You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Why bother with circle jerks?
I dont know why you are arguing against something that i never said nor implied.
I'm not arguing with you at all. I am stating my problems/concerns with UBI.
I dont know why you are arguing against something that i never said nor implied.
I'm not arguing with you at all. I am stating my problems/concerns with UBI.
Sry, but you mentioned that a couple of times and I was honestly getting a little annoyed by it. No offense, I love you mate ;)
Because you said we disagreed on UBI. I was telling you what it would take to get me to agree that UBI could work.
I meant the free money part.... Or do you need free money to agree on UBI?! xD
No for me to agree UBI could work I need to know the answer to these three things in a rational way, not simply because it is compassionate or sounds good. The answer does not have to come from you. SO I am not telling you that this is your duty to convince me. Without these things I see it as yet another program that is essentially continually kicking the can down the road.
Those currently are my three sticking points with the concept of UBI.
I can see your concerns. Well I wanted to post about the topic anyways. Maybe I can get you with some emotional statement ;). I cant even say for sure that BUI will work, but it is a much simpler experiment than Anarcho-Capitalism ;)
I'm pretty sure it will be tried. Yet not all the problems in the world are due to lack of money. Anarcho-Capitalism is a LONG TERM goal. It deals with a lot more issues than those simply existing due to money. Yet I don't expect to see it in my life time... if it ever happens it'll be likely generations from now. Just taking stepping stones towards it.
If UBI has some magical way of not running afoul of my three points of concern that I mentioned, I haven't seen them yet. So if it does work it could be a good thing. Yet many things SOUND good until they are implemented. If they want to try it as an experiment... go for it.
Sadly governments don't seem to like to admit if an experiment fails... they just keep pushing it. That is also a concern. If it fails, will they take a step back?
On that note I have a nice anecdote from German politics:
we had the "Pendler-Pauschale". It was meant to endorse people to take jobs further away from home by giving them 50 cent per month for every kilometer to work.
A few years ago, when we had elections, some of our politics proclaimed: We want to get rid of these unnecessary subventions in the free market. People thought, 'hey they want to stop all this strange money flowing from state to corps' (see food subvention ie).
They got rid of one subvention after the election, they killed the Pendler-Pauschale.....
UBI has the potential to fulfill one of the bug goals of socialism; no extreme poverty. Thats why its kinda important to me.
My biggest problem with socialism has always been WHERE DOES IT COME FROM. The answer generally is they take it from people and redistribute it.
To me that is theft, unless it is voluntary. So a lot of my concerns will be around the idea that people think it is okay to force other people to do things just because they think it is a good idea.
One size doesn't fit all. Yet so many systems try to pretend it does.
UBI though we will see. :)