Bloodlines Of The Serpent Gods Chapter 3.A: Green Phoenix Rising; Building The One World Disorder

Source

Green Phoenix Rising

The phoenix is rising and the worship of Gaia is intended to rise as an environmental big brother, Gaia and the all-seeing-eye projected as a singular entity. The sacrifice of individuality, the burnt offerings we shall offer to the hive mind. The weaponisation of our love, compassion, empathy and indeed our profound connection to nature is very difficult for people to comprehend. It is difficult for people to see through the illusion, for although our current control structure provides the antithesis, it is also the straw man.

Source

The cultivated path of virtue also speaks to our better nature, and so in times of chaos we want to (we increasingly need to) believe those voices of change. I get it, I understand it and I can relate to it, you are not stupid, you are not sheep, you have been manipulated because you care, but (its my belief) that your empathy has been weaponised. This is the hardest part for me, looking around and seeing so many compassionate, intelligent and learned people being misdirected, just imagine what we could achieve if we freed ourselves from the chains of the corporatocracy? Alas like the chameleon it is, the control structure has simply changed colour and that colour is green!

Source

A True Green Future

Again, I want to state that these posts are not intended as a debate on the validity or indeed invalidity of global warming. Whichever side of the fence you sit, this is going to affect us all. By inviting centralised technocracies and bureaucracies to solve our problems we’re making a deal with the devil, from their perspective literally! I have both written and will continue to write about how centralisation of power and indeed energy is in effect destroying the very environment they purport to save. I have taken the time to put my money where my mouth is and point out the fallacies and inconsistencies within corporate and government subsidised green policies and initiatives, and I have much more research (and practical solutions) to share in these subjects.

I will speak about the failure of a food production model that throws away more produce than ever reaches our plates, 2 billion tonnes per year! I will speak about a supermarket industry that would prefer to throw away and incinerate its misshaped, slightly damaged or marginally out of date produce, as opposed to feeding the homeless. Why don’t you offer approaching best before date food at a knockdown price (instead of relative pennies off) when all you will do when it doesn’t sell is throw it away? I will speak about the environmentally destructive business model that the industry (through planned obsolescence) has deliberately created. I will speak to the psychological manipulations that have created the consumer culture.

Encasing our food in plastic is a business model (one that if you really look into it is making us ill) a deliberate decision, so why are the people taught to wear that guilt upon their shoulders whilst its perpetrators are never mentioned? I will speak about EMF’s, I will speak about an innumerable array of inconvenient truths that are conveniently forgotten, well some of us never forget.

Throwaway Culture

I very much believe that with the correct planning and vision we could create a system that rewards individual ingenuity and creativity. I very much believe that we could create a system that retains our freedom and self determinism, but equally enables us to live in a state of balance and mutual symbiosis with the earth. If we were about to remove these intellectual and perceptual leeches and empowered and enabled the populace, I believe we would find that the strongest foundations are built from the grass roots upwards, power to the people! Yet, as I will highlight in part C what we have is fake grassroots movements that (unknowingly to the vast majority of participants) filter control back to the same centralised system that has raped the earth and then attached the guilt upon all our shoulders.

I very much believe that our creativity and ingenuity is being suffocated by an ever tightening noose of red tape and regulation. I very much believe that by breaking free of dogmatic centralised bureaucracy’s (and the sycophants that enable them) the future is something where could find true freedom, individual expression and a clean and healthy environment. I have no love for the consumer culture and our warped definitions of success, how we have been taught to equate happiness through credit card purchases. I have no love for the commoditisation of animals, our increasingly narcissistic throwaway culture, and a vapid mainstream media that enables it all.

Source

I also understand that these are the premeditated states of being that we were born into and taught not to question (until it was expedient to do so). I understand that these changes need to come from within and not (to suit a deeper agenda) be nefariously and insidiously manufactured from without. I’m not a fan of all my aforementioned points, equally I’m not a fan of propaganda, psychological manipulation and perceptual indoctrination, neither am I a fan of a contrived and false veneer of unity. I acknowledge that things very much need to change and I have no fear of change, unfortunately their change will be akin to jumping out of frying pan and into the pit of hades!

