EVIDENCE OF CONTAGIOUS MOST EXHAUSTIVE RESEARCH TODAY CONCERNING COVID
The source...,
FROM THEIR MOUTH THESE 5 Sources THERE IS NO TEST that proves anything:
Nothing I said was according to me...I show the source..., the WORDS of
- CDC:
- Leading pathologists
- the inventor of the ONLY tests used Dr. Kary Mullis
- government and the
- National Institute of Health
FROM THEIR MOUTH THESE 5 Sources THERE IS NO TEST that proves anything.
In the WORDS of the
- CDC:
There is no test that verifies a contagious virus...
the problem is when you look on
the CDC website it says right on the
description for Research Use Only...
Not for diagnostic purposes for
Research Use Only... not for diagnostic
purposes... and then it says the CDC is
making no claims for their validity https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/rt-pcr-panel-primer-probes.html
WHO IS THE CDC?
CDC: Is a non profit that sells fear to sell vaccinations
CDC Members Own More Than 50 Patents Connected to Vaccinations
The CDC Immunization Safety Office is responsible for investigating the safety and effectiveness of all new vaccinations; once an investigation is considered complete, a recommendation is then made to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) who then determines whether the new vaccine will be added to the current vaccination schedule. Members of the ACIP committee include physicians such as Dr. Paul Offit, who also serves as the chief of infectious diseases at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Offit and other CDC members own numerous patents associated with vaccinations and regularly receive funding for their research work from the very same pharmaceutical companies who manufacturer vaccinations which are ultimately sold to the public. This situation creates an obvious conflict of interest, as members of the ACIP committee benefit financially every time a new vaccination is released to the market.
Members of the ACIP Committee Directly Influence Public Health
Each of the 12 members of the CDC's ACIP Committee has a significant influence on the health of nearly every member of the American population. Because they are responsible for adding to and/or altering the national vaccine schedule, it is of critical importance that they remain objective and unbiased before determining whether a new vaccination is appropriate for use, particularly in the bodies of vulnerable young children. Unfortunately, a significant number of ACIP committee members receive direct financial returns when more vaccinations are added to the current schedule. Many own vaccination related patent(s) and/or stock shares of the pharmaceutical companies responsible for supplying new vaccines to the public. Others receive research grant money, funding for their academic departments, or payments for the oversight of vaccine safety trials.
- Leading pathologists:
ESP Webinar video recordings – COVID-19: Unprecedented Daily Challenges in Pathology Departments across Europe
May 8 2020 Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov,
President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association
“No one has died from the coronavirus”
Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association
A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.
Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.
Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.
He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.
These stunning statements raise major questions, including about officials’ and scientists’ claims regarding the many vaccines they’re rushing into clinical trials around the world.
They also raise doubt about the veracity of claims of discovery of anti-novel-coronavirus antibodies (which are beginning to be used to treat patients).
Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).
And they’re purportedly key to the immunity certificates coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of the COVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK, US, and Canada.
Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8, 2020, European Society of Pathology (ESP) webinar on COVID-19.
The May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health. The video is on the BPA’s website, which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov’s main points.
We asked a native Bulgarian speaker with a science background to orally translate the video interview into English. We then transcribed her translation. The video is here and our English transcript is here.
Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found.
The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters. These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology.
This is done via immunohistochemistry, which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them. After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they’re specific for, the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they’re bound to – are located.
Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.
It would be easy to dismiss Dr. Alexov as just another crank ‘conspiracy theorist.’ After all many people believe they’re everywhere these days, spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and other issues.
In addition, little of what Dr. Alexov alleges was the consensus from the May 8 webinar is in the publicly viewable parts of the proceedings.
But keep in mind that whistleblowers often stand alone because the vast majority of people are afraid to speak out publicly.
Also, Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation. He’s been a physician for 30 years. He’s president of the BPA, a member of the ESP’s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.
On top of that, there’s other support for what Dr. Alexov is saying.
For example, the director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there’s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19’s lethality.
“COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection,” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April. Adding in another interview:
In quite a few cases, we have also found that the current corona infection has nothing whatsoever to do with the fatal outcome because other causes of death are present,
for example, a brain hemorrhage or a heart attack […] [COVID-19 is] not particularly dangerous viral disease […] All speculation about individual deaths that have not been expertly examined only fuel anxiety.”
Also, one of us (Rosemary) and another journalist, Amory Devereux, documented in a June 9 Off-Guardian article that the novel coronavirus has not fulfilled Koch’s postulates.
These postulates are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease.
We showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19. Nor has the virus has been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness.
In addition, in a June 27 Off-Guardian article two more journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, added to the evidence that “the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.”
The pair also confirmed “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”
Dr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that:
the main conclusion [of those of us who participated in the May 8 webinar] was that the autopsies that were conducted in Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Sweden do not show that the virus is deadly.”
He added that:
What all of the pathologists said is that there’s no one who has died from the coronavirus. I will repeat that: no one has died from the coronavirus.”
Dr. Alexov also observed there is no proof from autopsies that anyone deemed to have been infected with the novel coronavirus died only from an inflammatory reaction sparked by the virus (presenting as interstitial pneumonia) rather than from other potentially fatal diseases.
Another revelation of his is that:
“We need to see exactly how the law will deal with immunization and that vaccine that we’re all talking about, because I’m certain it’s [currently] not possible to create a vaccine against COVID. I’m not sure what exactly Bill Gates is doing with his laboratories – is it really a vaccine he’s producing, or something else?”
