gave it an sufficient time to think and work out on its strategies in accordance with the new world circumstances. Throughout this era when the world was involved in war on terror and was hit by suffered inflation, China increased its trade/exports and worldwide identification, revisited its old associations with other countries, and engaged in new associations and partnerships.

President Xi Jinping for the first time proposed the productive affiliations across the world and raised the slogan of constructive engagements globally. In the reaction the South Asia, which is the neighbor of China, has a special implication in establishing the agenda of constructive engagements, which is now an obvious from the lively involvement of Chinese management in South Asia. President of China Mr. Xi also visited South Asian countries, and made announcements that enormous investment and trade enhancement programmes for South Asian Countries. Furthermore, China also took part in Afghanistan in order to bring peace and for enhancing the growth of Afghanistan. According to the defined strategic order of this Country, the country enhances its foreign relations with Pakistan in a positive manner.

China has started efforts and making relationships more closely with Pakistan in form of new investments and partnerships. The process began in the era of 1990s; but, a joint announcement in this regard was the tangible result after a meeting between President Hu Jintao and President Gen. Pervez Musharraf in 2003 at Beijing (Fmprc, 2003). In meeting of two heads of states focused of the regions of collaboration for the future. Joint proclamations in 2006 further build up the collaboration when Free Trade Agreement (FTA) was signed during the visit of Chinese President in Islamabad.

It slowly but surely prolonged the trade capacity between two countries that is Pakistan and China from $1 billion in 1998 to $15.15 billion in 2015 (VANDEWALLE, 2015). This improved mutual aid then laid the foundation of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

These days, CPEC is a sizzling issue and the most debated topic in Pakistan, South Asia, and Asia and in other countries as well. In Pakistan, there is puzzlement about geopolitical issues, as provinces have exposed their concern over it. South Asian countries have different views on the subject while some look at it as an opportunity for development and prosperity. Others look at it as an alliance against their interests. Asian countries and global community have mixed opinion. Keeping in view all the perceptions, this report throw light on the bewilderment and presents the essentials. Basically CPEC is a set of infrastructure projects at this time projects are under construction in Pakistan the total cost on CPEC is $46 billion, CPEC will build up the economy of Pakistan because of the different projects include energy, highways, and other transportations. China has a share in the whole investments in Gawadar and throughout the Pakistan meanwhile China can trade from one belt , one road from Gawadar Port, China faces difficulties in exporting goods from Malacca so the Malacca dilemma will also be resolved. Furthermore CPEC will also positively affect on Iran, Afghanistan, India, Central Asian Republic. The development of land connectivity will be enhanced roads, rails and air transportation. China Pakistan Economic Corridor is that flight which will lead to the economic regionalization in the globalized world.

Foreign Relations of Pakistan and China (Background)
Pakistan and China both neighbor countries are in friendly relationship since 1950. The first ten years the relations of China with Pakistan was not much good but it was became very smooth relationships after 1960 Inida-China was, and Pakistan India war. Firstly, Pakistan was unwilling to admit China due to differences between cultures, communalist and capitalism blocs, as both countries was not much aware about each other, which delayed their mutual collaboration. Luckily, at that time the then minister for foreign affairs, Sir Zafarullah Khan, had some awareness about Chinese state of mind, which lined the way for Pakistan-China relations (Chaudhri, 1987).

Affairs between the countries afterward strengthened because of the devaluation of Indian currency in 1949, which affected the economy of Pakistan poorly. Pakistan was importing coal for its promising industry, but the devaluation stop the progress of the trade so Pakistan was have no choice except to engage with China in a barter trade of coal for a cotton. Pakistan also sustained the lasting seat of China at United Nations Security Council (Arif, 1984).

Relations between China and Pakistan further improved after the enter in a trade contract enhanced in 1953 (Dixit, 1987). Signing the agreement SEATO in 1954 and another agreement CENTO in 1954 twisted some doubts among Chinese people, as Chinese People visualized it as a threat to the national security. However, Pakistan made clear and gave justification to the China that it was just a signed in order to defend the threats of India (Syed, 1974). Pakistan also developed the Bandung Conference to give justifications and to clarify the suspicions of Chinese endorsed Pakistan’s seven pillars of peace at the conference (Chaudhri, 1970).