A cursory glance at the individuals driving this era of change will reveal that the same mindset that created the system we need to move from, are now creating the system we’re intended to move into. Do you think they will cast aside their wealth and become one with the people? If not, why do you accept one rule for them and another for us? I shall say it again, they have deliberately used the foundations of faux capitalism i.e crapitalism to build the control and power structure that is now forming around us. It was intended as a long term plan that ultimately benefits the few, whilst scapegoating and eventually technologically imprisoning the many.

Rothchild, Rockefeller & The United Nations

Before we continue let’s take a brief (you could write an entire post on this alone) detour to observe the Rockefeller/Rothchild connections to the UN. Indeed, it is my belief that the one world agenda is born of elite bloodlines and is being officially expressed through the United Nations. Much of the UN charter was written by Aiger Hiss and Joseph E Johnson. The charter was also patterned on the communist manifesto and the constitution of Russia, hence the constitution of the USSR was almost identical to that of the UN. Indeed, Hiss would later be convicted of perjury after denying involvement in Soviet espionage, and Johnson would later become secretary of the Bilderberg group. The communist manifesto similarities are interesting when you consider that Karl Marx was a third cousin to the Rothchild family. Equally, the 'Bund der Gerechten' (League of the Just) that was latterly known as the 'Bund der Kommunisten' (League of the Communists), paid Marx to write the Communist Manifesto and was financed by the Rothschilds.

Source

“This world is now, at least for the most part, at the disposal of Marx on the one hand, and of Rothschild on the other. This may seem strange. What can there be in common between socialism and a leading bank? The point is that authoritarian socialism, Marxist communism, demands a strong centralisation of the state. And where there is centralization of the state, there must necessarily be a central bank, and where such a bank exists, speculating with the Labour of the people, will be found. “
—Mikhail BakuninSource

Source

The Rockefeller family are key architects behind the UN precursor the League of nations. This point was referenced in an official UN press release from UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon:

The Rockefeller family has lived up to this conviction, providing immense support for the League of Nations and the United Nations over the years. The original donation to this library was particularly significant. Even today, the interest provides approximately $150,000 every biennium to this wonderful library. That makes it possible to care for its many priceless historical treasures, including a signed copy of the Treaty of Versailles and the Covenant of the League of Nations.Source

As evidenced in this academic paper, the Rockefeller foundation were also instrumental in the transition from the league of nations to the United Nations. As highlighted in part 3, the purchase of the land to build the UN headquarters was instructed by Nelson Rockefeller and financed by his father John D. Rockefeller Jr. In light of this information, perhaps it shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise that Nelson Rockefeller was a member of the U.S delegation at the United Nations founding conference. To this day the Rockefeller foundation provides an innumerable array of donations and have several partnerships with the United Nations. They also fund the UN foundation, but this link literally went dead as I was writing this post.

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure--one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

David Rockefeller autobiography titled memoirs found on page 405

Interesting how he uses the term "extremist" to collectivise anyone that opposes his ideology, where have we heard that before?

Rio Earth Summit 1992

From a public perspective, we can see the wheels of the modern green/global warming movement begin to gain traction at the 1992 Rio earth summit. It was at this meeting where many of our current green policies began to form. Of course, the earth summit was simply a consolidation of concepts/agreements that had been slowly bubbling to the surface. Certainly, further consolidation (and the first use of the term "sustainable development") can be found within the pages of the Bruntland report which you can find here. The Bruntland report was named so in recognition of its author, the former Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harlem Bruntland who was also the chair of the UN world commission of environment and development (WCED). The report was commissioned by the UN affiliated Club Of Rome (of which Bruntland was a member), other members include:

• Tony Blair
• Al Gore
• Maurice Strong
• Mikhail Gorbachev
• Anne Ehrlich (wife of Paul Ehrlich)
• David Rockefeller
• Kofi Annan
• Robert Muller
• Ted Turner
• George Soros
• Bill Clinton
• Bill Gates
• Stephen Schneider
• Henry Kissinger
• Queen Beatrix

Running parallel to the reports environmental concerns were discussions relating to a restructured international economic system (my thoughts on the impending new financial order can be found here) and the need for multilateralism. The UN action plan that arose from the summit and subsequent report were initially both unpopular and unbinding (UN migrant pact anyone?), but through the Kyoto principles the plan has now become enshrined into law. Equally, the Rio earth summit galvanised the aforementioned Maurice Strong into becoming the key architect of the now infamous UN agenda 21 sustainable development plan. I would just like to add that yes it is very true that agenda 21 (connected to agenda 2030 & UN habitat human settlements programme) is not a legally binding document; then again it doesn’t have to be binding to be implemented through the NGO driven manufacturing of consent I shall discuss over the next couple of posts. The below quote is taken from the book that arose from the report, and it can be purchased here.