As pointed to above, the inability to identify monoclonal antibodies for the virus suggests there is no basis for the vaccines, serological testing and immunity certificates being rolled out around the globe at unprecedented speed and cost. In fact, there is no solid evidence the virus exists.
Dr. Alexov made still more important points. For example, he noted that, in contrast to the seasonal influenza, SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t been proven to kill youth:
[With the flu] we can find one virus which can cause a young person to die with no other illness present […] In other words, the coronavirus infection is an infection that does not lead to death. And the flu can lead to death.”
(There have been reports of severe maladies such as Kawasaki-like disease and stroke in young people who were deemed to have a novel-coronavirus infection. However, the majority of published papers on these cases are very short and include only one or only a small handful of patients.
Moreover, commenters on the papers note it’s impossible to determine the role of the virus because the papers’ authors did not control sufficiently, if at all, for confounding factors. It’s most likely that children’s deaths attributed to COVID-19 in fact are from multiple organ failure resulting from the combination of the drug cocktail and ventilation that these children are subjected to.)
Dr. Alexov therefore asserted that:
the WHO is creating worldwide chaos, with no real facts behind what they’re saying.”
Among the myriad ways the WHO is creating that chaos is by prohibiting almost all autopsies of people deemed to have died from COVID-19. As a result, reported Dr. Alexov, by May 13 only three such autopsies had been conducted in Bulgaria.
Also, the WHO is dictating that everyone said to be infected with the novel coronavirus who subsequently dies must have their deaths attributed to COVID-19.
“That’s quite stressful for us, and for me in particular, because we have protocols and procedures which we need to use,” he told Dr. Katsarov. “…And another pathologist 100 years from now is going to say, ‘Hey, those pathologists didn’t know what they were doing [when they said the cause of death was COVID-19]!’ So we need to be really strict with our diagnoses, because they could be proven [or disproven], and they could be checked again later.”
He disclosed that pathologists in several countries in Europe, as well as in China, Australia and Canada are strongly resisting the pressure on them to attribute deaths to COVID-19 alone:
I’m really sad that we need to follow the [WHO’s] instructions without even thinking about them. But in Germany, France, Italy and England they’re starting to think that we shouldn’t follow the WHO so strictly, and [instead] when we’re writing the cause of death we should have some pathology [results to back that up] and we should follow the protocol. [That’s because] when we say something we need to be able to prove it.”
(He added that autopsies could have helped confirm or disprove the theory that many of the people deemed to have died of COVID-19 in Italy had previously received the H1N1 flu vaccine. Because, as he noted, the vaccine suppresses adults’ immune systems and therefore may have been a significant contributor to their deaths by making them much more susceptible to infection.)
Drs. Alexov and Katsarov agreed that yet another aspect of the WHO-caused chaos and its fatal consequences is many people are likely to die soon from diseases such as cancer because the lockdowns, combined with the emptying of hospitals (ostensibly to make room for COVID-19 patients), halted all but the most pressing procedures and treatments.
They also observed these diseases are being exacerbated by the fear and chaos surrounding COVID-19.
We know that stress significantly suppresses the immune system, so I can really claim 200% that all the chronic diseases will be more severe and more acute per se.
Specifically in situ carcinoma – over 50% of these are going to become more invasive […] So I will say that this epidemic isn’t so much an epidemic of the virus, it’s an epidemic of giving people a lot of fear and stress.”
In addition, posited Dr. Alexov, as another direct and dire result of the pandemic panic many people are losing faith in physicians.
Because in my opinion the coronavirus isn’t that dangerous, and how are people going to have trust in me doing cancer pathology, much of which is related to viruses as well? But nobody is talking about that.”
We emailed Dr. Alexov several questions, including asking why he believes it’s impossible to create a vaccine against COVID-19.
He didn’t answer the questions directly. Dr. Alexov instead responded:
We also emailed five of Dr. Alexov’s colleagues in the ESP asking them to confirm Dr. Alexov’s revelations. We followed up by telephone with two of them. None responded.
Why didn’t Dr. Alexov or his five colleagues answer our questions?
We doubt it’s due to lack of English proficiency.
It’s more likely because of the pressure on pathologists to follow the WHO’s directives and not speak out publicly. (And, on top of that, pathology departments depend on governments for their funding.)
Nonetheless, pathologists like Drs. Alexov and Püschel appear to be willing to step out and say that no one has died from a novel-coronavirus infection.
Perhaps that’s because pathologists’ records and reputations are based on hard physical evidence rather than on subjective interpretation of tests, signs and symptoms. And there is no hard physical evidence that COVID-19 is deadly.
COVID-19:
Unprecedented Daily Challenges in Pathology
Departments across Europe
Discover more in the link following in the original post, full interview, full webinar, full disclosure, unlike your government’s.
- the inventor of the ONLY tests used Dr. Kary Mullis :
Kary Mullis was a scientist. He never spoke like a globalist, and said once, memorably, when accused of making statements about HIV that could endanger lives: “I’m a scientist. I’m not a lifeguard.” That’s a very important line in the sand. Somebody who goes around claiming they are “saving lives,” is a very dangerous animal, and you should run in the opposite direction when you encounter them.
