I like Wolfgang's approach from when he did most of his Sandy Hook work. He looks at it from the perspective as if event were real and shows all the ways that simple protocols were not even close to followed; not to mention he's one of the few who's actually taken legal action about these matters. I remember seeing this video of him in a meeting and going off on all the people without saying what he was obviously thinking: that this event was a staged capstone drill. It's hard enough if your conclusion is that a particular event was indeed a hoax (that dirty word that gets channels banned), but expressing that is going to throw you in a world of shit. The smarter thing to do is talk with people about it in such a way as to show all the things that don't add up; don't even mention the possibility of crisis actors, then see where they are at with it. If they can't break beyond that point and at least admit something is very wrong there's no point in bringing up the idea that it was staged (if that happens to be your belief). It's only going to backfire. It's a tough battle because you have to separate what you really feel about these events from what is practical information to present to people. This is why I think the documentary "We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook" is so important with all of this. It doesn't push conclusions, but is packed with all kinds of really strange and contradicting information that is well sourced. I've spoken on the phone several times in the past with Peter Klein (one of its main producers), and his channel got taken out maybe about a year ago and he kind of fell off the radar which is a shame. The "Life of Adam" is kind of like part II to this documentary if anyone hasn't seen them I highly suggest you watch them and they are great to recommend to people who are still "in the matrix" but are at least open to the idea that something is not right with it all. I wish people could put stuff like this together these days about more recent events. Sofia Smallstorm's "Unraveling Sandy Hook" is also very good, but goes more into a deeper conspiracy which some people just might not be ready for.

I haven't looked a lot into the Florida shootings simply because I grow tired of these events and most of my own research is looking at things through the lens of the Occult in relationship to "conspiracy"; I'm not really one to deal with or debate all the logistics outside of the esoteric realm of things. But once you "cry wolf" and one event is shown to be most likely BS (like Sandy Hook), I don't see why I should give the media the time of day about any of the others. Now, I'm not saying I'm an "auto-hoaxer"...far from it. Hey, people could have died, sure. I just don't see any reason to believe that something like Sandy Hook was real based on what we were presented with, so I'm automatically distrusting of something like this, but i get it, you can't just claim something is a hoax because of past events, but it certainly taints things regardless and makes me extremely skeptical. The difference is that I don't make bold claims like "100% hoax" like many people like to jump to. I completely understand why they do, but it's not a very smart way to approach these things in public forums. Nowadays I just simply don't have the time to dive into extensive investigations on these topics, but I'm glad guys like you are doing this Nathan because I can at least check up on them when I feel like it and get an overview with a certain degree of objectivity that most people don't have. I looked extensively into Sandy Hook and the Boston Bombing 4-5 years ago, and beyond that I don't really feel (for my own personal state of awareness) that I need to go more in depth with any of these other "terror" events but I commend the people that do such as yourself (and Wolfgang); putting yourselves into the cross-hairs of people completely devoted to the official narratives requires huge cojones.

That all being said I have to be honest, I was hoping for a bit more from Wolfgang in this talk. I don't feel like there was as much concrete stuff as he'd talked about in the past on Sandy Hook. I know it's a recent event and I'll give him more of a pass on it. I'd also recommend you getting Ole Dammegard into the show if you can, he's been on top of this stuff for years and has even predicted a few event locations.