i have watched and listened to james for years and i wont stop, but over time something is bugging me. as a sys admin / hacker etc james understanding of tech is NOT good and he often makes mistakes, james is also not a climate scientist so i guess what im really asking for is instead of this offhand dismissal thing which james has got into, can we maybe try and present the facts with a little less bias ? the whole reason i started watching was the logical and factual reporting but nowadays its getting a bit more.... biased. ok maybe james is playing to his audience and they are the ones paying i suppose, but i think long term its not a good strategy. i was watching the vid 'smart tech and the end of privacy' last night and there wasnt just things i didnt agree with there were massive glaring technical errors reproduced with rolling eyes as though its the norm by two people who - lets face it - dont know anything at all about computers. dont get me wrong i detest alexa and all that crap, but you should really get your facts straight if you are going to talk about it. i could go through that podcast and rip both of you to pieces over that. in future if you need technical advice on a particular issue, ask me or someone who knows before you start spouting it on the internet. the way you described phone surveillance and alexa 'accidentally' mailing some dudes friend was absolutely facepalm. you got the tech details completely wrong and furthermore you left out significant information so what you were saying sounded way worse than what it actually was. i am sure your usual sycophants wont pull you up on this, so youre lucky you have me :) no offence n that, love your reporting james but lets not get carried away with stuff eh ? :)
I just think, whether he's 100% right on the facts or not, 2 things remain:
1- People should do their own research and question everything regardless if it's Corbett or any other source.
2- Technology is being implemented only as a system of control and that system is being used (in the shadows) by the Elite/Deep State/Statists (whatever you want to call them) to produce scarcity/poverty/violence/terrorism/add buzzword here
n01 -
For someone using rhetoric such as "you obviously know nothing at all" it's not surprising that you apparently were never told this bit of common sense:
"Believe nothing you hear and only half of what you see."
But then it's irrational to seek the conversion of others and I'm no altruist so I'm entirely content to respect your right to subject yourself to leaps of faith. However it's my charitable nature to say to you that it's reasonable to expect that no self respecting anarchist will lift a finger to impede the cannibalism of socialist versus socialist. By all means stay with your chosen collective egos I don't care. I'm going the other way thanks. By the way, where did all the buffalo go?
Woodchuck Pirate
aka Raymond J Raupers Jr USA
woodchuckpirate.com
hi mr chuckup private
youre obviously a moron, one of those either so dumb they cant grasp how written words go together to form conceptual thought or one wilfully trying to twist what i said for your own benefit. being as you seem to believe this page is your blog i guess you feel the need to reply to every single post. in this case i suggest you fuckoff because you simply dont have to brain to engage with me. i also detest american conspiracy losers such as yourself.
when i used the phrase you know nothing at all to that shithead, i meant in reference to myself, not actually zero. he probably knows how to ask his mum to wipe his nose granted. other than that tho, he is just another member of a huge group of morons of which you are also a member. please fucking die all of you and do us a favour.
LOL, Richard Nikoley much?
Have a nice evening!
Woodchuck Pirate
aka Raymond J Raupers Jr USA
woodchuckpirate.com
sad yank conspiracy twat much ?
please fucking die ;)
You are way too aggressive, a little rude, a little coarse and I don't really feel like replying to you except to say (in the rude like manner you present yourself): Blindly believing in people makes you a sheep. Thinking the fact someone is a "journalist" means that person is full-proof makes you a sheep. Not cross-checking EVERYTHING makes you a sheep. Finally, reading Metabunk??? Good luck.
blindly believing in people does indeed make you a sheep. i said grow a brain before you come back and you obviously havent complied. yes, try reading metabunk. you might have to go fact check some of it. lol.
actually one more thought - you twats that say you have to fact check everything - ill be willing to bet my penis that you wouldnt fact check metabunk because that is how your cognitive bias works. if you were able to do that you wouldnt believe some of the ridiculous pillars of the 9/11 bollocks. my guess is the bias works by dismissing certain sources of facts as unsound. in your case it probably will be by selecting batshit mental sources of information over sensible ones. have a nice day cuntface.