Their weapon is fear, and their favorite word is “could.” They entrap you with a form of bio-debt, creating simulations of every imaginable thing that “could” happen, yet hasn’t.
Bill Gates has been waiting a long time for a virus with this much, as he put it, “pandemic potential.” But Gates has a problem, and it’s called PCR.
Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?
What does HIV have to do with Covid-19?
PCR played a central role in the HIV war (a war you don’t know about, that lasted 22 years, between Globalist post-modern HIV scientists and classical scientists.)
The latter lost the war. Unless you count being correct as winning. The relentless violence finally silenced the opposition, and it seemed nobody would ever learn who these scientists were, or why they fought this thing so adamantly and passionately.
And PCR, though its inventor died last year, and isn’t here to address it, plays a central role in Corona terrorism.
Here is an outtake from an article I published in SPIN, in 1994, about Kary Mullis, PCR, HIV and…Tony Fauci:
“PCR has also had a great impact on the field of AIDS, or rather, HIV research. PCR can, among other things, detect HIV in people who test negative to the HIV antibody test.
The word “eccentric” seems to come up often in connection with Mullis’ name: His first published scientific paper, in the premier scientific journal Nature in 1986, described how he viewed the universe while on LSD – pocked with black holes containing antimatter, for which time runs backward.
But it is his views on AIDS that have really set the scientific establishment fuming.
Mullis, like his friend and colleague Dr. Peter Duesberg, does not believe that AIDS is caused by the retrovirus HIV. He is a long-standing member of the Group for the Reappraisal of the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis, the 500-member protest organization pushing for a re-examination of the cause of AIDS.
One of Duesberg’s strongest arguments in the debate has been that the HIV virus is barely detectable in people who suffer from AIDS. Ironically, when PCR was applied to HIV research, around 1989, researchers claimed to have put this complaint to rest. Using the new technology, they were suddenly able to see viral particles in the quantities they couldn’t see before.
Scientific articles poured forth stating that HIV was now 100 times more prevalent than was previously thought. But Mullis himself was unimpressed. “PCR made it easier to see that certain people are infected with HIV,” he told Spin in 1992, “and some of those people came down with symptoms of AIDS. But that doesn’t begin even to answer the question, ‘Does HIV cause it?'”
Mullis then went on to echo one of Duesberg’s most controversial claims. “Human beings are full of retroviruses,” he said, “We don’t know if it is hundreds or thousands or hundreds of thousands. We’ve only recently started to look for them. But they’ve never killed anybody before. People have always survived retroviruses.”
Mullis challenged the popular wisdom that the disease-causing mechanisms of HIV are simply too “mysterious” to comprehend. “The mystery of that damn virus,” he said at the time, “has been generated by the $2 billion a year they spend on it. You take any other virus, and you spend $2 billion, and you can make up some great mysteries about it too.”
Like so many great scientific discoveries, the idea for PCR came suddenly, as if by direct transmission from another realm. It was during a late-night drive in 1984, the same year, ironically, that HIV was announced to be the “probable” cause of AIDS.
“I was just driving and thinking about ideas and suddenly I saw it,” Mullis recalls. “I saw the polymerase chain reaction as clear as if it were up on a blackboard in my head, so I pulled over and started scribbling.” A chemist friend of his was asleep in the car, and, as Mullis described in a recent special edition of Scientific American: “Jennifer objected groggily to the delay and the light, but I exclaimed I had discovered something fantastic. Unimpressed, she went back to sleep.”
Mullis kept scribbling calculations, right there in the car, until the formula for DNA amplification was complete. The calculation was based on the concept of “reiterative exponential growth processes,” which Mullis had picked up from working with computer programs.
After much table-pounding, he convinced the small California biotech company he was working for, Cetus, that he was on to something. Good thing they finally listened: They sold the patent for PCR to Hoffman-LaRoche for the staggering sum of $300 million – the most money ever paid for a patent. Mullis meanwhile received a $10,000 bonus.
Our talk focused on AIDS. Though Mullis has not been particularly vocal about his HIV skepticism, his convictions have not, to his credit, been muddled or softened by his recent success and mainstream acceptability. He seems to revel in his newly acquired power. “They can’t pooh-pooh me now, because of who I am,” he says with a chuckle – and by all accounts, he’s using that power effectively.
When ABC’s “Nightline” approached Mullis about participating in a documentary on himself, he instead urged them to focus their attention on the HIV debate. “That’s a much more important story,” he told the producers, who up to that point had never acknowledged the controversy. In the end, “Nightline” ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources.
The show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didn’t fulfill Mullis’ ultimate fantasy. “What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.”
But I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as he’s always done.
“I know he will,” Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. “But you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, ‘This is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,’ and let the cameras follow. If people think I’m a crazy person, that’s okay. But here’s a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. It’s a visual thing. I’m not unwilling to do something like that.”
He pauses, then continues. “And I don’t care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.”
While many people, even within the ranks of the HIV dissidents, have of late tried to distance themselves from the controversial Duesberg, Mullis defends him passionately and seems genuinely concerned about his fate.
“I was trying to stress this point to the ABC people” he says, “that Peter has been abused seriously by the scientific establishment, to the point where he can’t even do any research. Not only that, but his whole life is pretty much in disarray because of this, and it is only because he has refused to compromise his scientific moral standards.