In 1959 the relations were affected negatively due to the statement of President Ayub khan about Tibet which produced troubles for Pakistan with regard to relations with China (Jain, 1981). Fortunately, the smashed up was look-after by the then Foreign minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and foreign secretary S. K. Dehlavi. Entering in a agreement on border demarcation by Mr. Bhutto in 1963 gave a motion to Pak-China better relations. In addition, China also aided Pakistan at the time of war in 1965, which made Pakistan come closer with China. on the other hand, China’s unbiased stand during 1971 was conceived by many Pakistani leaders as a sign of no interest (Javaid and Jahangir, 2015).

After the era of 1970s , the relations between both countries became stronger in every sector. China has kindly supported Pakistan in defense sector such as missile and nuclear program, and economic sector, even during the authorization imposed by the US. This directed to trust building between Chinese people and Pakistani People and policy makers. The outcome of this long-term relations between China and Pakistan is the big achievement in the form of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

Appearance of China as International Leader:
China has been doing efforts since many years to re-establish its lost glory. In the time of Mao, China has formulated a policy of cosmopolitanism and made it the most important support of its all policies. First, China engaged in works with collection of Non-Allying countries and step by step enhanced its role. Bandung Conference as launching protection and make stronger relations with many budding countries. China also remained unbiased in global interactions and paid attention progressively on the economic expansion and making strong economic relations throughout the world.

The first action on the said direction was its economic support for South East Asian Countries at the time of the inflation in 1990. It was also the commencement of transformation of relationships with South East Asian Countries (Vaughn and Morrison, 2006). In the tenure of President Hu Jintao, China highlighted its affairs with Middle East, Central Asia and Africa. Meanwhile, President Xi provided a new guidance on the foreign policy and began “Constructive Engagement” policy.

Economic engagement was specified the major focal point in order to moving on the program of constructive engagement. Mr. Xi is aggressively practicing on this scheme through the Silk Route, which encompasses roads, rail arrangements of connectivity and maritime routes. It is also known as “One Belt One Road”. China is endorsing Silk Route as a trade and financial project. On the other hand, many specialists consider that it is not only a trade or economic project but also a preparation for the extension of the role of China Internationally. China is constructing its leading role in Asia and further than economic and political collaboration in the course of “One Belt One Road” (Wang. 2015).

Asian Infrastructure and Development Bank, along with naval bases in many countries are being the examples, as the formation of Asian Infrastructure and Development Bank are being taken as competitive to existing financial system and domination of USA in the worldwide financial sector (Xu, 2015). String of Pearls, a term which is being exercise to portray a chain of Sea Ports, i.e. Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Burma and Pakistan has been believed as tactical investment to curtail India (Kabraji, 2012). Another example we have is the Construction of Djibouti base. Moreover, in recent times China also marked the huge region in South China Sea as its area and claimed it as part of China. Meanwhile USA has strongly countered this move along with South East Asian associates.

China is still on its journey towards success in the said progress, and international media, academicians, and many other western countries as well as India believe that CPEC is a tactical passage, which benefit and build up the trade and development needs of Pakistan by which the economy of Pakistan will also be grow. Moreover, It has become one of the extremely discussing issues within the country and globally. Debate has produced some arguments among different stakeholders in Pakistan, which is negatively impacting the CPEC progress.

Malacca Dilemma
The life-blood of China’s economy is energy. while not access to energy resources, China’s economy can slow, and its prosperity can wane, {it can|it'll} become additional liable to internal social and political disorder and therefore the CCP’s grip on power will weaken.[1] thus, making certain China’s energy security affects its foreign and defense policy, and can influence the long run development of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).[2] China’s foreign oil demand continues to outstrip decreasing domestic and offshore production and current projections counsel that by 2020 foreign oil can form up sixty six of its total oil demand, increasing to seventy two by 2040.