“Agenda 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on Earth…. It calls for specific changes in the activities of all people….“Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced – a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level”.

Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet (Earthpress, 1993)

Although often confused with the philosophically aligned Agenda 21, the below map is actually from 1991 and is of the envisioned Wildlands Project brought forth by the UN Convention on Biological Diversity Plan to Restore Biodiversity in the United States.

Again, due to its nature as an all encompassing agenda here we can see the Catholic Church embracing agenda 2030 and the united nations inspired sustainable development goals. The agenda seeks total control of the human domain and rights of travel and self determinism. The gradual removal of people from the countryside and into smart city high density housing. The end of private ownership and (I believe) the insidious erosion of the family unit.

If we hope to save the planet we must accept that we are one people and unite to create "a space for dialogue and meeting for all countries in a spirit of mutual respect," and must stop what "hinders the attainment of the sustainable development goals approved unanimously by the United Nations." Pope Francis

And below in a recent statement we find Pope Francis expressing his desire for a global order.

Our only hope for planetary peace and progress is to make room for “international organizations” to develop into governing bodies, supplanting the “state interests” with the will of the United Nations. Pope Francis

Source

George Hunt

The video below was recorded at the summit by an individual named George Hunt and further papers/private emails/research can be found here. Excert Below:

In 1987 Hunt (due to running an environmental business) was invited to attend the Colorado wilderness conference. It was at the conference that Hunt become aware of the deeper more insidious narrative that sat behind the green agenda and the environmental fraud that was/is intended to be perpetrated against an unsuspecting public. Within the video below you will hear the self appointed elites including the aforementioned Maurice Strong, Edmund De Rothchild (in their own words) discuss the direction of humanity. Of key interest is the statement made by David Lang:

“DAVID LANG: I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process. That would take too long and devour far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder, unfortunately, that populates the earth. We have to take almost an elitist program, [so] that we can see beyond our swollen bellies, and look to the future in time frames and in results which are not easily understood, or which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down to some kind of simplistic definition”.

If you listen to the recording you will hear Rothchild discuss a “global Marshall plan” which is interesting in light of Al Gore’s later comments. The below comment was originally held here but surprise surprise it has since been removed, although the title still remains:

“The model of the Marshall Plan can be of great help. For example, a Global Marshall Plan must focus on strategic goals and emphasize actions and programs that are likely to remove the bottlenecks presently inhibiting the healthy functioning of the global economy. The new global economy must be an inclusive system that does not leave entire regions behind. The new plan will require the wealthy nations to allocate money for transferring environmentally helpful technologies to the Third World and to help impoverished nations achieve a stable population and a new pattern of sustainable economic progress. To work, however, any such effort will also require wealthy nations to make a transition themselves that will be in some ways more wrenching than that of the Third World.”

Johannesberg Earth Summit

The video that I have included below the next couple of paragraphs was recorded by Russian Major General Konstantine Petrov, whose life/and potentially suspicious death details can be found here. In the video (alongside some observations on ancient Kemet that directly connect us to part one) Petrov states that by the 2002 Johannesberg summit, the plan had stalled. The words below are lifted directly from the video in which Petrov states that they were printed in the (non-public) elite journal “Expert” number 37 2nd Sept 2002. The heads of international and multinational corporations attending the meeting made an ultimatum in which they stated:

”We shall solve all problems of rich and poor, if you submit to us in undivided possession all of the infrastructure that ensures the livelihood of people. First of all this is the world energy resources, all water and raw materials – minerals, and the remaining infrastructure for people’s livelihoods.”