There ought to be some goddamn private foundation in the country, that would say, ‘Well, we’ll move in where the NIH [National Institutes of Health] dropped off. We’ll take care of it. You just keep right on saying what you’re saying, Peter. We think you’re an asshole, and we think you are wrong, but you’re the only dissenter, and we need one, because it’s science, it’s not religion.’ And that was one of the reasons why I cooperated with ABC.”
“I am waiting to be convinced that we’re wrong,” Mullis continues. “I know it ain’t going to happen. But if it does, I will tell you this much – I will be the first person to admit it. A lot of people studying this disease are looking for the clever little pathways they can piece together, that will show how this works. Like, ‘What if this molecule was produced by this one and then this one by this one, and then what if this one and that one induces this one’ – that stuff becomes, after two molecules, conjecture of the rankest kind.
People who sit there and talk about it don’t realize that molecules themselves are somewhat hypothetical, and that their interactions are more so, and that the biological reactions are even more so.
You don’t need to look that far. You don’t discover the cause of something like AIDS by dealing with incredibly obscure things. You just look at what the hell is going on. Well, here’s a bunch of people that are practicing a new set of behavioral norms. Apparently, it didn’t work because a lot of them got sick. That’s the conclusion. You don’t necessarily know why it happened. But you start there.”
http://aidswiki.net/index.php?title=Document:Farber_interviews_Mullis
That was a historical detour, shared in hopes of rooting this conversation historically.
When you see the word “cases” on your TV screen, in this world that has now been hijacked by one single event, one dread, one Idol, you will be forgiven for thinking those are cases of Covid-19.
The number of “cases” is often a very big number, back-lit in red. Today for example, the number of “total cases,” in the US, according to Worldometer, is 309,728. The total death figure is 8,441. “Active cases,” is 286,546, of which 8,206 are “Serious, Critical.” The number of “new deaths” is 1,037, and the number of “total recovered” is 14,741.
I’m not clear what an “active” case is. Does that mean fully symptomatic? Partially symptomatic? If the latter, it surely encompasses influenza/pneumonia, which has magically, as many have observed, dropped off a cliff for 2020.
In China, generally, they diagnose ‘Corona’ with CT scans and one or two positive PCR tests. In the US, it’s difficult to find out what makes a “case,” ie what the case definition is. Absent CT scans, we are in a bio-tech free-fall.
One website offers this distressingly unclear definition: “The novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, has been spreading worldwide, resulting in growing numbers of infected individuals since late 2019 and increased mortality numbers since early 2020. So far, experts have seen that while there are severe cases, the infection is usually mild with non-specific symptoms. And there are no trademark clinical features of COVID-19 infection.”
There are no trademark clinical features? What then, collapsed the world? I sure hope this isn’t all riding on a “test,” as bio-tech Oracle.
A few graphs down, my fears are confirmed: “Diagnosis of COVID-19 involves laboratory tests. Once someone has been diagnosed with the coronavirus, additional diagnostic tests may be done to determine the severity of the infection.”
I accept that “something is going on” that overlaps with flu, but reportedly worse than a normal flu. That’s what we’re hearing. It involves an acute lack of oxygen, for reasons unclear. People can’t breathe. Intubation is a serious, potentially dangerous procedure that begs many questions—but that’s for a future article.
What is the relationship between the spread of testing and the “spread” of a new virus? How do we know what we are experiencing, in comparison to what we are assuming we are experiencing?
One study in Austria found that increased testing correlated with, no surprise, increased “cases.”
In an email discussion between a group of international scientists, academics and MD’s, the question was posed whether the daily number of new cases would track with the daily number of tests.
“Yes, they do,” wrote Austrian MD Christian Fiala. “Here are the data from Austria. In other words if they want to further increase the number of ‘infected‘ people, they have to also increase the number of tests. However, that is physically impossible.
Another aspect: during the first weeks most tests were done on sick people. Therefore, the percentage of positive tests was relatively high. But there are not so many sick people and with the general roll out of tests, the vast majority of those tested will be healthy.
Consequently, the percentage of positive tests will be low, and most will be false positive.
In other words, it is impossible to continue the increase of positive test results.”
No Clinical Virological research since 1933 has been able to demonstrate or prove a link between a virus and contagion. NOT ONE!
COVID TEST DOESN’T TEST FOR COVID
10 Things You Should Know About COVID Testing
- The process used for COVID testing has always been deemed “an invention”, as it was never qualified as a test. This invention is called PCR, standing for polymerase chain reaction.
- The inventor of PCR, Kary B. Mullis, said “these PCR tests cannot detect infectious free viruses at all.” That’s direct from the inventor of PCR.
- The PCR was invented to merely have bits of genetic material in a sample multiply until those small broken pieces were numerous enough to see under a microscope. PCR just helps scientists observe small things in greater quantity. Where those bits of genetic material came from, what they do, do they make people sick etc…..the PCR process is not involved in that determination what so ever.
- In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, the entire virus (the complete genetic sequence) must be isolated in its entirety. This has not yet been done with COVID 19. This is correct. No complete virus has yet to be isolated and that’s supposed to be the first step before any other steps are taken in such a process that ends with a viral declaration…let alone a pandemic declaration.
- In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, the entire virus (which has never been isolated for COVID) must be transferred over to another animal or human host…..and that virus MUST cause the exact same illness in the host. This has not yet been done with COVID-19. The COVID19 virus has not yet been proven to cause disease, person to person. Why are these steps being bypassed?