At the center of the challenge of making certain energy security is ‘the Malacca Dilemma’. Chinese President Hu Jintao recognised the strategic significance of the Malacca perplexity in November 2003 noting that “certain powers have right along encroached on and tried to regulate navigation through the [Malacca] Strait.” [3] the importance of the Malacca Strait is that eightieth of China’s energy (in addition to a lot of of its trade) moves through a waterway that at its narrowest purpose is just one.7 miles across. The close Lombok-Makassar Straits (see map) are strategically vital as most supertankers large for the Malacca Strait traverse this route.[4] China is trying to alleviate its dependency on these waterways by building pipelines through Myanmar and via Gwadar in Pakistan, however none of those comes would replace dependence on the ocean for China’s energy provides.[5]

Therefore in considering solutions to resolution the Malacca perplexity, an understandable step, and one presently being undertaken, is larger cooperative military service diplomacy with alternative international actors to keep up sensible order bewildered, and counter unconventional non-state threats to maritime security like piracy and maritime coercion. national capital additionally might support capability building for littoral states, intelligence exchanges and multi-national coaching through regional security design like the association Regional Forum (ARF). however such period of time practices do nothing to eliminate the Malacca perplexity as long as associate exceedingly|in a very} future conflict China still faces the prospect that an opponent might interdict Chinese shipping passing through the Malacca and Lombok-Makassar Straits.

In a recent discussion over the effectiveness of the U.S.A. ‘AirSea Battle’ conception, Thomas Hammes urged a technique of Offshore management that proposes a foreign blockade on China and notes that the us “…could forestall the passage of enormous lading ships and tankers. In doing therefore, it might cripple China’s export trade, that is crucial to China’s economy.” [6] The strategy highlights the importance of the Malacca, Lombok, and Sunda straits, and making certain routes north and south of Australia were controlled specified “these shipments may be cut off”.[7]

The context of this discussion over U.S.A. strategy is vital to contemplate. China’s speedy rise and its military modernization has generated a regional security perplexity with its neighbours UN agency see China’s assertive behaviour in managing Asian maritime disputes, and worry that below Xi Jinping, China has chosen to maneuver on the far side Deng’s ‘bide it slow, hide your strength’ dictum of policy to embrace a additional assertive commie posture that challenges the prevailing regional order and therefore the strategic importance of the us. Regional states have responded by seeking nearer security ties with the us at identical time because the us has chosen to rebalance to Asia in response to China’s rise. Thus, a regional ‘pull’ combined with a US’ ‘push’ is rising. From Beijing’s perspective, the U.S.A. rebalance, and intra-regional ‘band wagoning’ is indicative of the containment of China, and it's chosen to bar militarily with A2AD. The U.S.A. and its allies see such a Chinese step as reinforcing their perception of a want by China to challenge U.S.A. strategic importance in Asia. The regional security perplexity is sharpened.

For China, Hammes’ Offshore management represents the Malacca perplexity created manifest. In brooding about however China might respond, construction argues that one path to countering the Malacca perplexity is “building credible service capable of securing China’s SLOCs.”[8] however what will this very imply for future PLA modernisation? China can have to be compelled to build credible military military service capabilities also as long-range airpower for maritime strike operations in additional distant operations in ‘Far Seas’ and ‘Far Oceans’ to make sure a capability to interrupt any distant blockade (see map). China’s introduction of the coaching attack aircraft carrier Liaoning in September 2012, is to be followed by up to four additional autochthonic craft carriers doubtless by the mid-2020s, and represents a step within the direction of blue water capabilities designed for such a job.[9] however craft carriers can have to be compelled to be totally supported by military service surface combatants also as acceptable auxiliary vessels designed for at-sea combat maintenance tasks. it's setting out to develop skills in in operation military service task forces in additional distant operations, like those acting on counter-piracy tasks off the Gulf of city, however its provision capabilities square measure skimpy to sustain a foreign task force, particularly one engaged in hypothetically high intensity combat operations. Erickson argues, supported analysis by Nan Li, that by 2020 China can solely be ready to project a modest joint task force for low-intensity operations off from China.[10]

Yet, maintaining China’s energy security in time period can't be seen as being of secondary importance, and China is currently enterprise a series of political and strategic steps, and building new military capabilities that counsel it'ssetting out to answer the threat of distant blockades. At the political and strategic level, President Xi Jinping has recently declared the ‘Maritime Silk Road’ to integrate markets from China to Europe via the ocean littoral region. The Maritime trade route can modify China to develop maritime infrastructure together with ports across the region. The Maritime trade route strengthens China’s economic and political influence, and therefore widens China’s strategic interests across the ocean. this can not represent a replacement development in and of itself, as Holmes and Yoshihara note that China has been active in promoting its influence across the Indian Ocean littoral over recent years.[11] But the stakes are now rising. China’s growing investment and its international prestige associated with the Maritime Silk Road must be protected which will in turn demand presence. That must influence PLA modernisation in coming years, and the Maritime Silk Road now provides a key rationale for an expansion of the PLA’s expeditionary warfare capabilities.

