You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Distribution and Curation: Ending the Infinite Circle Jerk in the Trending Section and Lifting the 99.99%
What gives me a little hope are the fundraising/charity blogs.
There are lots of good people here who can see past selfish earnings.
I think they would agree to make reasonable compromises to expedite the grand vision of Steemit.
Maybe the power down period is too short? Or maybe the reward vs lockup period should have tiers?
I think that discourages investment, which is bad for the platform. That's just one thought and worth a post from you about to explore further how you think it'd work.
I am connecting high quality content, and the curation of that content, to the long-term prosperity of the platform, which can most reasonably be expected from users who have long-term stakes.
What I'd like to see is tiered/adjustable power down periods that correspond to levels of inflation. Both short and longterm investors could be served.
And the ratio for those tiers could be guided by network growth, coin price, and other health metrics. Ex. If things are going great, power downs periods could shorten.
Just some thoughts...
Interesting thought of opening up ease of sale when things are going well. I think I like that. I think that's tied to price and not to inflation because I'm pretty sure inflation is a set number hard wired into the hardfork.