- In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, the entire virus (which has never been isolated for COVID-19) must not only infect the host with the exact same disease, you must also find the complete genetic viral sequence in the infected tissue of the host and then re-isolate the entire genetic sequence from infected tissues of the host. This has not yet been done with COVID-19. Disease transmission person to person, has not been proven for COVID-19. This is the easiest criteria to organize yet it remains undone.
- In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, you must also have a control group, so you can make sure that what you call a virus isn’t just regular human genetic material, shared by all humans. If you find the exact same 80% genetic material strand in the samples of HEALTHY CONTROLS, what you’re looking at CAN’T be the cause of the disease because it’s just regular genetic material found in all humans…both sick and healthy. In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, you need to find that particular complete viral sequence IN THE SICK ONLY and not in the healthy. This has not yet been done for COVID-19. Why is the gold standard of testing (having a control group) being bypassed?
- In the case of COVID-19, scientists have indeed found a string of genetic material (not a complete sequence) that shares 80% similarities with SARS-COVID (a sequence said to cause SARS) and therefore the original Chinese scientists have declared that this string of material reflects a COVID infection. (but also did that without testing any healthy people, to see if healthy people also have the same genetic material) Humans share 97% genetic material with chimpanzees, 80% genetic material with cats and 50% genetic material with a banana and that’s why shared genetic material IS NEVER the standard used to diagnose any disease. This is why the Tanzanian President recently found positive PCR results when he secretly tested a goat, fruit and motor oil….because most things on earth share similar genetic sequences.
https://www.facebook.com/RonnyakaSoniC/videos/10218867134043289/
We share 61% genetic material with fruit flies and 85% genetic material with mice. Shared material is never good enough to declare anything as concrete in real science. To declare viral disease you always need a full 100% viral genetic match to a past 100% viral genetic sequence in the past. This so far has not been done for COVID19. Why?
- The PCR INVENTION shouldn’t be used as a way to diagnose any disease because it’s simply designed to make small bits of genetic material more visible under a microscope. Those small bits were always designed to be studied, not to conclude disease or no disease, winners or losers, black or white, go home or go to “a camp” etc. Where that genetic material comes from (from you or from a large number of friendly organisms that live inside you) in no way reflects if that genetic material is making you sick. This is why the PCR process has already been shown (in its current misused way) to declare 8 out of 10 people positive with COVID, when they’re perfectly healthy. Out of 10 people in a COVID testing area, 8 will be told they have COVID, 2 will not…..and there’s absolutely no basis to any of those declarations what so ever. The PCR can’t test for COVID, it never could and the inventor said so. So why are we using it?
- This is the testing process being used to remove children from their parents, remove adults from their homes, destroy the economy, shut down the food supply, enforce martial law, destroy civil liberties, criminalize normal human activity and force an untested vaccine onto the public, while government officials have inserted into mandates (which are not laws) that both government officials and vaccine companies are not legally responsible for any “failures” in this system where citizens are killed or injured,…..all the while knowing that the COVID death and infection figures (and the testing) are already proven fraudulent.
Are you ready to go bankrupt based on COVID death numbers proven to be fabricated by government and media? Are you ready to have a child removed from your care based on a test that’s proven completely fraudulent? Are you willing to take an untested vaccine, while giving full legal immunity for death and permanent injury (and future cancers autoimmune diseases etc) to government officials and vaccine makers, based on fabricated death and infection numbers plus a fraudulent testing process?
FROM THE INVENTOR OF THE PCR INVENTION The only VIRUS TEST which was invented in 1983 said the hypothesis is false, unproductive, and unethical in 1996!
This statement nullifies any virus test and nullifies the CDC and the Mask:
“The HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake”, wrote Kary Mullis in 1996 [(1), p. 14]. Mullis – Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, 1993 – and other distinguished scientists have claimed the HIV-causes-AIDS hypothesis is false, unproductive, and unethical.
They have done so since 1984, when the hypothesis was proposed. Thirty years after countless studies, resources, and attempts to cure have been poured into the HIV-AIDS hypothesis, it may be fruitful to ask: What happened to those views and voices that once disagreed? Have the past three decades, with their scientific, technological, and public health developments, been sufficient to convince critics of the hypothesis’ value?
Have these advances been able to silence the questioning?
Here, I synthesize the main criticisms aimed at the HIV-AIDS hypothesis, alongside select unorthodox1 theories proposing non-viral cause(s) for AIDS, to argue: far from being condemned to extinction, competing explanations for, and thorough questioning of the mainstream premise persist. Perhaps better known by the lay public than by health professionals, many explanations are, in fact, attracting a growing number of sympathizers.
To support the argument, I employ historical research and data synthesis methods. I utilize, as data, trade and professional publications in tandem with authoritative scientific sources.
It is important to note that my purpose is not to review the state of the science regarding HIV/AIDS, nor to persuade readers to reject the mainstream hypothesis. Instead, I aim to expose readers to the persisting controversies, and to motivate them to raise questions of their own. Ultimately, then, this article invites the public health workforce to reflect on prevailing assumptions and practices regarding HIV-AIDS.
Reflecting on assumptions and practices represents a central task for public health professionals; a vital step to ensure their (our) practice continually grounds itself in the most rigorous ethical standards (3).