At the military level, Erickson suggests a number of potential indicators for emerging blue water and long-range air capabilities, and three specific capabilities are worthy of consideration.[12] Erickson nominates quieter submarines as being important, and O’Rourke notes that the PLAN’s relatively noisy Shang class nuclear submarines (SSNs) are to be replaced with the quieter and more sophisticated Type 095 guided-missile nuclear submarines (SSGNs).[13] Significantly, China has begun operating its existing submarines in the Indian Ocean, much to the concern of India. Erickson also notes that more advanced surface vessels would be a key indicator. The PLAN is deploying the sophisticated Type 052D Luyang III guided missile destroyer (DDG), but is developing an even more capable Type 055 Cruiser, designed to protect aircraft carriers as part of a battle group and with the first potentially commissioned by 2017.

Finally Erickson notes the importance of long-range air power. China is developing a new stealthy long-range bomber known as the H-20 which is designed to “allow the Chinese air force to complement aircraft carrier and amphibious projection capabilities of the [PLAN]” in conjunction with long-range J-20 stealth fighters. additional vital is the role of PLASAF’s Anti-Ship flight Missile (ASBM) capability. The DF-21D ASBM has generated concern with reference to its ability to undertake A2AD against U.S.A. and allied forces inside the primary Island chain, however future longer vary systems might extend A2AD south towards the Malacca and Lombok-Makassar Straits. Mark Stokes suggests that a innings capability to the DF-21D would extend PLASAF’s reach against opponent military service capabilities intent on three,000 km.[14] Such a capability, cued by ocean police work satellites, would modify China to strike at military service vessels from Hainan Island to well south of the Malacca Strait and simply north of the Lombok Strait.

In conclusion, the essential demand to make sure China’s energy security, and therefore the status invested with in building the Maritime trade route argues for China to start building the suggests that to guard its interests. From Beijing’s perspective, it cannot simply specialize in countering intervention within the event of a conflict over Taiwan, or as a results of maritime disputes within the East China ocean and South China ocean. The task of making certain China’s maritime trade and energy security, and countering the danger of a foreign blockade is rising as a crucial strategic interest that has got to form the PLA’s future to a larger degree. As is going on before, China might nevertheless surprise U.S.A. as its military modernization surges ahead to satisfy new challenges.

Dr. Malcolm Davis is Associate in Nursing professor and Post-Doctoral analysis Fellow in China-Western relations at Bond University, Queensland, Australia. he's carrying out a book for Routledge UK on Chinese military modernization within the twenty first Century. Image credit: CC by military service Surface Warriors/Flickr.

China-Pakistan Economic Corridor
The history of Pakistan and China relations can be outlined since 1950. Both neighbor Countries China and Pakistan maintain their strong relationship in a very fruitful and expressed way. Even though confusion over some subjects, especially during the first two decades from 1950s and 1970s, effected the ties but the both nations never let them blemished. Chinese and Pakistani and their Policy Makers all of them supported and motivated each other for not breaking up such productive relations and helped each other in critical situations. Pakistan is helping China to connect to the world in terms of trade while China is helping Pakistan in enhancing the growth of the economy by investing in different energy and transportation projects.

