Two interesting things about climate change:
- The head of the UN on climate change, Christiana Figueres, believes population control is the solution for climate change.
- The biggest cause of greenhouse gasses is meat production. The largest food source for animals raised for meat is GMOs.
The Climate Change/Population Control Connection
It's kind of scary to think that the people running the world propose reducing the population as a measure for combating climate change. They argue that since people pollute the planet, if there were less of us we would cause less pollution. These people really want to exterminate the planet and they openly talk about it, yet few people know it. We're not talking about a small reduction in the population either. Figueres wants to reduce the population by billions in the future. As if that's not astonishing enough, keep in mind the population is projected to grow by billions of people.
A dead giveaway that the climate change agenda is a scam is the people promoting it. For example, John Holdren has been very open about his views of overpopulation since the 70s. He's definitely worth looking up (in the link above) so you can see what kind of sick people run this world behind the scenes. Holdren has advocated for inhumane measures to take place, quickly, before we're ruined by our greatest threat - overpopulation. He was clearly wrong because he said that if we were to reach a population of 280 million, it would be far too much. Here we are over 300 million and we're doing just fine, in spite of people like him being in charge. More recently, climate change has become one of Holdren's key issues. When people like Holdren, Obama, and Hillary Clinton are promoting climate change solutions, you can rest assured it's a scam!
GMOs Are The Primary Cause of Greenhouse Gasses
GMO crops are subsidized by the government, which makes it cheaper to eat poor quality meat than it is to eat organic blueberries. Not only is GMOs a large contributor to green house gasses, but also a major cause of diseases and morbidity, while exacerbating our future water crisis. It takes more water to produce meat than vegetables, and GMO crops require even more water because they're inefficient at water uptake through their roots. GMOs destroy the natural ebb and flow of agriculture because GMO farmers operate at a loss and get their profit from subsidies. How can organic farmers and small farmers compete with large agricultural companies when the government is subsidizing the large agricultural giants? To make things worse, the GMOs are largely used to feed livestock and in the creation of processed foods. If we took the crops produced for animal consumption and consumed them ourselves, we could end world hunger and greatly reduce the deforestation of the rain forests.
Plus GMO food production causes far more chemicals to be dumped into our environment because of course Monsanto is dumping their Roundup on their crops. This would have all continued and got worse had Hillary became president. Trump is different. The odds are he's a lot better than she would have been. And I think he's off to a pretty good start. The economists I follow don't agree with his economic policies and
Ron Paul doesn't back him, so he's not perfect.
Trump Backed Out of the Paris Agreement
Trump's recent decision to back us out of the Paris agreement was a great decision. The agreement allowed China and India, both big polluters with high populations, to continue polluting as they wish for years to come. Meanwhile, its objective was to reduce the supposed global warming by a fraction of a degree by year 2100. Here's the kicker: it would have costed a total of $100 trillion! Everyone involved in making that agreement and those profiting from it would likely be dead and gone by the time we reached the year 2100 and saw it was miserable failure. They'd all be laughing in their graves over the grand scam that they pulled off.
Climate Change Hypocrisy
The same people promoting the climate change agenda are the same ones who have been allowing the polluting of our planet to happen. The same leaders subsidizing GMOs are supposedly concerned about climate change. If they were really concerned about the environment, they'd do something about it! They don't need to implement a global carbon tax to save the world. How about we don't allow companies to spray pesticides all over our food? Why don't we stop subsidizing meat since it causes a lot of greenhouse gasses and requires a lot of water?
Why Lie About Climate Change?
They have another reason to convince us of climate change, besides money. They're pushing agenda 21. Agenda 21 is well worth looking up if you don't know what it is. We need to know the tricks and moves they're trying to pull on us so we don't fall for them. They're basically planning to control the whole planet, even more so than they already do.
Great Videos About Climate Change
WOW!!! Just WOW!!! Thanks for sharing!!!
Great post and SO TRUE!
This post recieved an upvote from minnowpond. If you would like to recieve upvotes from minnowpond on all your posts, simply FOLLOW @minnowpond
nice work, the UN admits its false
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-03/un-official-admits-global-warming-agenda-really-about-destroying-capitalism
re Steemed!
and I hate the UN