A link to the Nation Institute of Health, a US government website article:
Where Dr. Kary Mullis is quoted.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172096/
- government and the
- National Institute of Health:
The advantages of PCR are several. Compared to techniques such as cell culturing for detection of viruses, the time required for the assay can be reduced from days or weeks to hours. Both the initial and recurring costs of PCR are substantially less than the costs of cell culture techniques, and PCR is easily performed.
|
In addition, PCR can be used to identify a specific pathogen found in water. It cannot, however, be used to determine the infectious state of an organism; it can only determine the presence or absence of pathogen-specific DNA or RNA sequences.
( It does not detect a virus nor can it, it only looks for a RNA )
PCR assays have been used to detect enterovirus nucleic acid sequences in clinical (5, 13) and environmental samples (1, 3, 12).
A link to the Nation Institute of Health, a US government website article:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC91045/
There are only a few methods of
testing for kovat 19 here they are the
first one is the most common and
remember during the first two months
that's all there was people were being
diagnosed by symptoms only, the precise
presentation of the seasonal flu, those
are the symptoms that created this
phenomenon that has brought the world to
a halt.
The second way of testing for
kovat 19 antibody tests blood tests
looking for antibodies... now the problem
with this is that the philosophy of
observing antibodies in the blood has
changed a hundred and eighty degrees 15
years ago the presence of antibodies in
the blood could mean that the person had
just recovered from some health
challenges and that their their immune
system had created antibodies which was
evidence of their recovery.
Now the presence of antibodies in the blood
means that this patient is afflicted
with a pathogen that is potentially
fatal and is in need of some heroic
treatment?
So this is the way the
antibody testing for covin 19 was
conducted they would take the blood
sample if they observed any kind of
antibodies whether they were viral or
bacterial or whatever they did not
differentiate, that was a positive test
for kovat 19!
Any kind of unidentifiable
viral or otherwise debris in the blood
was also counted as a positive test.
Okay let's look at the third type of testing
the PCR the polymerase chain reaction
test this is the test where you had to
send up sample into CDC and then they would test
it with the PCR test and they would send
you back the result positive or negative
it's a completely unverifiable test as
we're going to see and we're going to go
into the specifics of why that is.
Next came the test kits now the test kits
were only sent out about a month ago
they were sent out actually in them
around the middle of around the middle
of March, the CDC sent the new test kits
to hundreds of hospitals and clinics
across the country and these test kits
were supposedly to screen out people for
kovat 19, the problem is when you look on
the CDC website it says right on the
description for experimental use only...
Not for diagnostic purposes for
experimental use only... not for diagnostic
purposes and then it says the CDC is
making no claims for their validity
So after those test kits went out to all
the hospitals about three weeks ago
that's when we saw this enormous spike
because of course right away when the
hospitals finally got a testing
procedure that they didn't have to send
in to you know Atlanta they could report
a lot more positive tests the next thing
that happened was after those first test
kits went out to the hospitals the most
recent thing that only happened a week
or so ago now is the on-site test kits
and these supposedly are claiming to be
able to take a sample from a patient and
to screen them for kovat 19 in five or
ten minutes this is completely ludicrous
it is impossible it is scientifically
untenable, these will not work at all, no
one even claims that these on-site tests
can validly differentiate anything let
alone covert 19.
The 1918 flu was not caused by a virus.
The 1918 flu was not contagious and did not spread by direct human-to-human contact.
Efforts by doctors working for the U.S. Public Health Service to prove the contagious nature of the 1918 flu were heroic and resulted in resounding and repeated failure. In November and December 1918 and in February and March 1919, they attempted to infect one hundred healthy volunteers with influenza in the following ways:
They put secretions from the mouth, nose, throat and bronchi from hospitalized influenza patients into the nose, throat and eyes of volunteers;
They injected blood from sick patients into volunteers;
They filtered mucous material from sick patients and injected it under the skin of volunteers;
They had volunteers shake hands with sick patients, talk to them, faces close together, for five minutes, then had the patient breathe out as hard as he could while the volunteer, two inches away, was breathing in, then had the patient cough directly into the face of the volunteer, five times.
None of the volunteers in any of these experiments got sick in any way.
All of this is documented in the book: the Invisible Rainbow
‣ Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.
‣ Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.
‣ Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.
‣ Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.
‣ Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place.
‣ Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.
‣ Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.
‣ Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.
‣ There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.
‣ Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste.
‣ Viruses are very specific protein structures.
‣ Coughing, sneezing, and spitting is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles.
‣ Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.
‣ Viruses are a result of internal toxicity caused by the environment.
‣ Viruses are not living organisms or living microbes.
‣ Viruses do not have a respiratory system, nor do they have a nucleus or digestive system.
‣ Viruses are not alive.
‣ Viruses are not contagious.
⸞ • ⸞ • ⸞ • ⸞ • ⸞ • ⸞ • ⸞ • ⸞
References:
thebernician.net
Béchamp Or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by E. Douglas Hume, 1923
The Blood and Its Third Element by Antoine Béchamp, 1912
Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth, by Walene James, 1942 (discusses Béchamp’s ‘Terrain Theory’ of bacteria and viruses.)
The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur, R.B. Pearson, 1942 (First published in 1942 under the title ‘Pasteur Plagiarist Imposter!-the Germ Theory Exploded’.)
The source of the germ theory from Louis Pasteur it is the same age as Béchamp’s ‘Terrain Theory’ of bacteria and viruses the topic of this status ....they came from two different people who worked together and disagreed ...