Pakistani air space was available for the Chinese airline and PIA also remove difficulties for Chinese people for traveling. Pakistan did also advocate and support the entrance of China in UN system and accepted China as the permanent member of United Nations Security Council. In addition, Pakistan also facilitated to arrange visit of Henry Kissinger to China, which placed the groundwork for the visit of President Nixon in 1972. Meanwhile, China did also help Pakistan in the period when there was a need to build military and economic abilities, especially Heavy Mechanical Complex, Taxila in 1968. At the stage of the imposition of sanctions USA in 1980s, 1990s and 2000s, China did assist Pakistan in every field. After the war of Afghanistan, USA left Pakistan to deal with many troubles, in that period China did come forward to aid Pakistan. In 1990s, when America imposed sanction on Pakistan, China after the supposed contract on missile and nuclear programme. China opposed to this force and did not dis-continue helping Pakistan. Andrew Small (2015) was of the inspection that most of the treaty and collaboration were concealed in efforts to avoid condemnation of others. He coined a term “Cooperation in Shadows” to describe the relation. Over the years both countries build up a strong tie of trust.

Trust always has been the major component of strong relationships. Chinese foreign policy gives a particular spotlight on Pakistan in future actions of China. China-Pakistan Economic Corridor is one of the most well-known examples of that. The two stats had been mutually working on the idea for a long time (almost twenty years). China and Pakistan are struggling to move slowly and smoothly as the process to apply the final segment. Combined Deceleration in 2003, during the visit of President Musharraf, is first document meanwhile President Zardari Claims that CPEC was the plan of Benazir not President Musharraf , but according to the documents by President Musharraf in 2003 which were outlined the future cooperation strategies of both countries. Later, Free Trade Agreement was signed in 2006, which boost up the trade. Trade increased by $15.15 billion in 2015 from $1 billion in 1998 (VANDEWALLE, 2015). The two governments have designed the preparation to increase the trade to $18 billion till 2018 .

Former President of Pakistan Asif Ali Zardari did also practice the entire enlargement of the growth very energetically to protect CPEC and cooperation from China during the last government of Pakistan People Party Parliamentarians. Presently, The government has been doing efforts in keeping the force and is actively, energetically engaged with Chinese government. President Xi at the time of his visit along with the Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif inaugurated some projects. Economic consequences of the CPEC are on extreme while it will provide a momentum to economic growth and development. BMA capital investigated the CPEC on national economy. Firstly, they split up the total investment in two categories, Local and Chinese investment.

Secondly, they did analysis on the probable impact of investment on national GDP. According to BMA Capital, single unit incremental growth in GDP, there is a requirement of 3.6 units of incremental investment. GDP growth will also be increased at the growth rate of 1.5 per cent by the implementation of CPEC in next three years; likewise it will further improve the private investment just because of the positive environment, economic opportunities, enhanced infrastructure, make the economy constant economy and generation of much needed energy. Private investment will add 0.5 per cent to the GDP of country (Table-). Cumulative impact of investment would be 02 per cent during 2016-2018. It is expected that growth rate during that period would be beyond 6 percent per year. (Naseem , 2015)

Despite this vast prospective, CPEC is delimited by the controversies on the route as Baluchistan and KPK argue that the government has distorted preliminary route with biasness. Argument ongoing to appear by the ending of 2013 and beginning of 2014. PSDP allotment in 2014-15 made it quickly and the government did not raise any voice on the issue and kept silence. Later, the government persisted that there would not be any change in the geopolitical structure and will remain same as designed with the mutual agreement between two parties i.e. two stats. in the meantime, an encouragement movements has began that there would be two geographical ways, that is Eastern and the Western, in the meantime Western route will be prioritized.

Budgetary allotment were/are dissimilar to the government asserts for the priority to the western route. Distribution shows that the government is spotlighting more on Eastern route and is giving not as much of preference to the Western geographic alignments. Dr Qasir, did also made an attempt to conclude the dispute and presented rationale for an action on any geographic way. He analyzed on the origin of land, population and production factors (Table-3). He further added the essential route in the debate. According to him, the Presentation on the issue in 2005 only enclosed the central route.

He completed the debate with the statement “Eastern route would be costly on the basis of production loss, population displacement and loss of productive land” (Bengali, 2015). He also talked about the mid of the geographical way and declared the route as original route. This route was planned and presented by Deputy Chairman of Planning commission, in his presentation to President Musharraf in 2006. He further submitted highlighted the revitalization of first route. Additionally, he anticipated that in the current debate of Eastern and Western both routes, main concern should be given to Western route rather than the Eastern route. Regardless of the importunacy of CPEC for Pakistan, there is another measurement.