Now if you’d heard that statement in 2002, the insidious/grandiose nature of its premise would have perhaps been difficult to comprehend/believe. Equally, in this era of increased privatisation and technocratic colonialism, we can see its seeds of intent begin to bear fruit. Indeed, if you take a step back and look at it objectively you can see it playing out around us. Whilst I don’t have access to Petrov’s aforementioned publication, I do have eyes and my eyes can see that much of this is being enabled through the UN’s (diplomatically immune) world bank. As observed on their website, the world bank has a keen interest in resource privatisation. Through their stepping up campaign we can find the world bank using climate change to further the narrative of privatisation.

Since 2016, the Africa Climate Business Plan (ACBP) has delivered $17 billion to meet the investment needs for climate adaptation and resilience on the continent and is maximizing finance for development to catalyze more private sector investments. Source

Source

Philanthropic Colonialism

So let’s take a basic look at how they take over the infrastructure of (so called) third world and developing countries. Foreign aid and monetary loans usually benefits the interconnected politically infiltrated corporatocracy of the supplier, to a far greater degree that the recipient. Aid usually comes in the form of infrastructure projects, medicine and vaccine schedules which of course are handed over to our favourite, friendly neighbourhood multinationals. Even aside from aid/loans we have multinationals such as Nestle draining the great lakes for a dollar a day, the same company that throughout the California drought/wildfires (and despite Californians being ordered to restrict water use) continued to draw and bottle 36 million gallons of water from the Californian national forest. But that’s a subject for another day!

In developing countries, many seemingly philanthropic infrastructure projects and certainly the vast majority of loans often come with similar privatisation proviso’s including mineral and water rights, corporate colonialism masquerading as altruism/philanthropy. So let’s use water as an example. In 1997 the UN world-bank loaned twenty million dollars to the Bolivian government. Two concessions included the privatisation and commercialisation of Bolivian water resources. In the Bolivain city of Cochabamba the privatisation process was handed to a subsidiary of the US Bechtel multinational. In the city of La Paz El Alto it was handed to a subsidiary of the French multinational Suez, notice how (much like their insidious takeover of food brands) these multinational behemoths hide behind a labyrinth of names and in essence offer the illusion of choice.

After the infrastructure had been installed these organisations began to raise their rates, sometimes by as much as 200%. The poor could not afford to pay for their own water and so attempted to return to their old methods of water collection, the newly privatised industry fought back and commenced an attempt to license or outright ban people from collecting water from their roofs and charge them for the use of their wells. The populace became justifiably angry and the anger spilled out onto the streets as an uprising, this era would come to be known as the Bolivian water wars. Although people power eventually managed to defeat these draconian water measures, even away from developing countries (whilst companies like Nestle drain the lakes) there are several (although for different reasons) water collection restrictions in many states of the U.S.

Moved Too Quickly?

In this instance the companies were too hasty and overplayed their hands, but similar stealthier measures are now occurring across the globe. Within western societies such infrastructure projects are reported as success stories, connecting deprived and disconnected communities to sanitation. Unfortunately with big business involvement there is always a pay off, which once filtered through the black and white machinations of our mainstream media are seldom reported. This isn’t philanthropy its (with a nod to general Petrov) the privatisation and corporatisation of the worlds resources. Through a maze of Malthusian manipulation (if you do your homework) it can all be connected to the same globalist control network, an agenda that (under the guise of resource management) is more welcomed than questioned.

Manufacturing Consent

In relation to the esoteric nature of the first part of this chapter, within esoteric law we must (through our albeit manipulated freewill) consent to the seismic changes that are intended to take place. Through an innumerable profusion of exponentially evolving NGO’s, COG.s and thank tanks, we see the unveiling of the new (although very old) unstructured control model. A system intent on superseding the decaying vestiges of an albeit pseudo democracy. A form of governance that (to varying degrees) is both officially and or philosophically entangled within the one world narrative, but that equally transcends a singular entity of control. At the ground level this is manifested in the mantra’s of sustainable development and regeneration, but these are the merely the palatable foundations of a totalitarian system of governance that is intended to rise through the evolution of environmental and associated social control mechanisms.

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.” Mikhail Gorbachev 1996

Of course, the mantras of sustainable development and regeneration sound like a great idea! Who doesn’t think development shouldn’t be sustainable (I know I do), or that the environment doesn’t need protecting (it really does!). It’s not until you dig deeper that you realise that this movement is in essence a greenwashed corporate takeover of environmentalism, equating environmentalism with vast corporate (part publicly funded) green energy projects. Indeed, as I have written about here, the increased centralisation of power/energy (yes that includes green energy) is actually destroying the very environment they purport to save. A true green energy revolution will only come through enabling individuals to pursue a course of decentralisation, in a literal sense “power to the people!” Alas, what we have is a predetermined narrative masquerading as freedom of choice, the illusion of choice is being used to manufacture the consent of the populace.