GOVERNMENTS AND MEDIA ALL OVER THE WORLD PROVEN TO BE LYING TO PUBLIC ABOUT COVID PANDEMIC
There are two Posts: With over 70 links 1) All the comments in this post Click
https://www.facebook.com/shannon.gibson.547/posts/3076381275741708 2)
Over 60 links in the comments: https://www.facebook.com/shannon.gibson.547/posts/3108477095865459?
(#1) Information regarding Viruses not being able to live outside of a host and how they are truly transmitted.
⬇️
DISMANTLING THE VIRAL THEORY
https://phoreveryoung.wordpress.com/2020/01/25/dismantling-the-viral-theory/?fbclid=IwAR0ER7vjBJ2IBKpMG9qI0G2BNpUMd13PwmwYXudRZTzXmfsPKFPpwIOdjtg
NIH ADMITS 5G CAN ACTUALLY CREATE CORONAVIRUS WITHIN HUMAN CELLS
https://www.infowars.com/nih-admits-5g-can-actually-create-coronavirus-within-human-cells/?fbclid=IwAR066OKxpU2mLHySZ8jNpwK_uYTWl7gH6agS9UJ4hiuvJyGqvFHXo9rcOIA
germ Theory vs. terrain Theory
https://www.google.com/search?q=germ+Theory+vs.+terrain+Theory&gs_ivs=1
The National institute of health, The National Library of Medicine
This is from the people you trust to keep you safe...the Government.
Abstract
In this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological cells.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668870/
The Deception of Virology — Why Coronavirus Is Not Contagious
A video that will show you it is 9 minutes...
the video is validated with credits at the end
You know you can spend 9 minutes to see a different perspective.
Why The “Coronavirus” Pandemic is The Biggest Lie in Human History
Table of Contents:
The Interview the Whole World Should Hear: Dr. Andrew Kaufman, M.D. Blows this Hoax Out of the Water
Testimonials from Nurses and Patients Exposing Empty Hospitals, False Recording of “COVID-19” Deaths, And Other Lies
Are “Viruses” Contagious? Quotations and Revelations About Germ Theory: The Lynchpin Holding the Entire Hoax Together
Vaccine Fraud: Centuries of Testimonials from Doctors and Researchers Proving that Vaccines are Dangerous and Profitable
Videos: Medical Doctors, Whistleblowers, and Researchers Prove Deception and Agenda Beyond Any Shadow of Doubt
More Resources: eBooks, Videos, Articles and Papers Proving Deception
Proof of a Pre-Planned Agenda: Event 201 – A Global Pandemic Exercise… From October 2019?
Connecting the Dots: Other Strong Circumstantial Evidence
Wild viruses have never been proven to cause disease, or be infectious. “The culprit however, is not the microbe. It is the level of toxicity you have in your own blood stream.” -- Good-Bye Germ Theory, Dr. William P. Trebing 2006
Germ Theory is pushed as fact by the nasty big pharma medical mafia that, ever since John Rockefeller used his oil baron money to control schools and institutions, steered legislation and public belief toward holistic medicine being seen as "quackery" because they couldn't patent and profit from it.
Terrain theory says we are expressing bacteria and viruses as solvents and alarm-messenger agents to other cells when our bodies are deficient and or poisoned.
Scurvy was blamed on infection and proven to be a lack of vitamin C. When kids ate asbestos laden wall chips docs and scientists blamed their parents for being stupid, rather than themselves for blanketing the planet with harmful drugs, toxins and chemicals.
The "progress" driven by the big money in the last couple centuries saw a lot of toxins from lead, arsenic, DDT, asbestos and many pesticides be splayed upon the public. When people got injured or sick their corrupt scientists blamed it on an "infectious" agent that is present during the very toxicity caused by their employers.
These people are sick! They cause 500k deaths a yr. in America alone due to "medical errors" and over 100k due to legal drugs.
"The most stunning statistic, however, is that the total number of deaths caused by conventional medicine is an astounding 783,936 per year. It is now evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the US." Dr. Gary Null, Death by Medicine
"Allopathic doctors began amassing power as early as 1759. At that time, legislation was drafted to protect an ‘unsuspecting public’ against quacks or ‘snake oil salesmen.” - Death by Modern Medicine, Dr. Carolyn Dean
The medical system in which modern MDs are trained (with Rockefeller, Carnegie. etc. blood money) makes fundamental assumptions about disease and health based on the profitable THEORIES ingrained into their minds as fact.