CPEC also has special consequences for China along with the future role as great power of China throughout the globe. In the meantime, China deems to be the connectivity of regions as a primary constituent and initial step to increase its role at worldwide rank. President Xi, while addressing to the Foreign affairs committee at Communist Party meeting in 2014, said “we will give priority to neighbours in our diplomacy on all fronts” (Xi Jinping, 2014). Other element of strategy is to developed relations with developing countries and resource rich, as well as energy rich, countries.

It will facilitate Chinese brand in a positive manner as the development partner and noninterfering helper (Godement, 2014). The Saudia Arabia and Egypt visit of President Xi (and Iran will be final destination) is one more stair towards the enhancement of the friend’s periphery, on the lines defined in foreign policy. China has made an offer in which there will be a Chinese investment of $55 billion for the Middle East as credit finance for the enlargement of industry, road, infrastructure, and energy sector. The President Xi was there in the opening of joint oil refinery project in Saudi Arabia. Both countries with the mutual agreement decided to work on “Comprehensive Strategic Partnership” agenda.

Regardless of the said facts it is essential to mention the most important statement of the President of China Mr. Xi was in the Egypt, as he said: “We are not setting up proxies or building a sphere of influence in the region” (abc, 2016). This is accurately in line with the procedure of China to boost the productive rendezvous. All the investments in the region will heighten the rater of trade and Chinese products would surely be in grand required of the worldwide countries. It would be trouble-free to recognize the importance of CPEC after looking at the above mentioned developments.

Now come to the location of China Pakistan Economic Corridor, the Strategic location of CPEC is cortical, as it is situated at the meeting point of Road Belt and Maritime Belt (Shah, 2015). It will give opportunity to the China for setting up and building up its position in Indian Ocean. It will further protect the route of the power projects from Middle East and Africa, which is unfavorable for the future of the developments of China. Geographical ways of power projects will further abridged noticeably (Bhattacharjee, 2015).

It would not be so difficult and cost effective for China to reach the Middle East and North African Markets, among others. This research investigates the facts and figures which show that the CPEC is perilously important for China and Pakistan. To conquer the economic development, social and energy problems CPEC is the necessitate for the Pakistan by which Pakistan can make improvements in Energy sector, Transportation which includes Karakoram Highway, Karachi – Lahore Highway, Peshawar Railway track and many other projects which boost up the whole economy of the Pakistan. On the Other hand China needs CPEC to increase its size of trade through Pakistan China can easily export their goods Via Gawadar Port one belt- one road and the Malacca dilemma will also be resolved and China can easily made the export and import of goods, Pakistan later on cannot block the way as China has investment in Pakistan and has shares as well on the each project so China will also enlarge its margin of influence, consolidate its worldwide presence and protecting the upcoming supply routes of power sector. Nevertheless, important point of noticing is that idea was discovered by China, as part of its policy “Go Global 2001”. Pakistan is playing a very significant role in fulfilling the dream of Chinese. Consequently, it is sensible for Pakistan to keep focusing on the economic growth of the country rather than wasting time on trivial issues as in the seminar on CPEC at Auditorium SZABIST 90 on 21th April in which Mr Deshmukh shows the billboard of the branch of Commercial Bank on which Chinese language was written in it, he also referred the TVC ad in which Chinese girl was the main character in that TVC he said where are we going, referring to the same seminar one person in the audience raised the question that British People came in the sub continent with agenda of investing and they ruled for 200 years so is the history going to repeat, but the research found pros and pros of CPEC, it is essential here to mention that the Provincialism should not be given the opportunity to hijack the development agenda by any stakeholder, including the federal government as the idea of the CPEC was proposed by China and both side’s policy makers were equally .

Recommendation

1. Government must make decision on the basis of economic gains and multiplier impact on the economy
2. Route prioritization must decided on the basis of population density (directly relates to population displacement), productive land under the route, loss of production
3. Strategic importance and its relevance for Pakistan in short and long run must given due importance
4. Transparency must be ensured for smooth functioning and equal distribution of benefits
5. Government must use the existing institutions (Council for Common Interest) for resolving all controversies related to CPEC Last, but the most important aspect, all stakeholders must have good understanding of Chinese needs, as China is investor of the project.

