You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Cotton Coin: A Long Needed Solution that Saves Lives
For your Qs:
- American cotton has shifted between shame and pride over the centuries.
- Relatively, our supply chain is the least vague in the world. Realistically, anything that is from a provider navigates that same labyrinth of red tape strolling through D.C.
- IBM, Oracle and others are already tackling bc. They know its power. Americans as a whole will adopt bc when it has matured and proves itself a powerful technology or becomes popular.
America needs bc for more than profits, but then there is poverty and death in America in the downtrodden population. People educated by the system are passed over for people who burden the very system that chooses them. I am not discussing communism here; I am illustrating the adoption of innovation. Americans bailed out the big banks in a way that a communist country would. Part of the response was to develop blockchain technology. Computers have certainly changed our world and the richer countries can afford to resist the most significant changes the longest.
I do not want to get into politics here, but here is an illustration:
- Venezuela is poor so it turns to innovation (blockchain.) America is rich so it want to forcefully stop a Venezuelan blockchain. - Same old story of people in power who have past their prime.
Hmmmm... you have power driven analysis here
From what you have said the poor countries of the world should push forward towards the revolution of blockchain as that might not be given to them by the richer Nations who have a stable systems and economy
Agreed, poorer nations should innovate (i.e. blockchain).
Wealthy nations will be too concerned to even see poor nations. They have a lot to manage and giving blockchain technology will not be in their plans.
Consider the computer company Apple. With Steve Jobs it was in constant innovation because Jobs new that computers and innovation go hand in hand. But Apple got so big that it needed to shift its focus toward managing all of it sales. Logistics became the focus and its graphical advantages started fall.
Poorer nations should innovate and certainly not follow wealthy nations all the time because what works for the rich does not always work for the poor. It is often better to take chances with innovation and learn along the way than to follow money that has access to things that the poor simply do not.
sorry I had some technical issues
you know this things cannot be trusted
.............when you are in the third world
but having again in the main stream of my events make me wan to sky dive
From time to time, I hear about connectivity issues in some places. I am rather well blessed in getting and staying online. Not that it makes me enough money to be considered minimum wage (even with a master's degree).
Sky diving is awesome. I did once and would love to free fall again. Have you been?
I totally agree with you on this one
innovation will serve emerging economies
than what it do for the richer ones
you really have so much information to share on this subject
I am from the NJYC metro area. My runs would take me past the UN. I was schooled within the primary financial district (it is on the NJ side- not many people realize that NYC focuses on moving (trading) goods while NJC focuses on money). While I prefer the financial markets to politics, I have found politics inescapable.
While I prefer the financial markets to politics, I have found politics
lol.................. this is a bit funny if you ask me..................
I love them both be prefer the first..lol
i
:)