In the below report the author (Simon Linnett/Executive Vice Chairman of N M Rothschild) envisions greenhouse emissions as a form of "social market"

"That such a market has to be established on a world basis coordinated by an international institution with a constitution to match. That, perhaps, it might be regarded as having wider benefits than merely `saving the planet' - perhaps it might be the basis of a new world order, one that is not based on trade and/or conflict resolution.
Perhaps one can see a way to achieve this goal through leadership, vision and some marginal and manageable renunciation of national sovereignty, how the world might just get there.
The repercussions of addressing climate change may extend well beyond that single but critical issue....
Implicit in all the above is that nations have to be prepared to subordinate, to a certain extent, some element of their sovereignty to this world initiative."Source

The Narrative Controllers

Casting my mind back to the dark occult, many of us associate such practices with visceral images of Satanism and sacrifice. Unfortunately, it’s most prevalent and insidious aspect is also one that is (dare I say deliberately) overlooked and that is the manipulation of free will and yes the manufacturing of consent. From this perspective, dark occultic doctrines are more prevalent now than at any other time in human history; they are found in advertising campaigns and the propaganda that is littered throughout our media platforms and it is deeply entrenched within this agenda. The agenda seeks to manufacture consent for the seismic societal changes that are intended to be implemented against an unsuspecting public, they use fear, the spectre of emergency, division and propaganda to achieve it.

Source

Within planning and sustainable development there are numerous ways to control the narrative whilst hiding behind the veneer of choice, the Delphi technique is a popular one. Incidentally the Delphi technique is born out of the Rand corporation and many UN affiliated NGO’s appear to be using it to their advantage. In essence, it hides a premeditated/predetermined agenda behind an illusion of choice, limiting options and the ability to voice a collective opinion that defies the narrative. Let’s take a look at it in action:

Identity Politics

Now I’ve spoken at great length about online identity politics so I won’t cover old ground, but I will relay my belief that at the ground level this control is turning society into a giant re-education camp. I liken it the changes/redefinitions that are occurring within our society as akin to an induction into the military. When you join say the marines they attempt to break you down in order that they can rebuild you in their required image. In a wider context we can see this concept playing out within the social structure of society and identity politics is a key driver behind this change.

Throughout the media, via NGO’s and social change operatives they elevate, fund, attach virtue and propagate the mantras of minority groups/movements/philosophies that (and this can be very loosely) hold some form of commonality with the globalist agenda. Equally they disenfranchise movements, ideologies and community initiatives that don’t align to these ideals. As they empower tenuosly aligned minority groups and collectives and attach negative connotaions to the majority culture, this in turn creates confusion and agitation within the wider sphere of society. These associated states can boil over into (oft online) confrontation and inflamatory language. This is an intended outcome, for discourse can be seized upon and used to collectivise and create legislation that will gradually infringe upon our ability to offer an opinion that counters the agenda.

Source

The Entrainment Cycle

If you take a look at this article (which discusses removing cars from the road), you will see an example of what I term an entrainment cycle. They introduce an idea, first of all and in terms of the moment in which it’s relayed it will seem fairly extreme and will appear in couple of papers perhaps a talk show and then they step back and gauge opinion.

They then wait for a while and bring in the second cycle and this time it will have a wider reach, more papers, more shows and then again they step back. They repeat this process as many times as is necessary and each time the cycle becomes tighter and receives more coverage. Eventually the cycle becomes so tight and widespread it reaches a singularity of thought, and the subconscious of the populace has become so entrained to this new idea/direction, that they both accept it and incorporate it into their perceptual reality.