Links to articles, books and videos that refute the Germ Theory: Virus Mania Foreword by Dr. Etienne de Harven (2008)
http://whale.to/a/virus_mania1.html
Biochemistry Debunks Corona
Video - 150 U.S. Public Health Service Experiments from 1919 prove that disease is not transmittable
Article – "You cannot Catch Bugs, Pasteur Debunked"
https://www.healingnaturallybybee.com/you-cannot-catch-bugs-germs-bacteria-or-candidafungi/
Book / PDF – "Virus Mania: How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense" – Torsten Engelbrecht
https://groups.io/g/RBTIclub/attachment/6/0/Virus%20Mania%20%20Torsten%20Engelbrecht.pdf
Book – ‘Good-Bye Germ Theory’ is a book refuting the Germ Theory and talking about Vaccine Scam"
https://www.amazon.com/Good-Bye-Germ-Theory-century-medical/dp/1413454402
Article – "Viruses. How Much Is That Dogma In The Window?" https://www.newmedicineonline.com/viruses/
Article - "Doctors refuting the Germ Theory" - By Dr. Bernarr, D.C., D.D :https://realrawfood.com/sites/default/files/article/CONTAGIOUS%20DISEASES%20and%20the%20GERM%20THEORY.pdf
The Germ Theory Deception Part 1 of 4
Article - Dismantling the Virus Theory by Dr. Stefan Lanka, virologist
https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf
Book / PDF – Béchamp or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by Ethel Douglas Hume
http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/history/biographies/Bechamp-or-Pasteur.pdf
Book - What Really Makes You Ill?: Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong, by Dawn Lester and David Parker
https://www.amazon.com/What-Really-Makes-You-Ill/dp/1673104037
The Deception of Virology & Vaccines — Why Coronavirus Is Not Contagious
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/fcjwrg/the_deception_of_virology_vaccines_why/?sort=new
Does the 2019 Coronavirus Exist?
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/does-2019-coronavirus-exist
The Infectious Myth
A Book Project by David Crowe
The Infectious Myth
Most people believe that every disease on the following list has an infectious cause:
HIV/AIDS(audio) Harry Haverkos on Kaposis Sarcoma, Poppers and AIDS
Coronaviruses David Crowe Writings
Critique of COVID-19 ‘science’ (also in Czech, French, German, Spanish, Korean).
Antibody Testing Critique (also in Spanish and Korean).
Isolation versus Purification: Explainer (also in Spanish).
Should you wear a mask? What does the science say? (also in Spanish).
Comparison of 33 FDA-approved RT-PCR COVID-19 tests. Version published on British skeptic website lockdownsceptics.org (Czech).
Rarely Asked Questions (RAQ) on COVID-19 (also in Español, Korean).
Problems with the Current UK Lockdown Policy (Kevin Corbett and David Crowe). Journal of Advanced Nursing blog.
Why I do not think 5G is causing COVID-19 (also in Spanish).
English translation of Chinese false positive article
SARS draft book chapter
SARS timeline
Audio and Video Interviews and Podcasts
(video) Interview by Aditya Sangore, Pune, India.
(video) Facebook interview with Meryl Dorey of the Australian Vaccination Risks Network.
(video) Video based on critical analysis of Coronavirus.
(audio) Remington Nevin MD on Chloroquine and Hydroxchloroquine.
(audio) Simplified discussion of RT-PCR for Coronavirus Testing.
(audio) Interview on RT-PCR with Professor Stephen Bustin (Spanish transcript). Read the following short article to help put the issues in context.
Issues with the RT-PCR Coronavirus Test (also in Spanish and Korean).
(audio) Retired nurse Kevin Corbett on HIV, AIDS and the Coronavirus
(audio) Chemist David Rasnick on the Coronavirus
(audio) David Crowe tackles the Coronavirus Panic
(audio) James Lyons-Weiler on Coronavirus Science
(video) David on Truther Talk Radio.
Writings by Peers
Plandemia en España (Plandemic in Spain). From “STOP Confiniamiento” (Stop the Lockdown) in Spanish (and English).
A Rapidly Changing View of Covid-19 by Matt Irwin, MD, MSW.
Rethinking COVID-19 Mortality Statistics by Chuck Dinerstein MD and Charles Geshekter PhD.
The Nazification of the UK’s National Health Service by Kevin Corbett.
The Peculiar Reality of COVID-19 by John Hardie, BDS, MSc, PhD, FRCDC, “Oral Health”.
Thoughts and Concerns Regarding the New Corona Virus by John Hardie, BDS, MSc, PhD, FRCDC.
Where is the Evidence for the Existence of the Novel Coronavirus? By Kevin Corbett.
West Nile
Mad Cow, CJD and other Spongiform Encephalopathies ( timeline ).
Foot and Mouth
Hepatitis C
Polio ( timeline )
Avian Flu Engelbrecht T, Crowe D. Avian flu virus H5N1: No proof for existence, pathogenicity, or pandemic potential; non-‘H5N1’ causation omitted. Med Hypotheses. 2005 Dec 16.
The 1918 ‘Spanish’ Flu
Ebola Crowe D. “Ebola Ça Suffit!” is not enough to Prove Efficacy of an Ebola Vaccine. American Journal of Immunology. 2017 Jul 4; 13(3): 165-72.
There is considerable scientific evidence that these diseases do not just have non-infectious co-factors, but that they are environmental in nature, not infectious.
In fact, with viruses, it is possible to question their very existence (also in Spanish).
The book “The Infectious Myth” will investigate provide the scientific evidence that the normally accepted infectious cause is not, in fact, valid and, in will identify more plausible environmental causes.
The book will be written by David Crowe.
Stay tuned for updates. The project started in 2006 and is still ongoing.
Check out my radio show and podcast that started in 2014 and is now over 250 episodes.
For more information on David Crowe, including his extensive writing on medical topics, please see DavidCrowe.ca .
Timelines
SARS Timeline
Polio Timeline
Mad Cow Disease Timeline
Contribute
You can contribute to David's work on a book and radio show at patreon.com/InfectiousMyth or liberapay.com/InfectiousMyth or email funds via PayPal to [email protected]
compiled by ~Shannon Gibson