References

1. Arif, K. (1984) Documents on China-Pakistan Relations. Lahore: Vanguard.
2. Bengali, K. (2015) China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and Route Controversy. [online] Chief Minister Policy Reform Unit, Government of Balochistan. Available at: http://cmpru.gob.pk/reports/CPEC.pdf [Accessed 28 Jan. 2016].
3. Bhattacharjee, D. (2015) China Pakistan Economic Corridor. SSRN Electronic Journal.
4. Chaudhri, M. (1970) Pakistan and the great powers. Karachi: Council for Pakistan Studies.
5. Chaudhri, M. A. (1987) ‘Strategic and Military Dimensions in Pakistan-China Relations’ in Pakistan and World Society. Karachi: Royal Book Company, pp.67- 94.
6. Dixit, A. (1987) ‘Sino-Paki Relations and Their Implications for India. Strategic Analysis,11(9),1067-1080
7. Fmprc.gov.cn, (2003) China-Pakistan Joint Declaration. [online] Available at: http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjdt_665385/2649_665393/t40148.shtml [Accessed 18 Jan. 2016].
8. François Godement, “China’s Neighbourhood Policy”, European Council on Foreign Relations, Asia Centre, China Analysis, February (2014), http:// www.ecfr.eu/page/-
9. Godement, F. (2014) China’s Neighbourhood Policy. European Council on Foreign Relations, Asia Centre, China Analysis.
10. Jain, R. (1981) China South Asian relations, 1947-1980. New Delhi: Radiant.
11. Javaid, U. and Jahangir, A. (2015) ‘Pakistan-China Strategic Relationship: A Glorious Journey of 55 Years’, JRSP, 52(01), pp.157-183.
12. Kabraji, R. (2012) The China-Pakistan Alliance: Rhetoric and Limitations. Chatham House Asia Programme.
13. Naseem, A. (2015) Impact of China Pak Economic Corridor - A Bird’s Eye View. [online] Islamabad: BMA Capital. Available at: http://investorguide360.com/ wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Impact-of-China-Pak-Economic-Corridor_-A-Birds-Eye-View.pdf [Accessed 28 Jan. 2016].
14. News ABC, (2016) Chinese President Xi Jinping tours Middle East, inks deals worth billions in bid for influence. [online] Available at: http:// www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-22/china-president-visits-middle-east-inks-deals-worth-billions/7106292 [Accessed 28 Jan. 2016].
15. President Xi Jinping Speech at Communist Party meeting 2014
16. Shah, S. (2015) ‘China‟s Xi Jinping Launches Investment Deal in Pakistan’, The Wall Street Journal, [Online]. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/ chinas-xi-jinping-set-to-launch-investment-deal-in-pakistan-1429533767
17. Shah, S. (2015). China’s Xi Jinping Launches Investment Deal in Pakistan. The Wall Street Journal.. [online] Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/ chinas-xi-jinping-set-to-launch-investment-deal-in-pakistan-1429533767 [Accessed 08 Jan. 2016].
18. Small, A. (2015) China-Pakistan: A Strategic Relationship in the Shadows. [Blog] Yale Global Online. Available at: http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/chinapakistan-strategic-relations-shadows [Accessed 28 Jan. 2016].
19. State Department, United States of America,
20. Syed, A. (1974) China & Pakistan. Amherst, Mass: University of Massachusetts Press.
21. VANDEWALLE, L. (2015) ‘In-depth Analysis Pakistan and China: 'Iron Brothers' Forever?’, Policy department European Parliament, [online] 549(052). Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/549052/EXPO_IDA(2015)549052_EN.pdf [Accessed 24 Jan. 2016].
22. Vaughn, B. and Morrison, W. (2006) China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States. Congressional Research Service ̃, The Library of Congress.
23. Wang, J. (2015) ‘China’s ‘New Silk road’: A case study in Eu–China relations. In: Amighini, A. & Berkofsky, A. ed’, Xi’s Policy Gambles: The Bumpy Road Ahead (pp. 92–109). Beijing: ISPI.
24. Xu, S. (2015) ‘Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road’, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China, with State Council authorization, (2015). [online] Available at: http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201503/t20150330_669367.html [Accessed 22 Nov. 2015].