Southern California Association Of Governments

So let’s use Southern CA Assn. of Governments (SCAG) as an example. Now SCAG is an unelected and unconstitutional regional government, in fact covering 6 counties (and counting) and 191 cities, they are the largest regional government in the States. SCAG is following a mandate whose intent is to gradually and insidiously curtail our right of free movement i.e in our own cars, evolving from this narrative will be the increased need for people to move from the countryside and into high impact housing within the intended smart mega cities. Once cocooned within the smart city (and I’m sure under the guise of monitoring our carbon footprint) our every action, interaction and (through the internet of things) consumption can be tracked monitored and surveilled. This is why despite numerous concerns relating to the environmental impact of the 5G rollout and associated electromagnetic radiation, the environmental NGO’s I shall discuss in part c remain silent, they welcome the control grid!

Source

Indeed the UN’s own figures clearly display their belief that by 2050 2/3 of the world’s population will be living in cities. Equally, it’s not too much of a stretch to say that by this time all cities will be smart, but let’s get back to SCAG. The head of SCAG was Hasan Ikhrata, who was a former planner within the Soviet Union, although he has now moved to the affiliated San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). The first few phases of the agenda will seem reasonable and will ride in on a wave of sustainable development and regeneration. Alongside redevelopment (which will slowly gentrify the city center and gradually move everyone into high density housing on the periphery) the intro to the traffic management plan will include speed restrictions, speed bumps and then certain roads will begin to be closed (just a few at first).

We now start to hear an avalanche of information regarding air pollution, as they always go for the emotional angle the first burden will be put upon parents dropping their children off at school. Now we begin to hear about the concept of being charged for every mile we drive, first this will occur in the city environment but once the public have been trained to accept the concept it will be increasingly expanded. Eventually, this and similar initiatives will begin to price people off the roads, if they can’t afford to drive of course they will be pushed towards the city where the only affordable housing will increasingly be high density. Eventually, all non business/work related travel will become a preserve of the rich, for remember they are creating a technocratic feudal society.

Source

Negative Stereotypes

The next stage is where they begin to collectivise people are create negative stereotypes around said collectives, gas guzzlers, parents too lazy to walk their children to school etc etc. They collectivise and generalise against anyone within targeted demographic, whilst remaining wilfully ignorant to individual reasoning/perspective. They then begin to elevate say (as an example) cycling groups, raise them as voices of authority and attach positive virtues to them. Now before we continue, cycling groups are a good way to elucidate the points I was making with the spiritual connections I made in part one. Now, that doesn't mean that cyclists are in a plot to draw us into a one world system of governance just that they have a commonality with an aspect of it, hence they're expedient to the cause. You see this form of governance doesn't require vast numbers of people in the know to accumulate power, just loosely affiliated collectives that create a powerful single narrative. Tenuous links in a growing chain of control.

Source

But let’s get back to my point, they then begin to draw (remember this process is repeated throughout the power structure) perhaps even tenuously aligned community groups into an increasingly powerful singular narrative. They use this powerful voice to create community hubs that supersede true grass roots community initiatives, whilst at the same time creating the outward impression that this is a community initiative and failing to mention the marginalisation of those that don’t conform. In respect of the aforementioned observations, I was recently sent this petition and its wording (which I’ve included below) interested me for it speaks to the same subversive template that is being utilised as a subversion technique within many areas of planning/regulation.

Enable the market to be run by a local non profit community interest company.
A CIC already exists and was successfully running the market until Kingswood property developers unscrupulously replaced them with a private company in attempt to divide resistance. Private companies are driven by profits for share holders whereas a CIC is, as the name suggests, for the benefit of the entire community.Source

Social Change

I’m just using the slow insidious removal of cars as an example, but you can use this narrative control template within the aforementioned regeneration, sustainable development, planning regulation and environmental policy measures. They eventually want you tied up in so much red tape that it will become a noose for the common man. Again, at the outset and during the opening stages (for anyone that hasn’t done their homework) this is all going to seem very reasonable, but the more power and support they’re able to garner the more draconian it is going to become.

Source

All the while they will assume the moral high ground for at its most simplistic this is a game of psychology, legislated social change can be only be elicited from lofty perches and the manufacturing of consent. Each stage of the process will require the relinquishment of more freedom, but as this is an all encompassing media fuelled agenda before each phase large swathes of the public will have been psychologically manipulated to accept the erosion of freedom as a sign of virtue. If you think my afore statements are overstated then I will draw your attention to the incoming part c, where I show how these concepts have young people (unknowingly) literally requesting enslavement and the control over every facet of their lives! Seemingly so entranced (or frozen in fear) that they’re unaware of the vipers nest they’re walking into. Those that attempt to swim against the tide (or simply question the narrative) will eventually have the full force of vilification bearing down upon them.

Source

Before We Continue

Before we continue, I will add that I’m certainly no fan of air pollutants, although I’d surmise that with advances in engines/filters the inner city air quality of now is better than that of my childhood. Moving forward, aren’t electric cars supposed to have zero emissions? And isn’t there a mandate to remove diesel/petrol cars from the road? Plus we have my aforementioned hemp car solution, which actually create less CO2 than an electric car. We also have new technology that can draw smog, purify the air and even create jewellery from the pollutants!

Source

Changes within the workplace (and tax incentives for doing so) could also enable far more people to work from home. I’m also not saying that when living in a city environment (although a car may be needed for certain journeys or further distances) the vast majority of journeys couldn’t be made by public transport. Unfortunately, public transport is also often privatised and the associated costs are increasingly prohibitive. Equally, with inner cities becoming a hotbed for crime, I can understand hesitation within certain demographics around using buses/trains etc.

Outside of the concrete jungle, we can certainly consider that the gradual erosion of travel rights will slowly but surely nudge people out of the countryside and into the desired high density housing on the periphery of the smart city. The inner city will become the preserve of the rich and the workers that serve the system; by observing the regeneration (gentrification) process, we can begin to see this momentum gathering pace.

Source

ICLEI

ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability is a global network of more than 1,750 local and regional governments committed to sustainable urban development. Active in 100+ countries, we influence sustainability policy and drive local action for low emission, nature-based, equitable, resilient and circular development.Source

When you begin to hear the buzzwords of regeneration and sustainable development, it could be worth checking if your local council is aligned to an NGO named ICLEI. Its network includes 1750 cities/towns/regions and 124 countries, 25% of the global urban population and 20% of the global population. The image below lists the ICLEI network (in blue) throughout Europe and the UK.

Source

In early publications they seek to distance themselves from the both the UN and the UN implemented agenda 21, stating:

ICLEI does not seek to impose or mandate upon local governments any policies or initiatives, such as United Nations Agenda 21 - nor does ICLEI have any authority to do so.Source

Although as evidenced through the UN’s website, they subsequently appear to be partnering with them. A cursory glance at the interconnected nature of their sponsorship and partnership allegiances reveal ICLEI to be akin to another arm of this unstructured control network and growing one world agenda. In essence, ICLEI are there to (unofficially) enable and drive forward the localised roll out of the UN's agenda 2030.

Source

Robert Muller

Another individual that connects many strands (most notably within education) is Robert Muller. Indeed Muller is often referred to as the “father of global education” and in 1989 he received the UNESCO (the education arm of the UN) Peace and Education Prize for his World (common) Core Curriculum, a global education program. It’s interesting to note that Robert Muller was the co-founder of UNESCO and certainly two of his books lay bare his one world philosophy 1: Shaping a global spirituality and 2: The birth of a global civilisation.

We must move as quickly as possible to a one government; a one world religion; under a one world leader. Robert Muller 1991 First lady of the world

So in one individual (known as the prophet of the UN) we have the expression of a one world government a one world religion and a one world education system. It’s also prudent to note that Muller spent 53 years working with the United Nations where he was (among other titles), former assistant general, secretary of the (Lucis Trust connected) UN economic and social council, director of budget overseeing all UN programmes, key architect of UN environmental policy and the UNESCO world (common) core education programme.

There are currently 29 Robert Muller schools across the world with more being established each year. The underlying philosophy of Muller schools are the teachings of the Lucis Trust born Arcane school and spiritual philosophy that was channelled by Lucis Trust founder Alice Bailey. Indeed, the Robert Muller School World Core Curriculum Manual was published by the Lucis Publishing Company in 1986. The world core curriculum is working towards the creation of “global citizens” for a forthcoming one world government and the aforementioned one world religion that will be led by a one world spiritual leader. In their 51-page document entitled “A Methodological Guide to the Application of the Notion of Common Core in the Training of Various Categories of Educational Personnel” we find UNESCO (all the way back in 1984) coining the term "common core".

I dream that Unesco will study and recommend by the year 2000 a world core curriculum for adoption by all nations. Robert Muller Source

I'd just like to add, over the years I've become adept at reading between the lines of the flowery language that hides the deeper meaning/agenda of the globalist. From that perspective I would say (and I could be wrong) I find Muller to be more akin to a manipulated idealist than wholly aligned with the dark side of the globalist agenda.

Education

"Education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished." Book: "The Impact of Science on Society", published in 1951, (Page 50 - The Intended Result of Education) By Bertrand Russell. More referenced Russell quotes here

From an official perspective, the mantras of our impending doom/the climate emergency are being increasingly filtered down to the school classroom/playground and the minds of children. We (officially) appear to be placing the burden of responsibility atop the shoulders of children. The combination of this rhetoric and the 12 year apocalyptic message is (I believe) creating fear, anxiety and exasperating mental health issues. Equally, if you can capture the minds of the youth then you have a future unquestioning and captive audience.

Source

Certainly, with the infiltration of the Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations and (with a nod to Robert Muller) the move towards a world core education curriculum, the UN world youth assembly and latterly through Google’s infiltration of the classroom, to Bill Gates pushing common core and now as shown below partnering with UNESCO. To an ever expanding array of Microsoft education partnerships. It’s clear to see that the classroom has been infiltrated by corporate interests that are aligned with the globalist (one world) agenda.

That is not to say that your child’s teacher or school has any agenda other than to teach, and they may be doing that to a very high standard. What I do believe is that within certain areas of globalist fuelled indoctrination, the youth will be increasingly taught not to question the predetermined narrative. That this concept will be used to book end perception and from there insidiously erode the art of critical thinking. The youth will be increasingly taught to follow the religion of climate science, without questioning scientific dogmas or understanding the methodology behind scientific statistical analysis. Infiltrating the minds of children in order that (on the march to their demanded enslavement) they become the future greenshirts of the globalist agenda.

Not much remains to be said in conclusion, but what remains is important. It is that the task before Unesco is necessary, is oppor- tune, and, in spite of all multiplicity of detail, is single. That task is to help the emergence of a single world culture, with its own philosophy and background of ideas, and with its own broad purpose. Page 62 Unesco its purpose and its philosophy by Julian Huxley. The full report can be read HERE

Once you have certain unquestioning global commonalities within the education system, you can begin to work towards some form of globalised common core. You can begin to cultivate a feudal education system that will in turn fuel the feudal technocracy that is being assembled around us. You see, as with the intended financial reset this coming seismic social change has zero to do with lifting the third world up to a decent standard of living, alas it is about lowering us all down into the fourth world. The fourth world will be a feudal technocracy and one that is born through guilt, fear and the psychological indoctrination of youth.

Children and (to a lesser extent) adults are being nefariously prepared for this coming depraved new world. They’re being nudged towards two predetermined false choices, surrender to the machinations of the globalists or watch the world burn in a fire of eternal damnation. Becoming trapped between polarised perspectives is the essence of a new social structure that will offer the illusion of choice to arrive at a predetermined destination.

Source

Of course, a feudal society needs its ground level controllers (there to stop us from stepping out of line) and so the children of aligned higher social castes will be taught to understand some of the nuances between these polarities. Equally, outside of the inner core they will still be encapsulated within a slightly broader control model and will receive rewards for their allegiance. The children of the fourth world will be taught simplistic black and white answers to complex social issues. They will be trained to become emotionally attached to and animated by set talking points. They will be trained neither question nor step outside the confines of the perceptual and intellectual thought prison that is being assembled around them. Like the priestclass of the past, the high priestesses of Gaia are intended to be blindly followed, their methods neither questioned nor fully comprehended. The rebellion of youth has been weaponsed, join me next time to see where it intended to take us.

To Be Continued In Part 3.B, which can be found here

If you appreciate my voice and perspective and would like to enable to to research and write more, I would really appreciate the support/upvote and/or resteem. Any donations can be given to the litecoin address below.

Litecoin: LdzNy4ZdvTXLCV4ZwbGMx56CmGypar9BXW

Thank you for taking the time to read my post part C will be coming soon, until then I will leave you to decide who has the perceptualflaws.

Written by perceptualflaws
Gifs courtesy of giphy.com
Banner Gifs courtesy of @justcallmemyth