The harm of Chemotherapy drugs and the B17 Vitamin as an alternative to a cancer cure
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy only works 2.3% of the time in Australia and 2.1% in the US [01].
It started when doctors noticed how bone marrow was affected by Mustard Gas, which damages DNA. Nitrogen Mustard (Mustargen) was tested on a patient simply known as JD who had cancer in the lymph nodes. The gas succeeded in reducing the size of the tumor but was not permanent.
These drugs are sold as a means of curing cancer but damage the rest of the body as well.
The average lifespan of someone after chemo is about 6 months (for more severe cases) to 3 years, compared to the 12 years of those who refused the treatment [02].
Adriamycin, Alkeran, Cytoxan, Dacarbazine, Leukeran, Myleran, Thiotepa, Zanosar,
and Nitrogen Mustard (HN3) are some of the most toxic substances you can deliberately put into your body and are all carcinogenic [03].
Amygdalin (a-myg-da-lin), otherwise known as Vitamin B17.
The enzyme beta-glucosidase (beta-glu-cos-i-dase) breaks the Nitriloside (ni-tril-oside) known as Amygdalin down into it's component parts and toxic Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN) is released. The B17 cyanide is released only when cancerous cells are recognized by their high glucosidase content.
The primary source of Amygdalin are apricot kernels (The seed found within the hard pit {Stone} of the apricot). Bitter apricot kernels which weigh about 0.6 grams, contain about 0.3% Amygdalin (1.8mg), while sweet kernels are about 0.05% (0.3 mg).
Other fruit seeds containing large amounts of Amygdalin include apple, cherry, nectarine,
orange, peach, pear, plum, and prune seeds [04].
A triturating juicer is needed to extract the drug.
Another option includes Cannabis or Turmeric powder.
Laetrile Case Histories; The Richardson Cancer Clinic Experience
62 case histories proving beyond any doubt that Laetrile (Vitamin B17)
works in the control of cancer.
“Dr. David Rubin of Israel has reported using high dosages of Laetrile
(70 gm/day) and getting good results with breast cancer and bone cancer patients, though leukemia patients did not respond.”
“Dr. Manuel D. Navarro, in 1962 presented a paper at the Eighth International Cancer Congress, describing several case histories and reporting that much higher doses of laetrile than previously used were proving to be much more effective.”
B17 is really helpful in this.
I just posted about new findings regarding chemotherapy that I think you would like to take a look at:
https://steemit.com/medicine/@deismac/new-research-july-2017-reveal-that-chemotherapy-is-acctually-contributing-to-metastase
Congratulations @theinvertedtower! You have received a personal award!
Click on the badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about this award, click here
your percentages are off by an order of magnitude.
That said...go for it.
Looking at the weight of the Kernel (0.6g), the actual amount of Amygdalin was 1.8mg (0.3%) and 0.3 mg (0.05%) for the sweet variety. Thanks for pointing it out.
You earned a cake:
rule #5 (Alinsky's rules for radicals)
Chemotherapy saved my father's life 8 years ago, and he has had no long-term ill effects. Of course it's extremely toxic and destructive; it's supposed to be. That's how it works.
Your post is an insult to good medicine everywhere.
To those clients of my bot whose accounts voted for this, I apologize. It won't happen again with this account.
It would appear that your father is not suffering any damage that would appear externally.
He is very fortunate, but much like the Fluoride in the water, we don't see the long term damage without looking inside our bodies. With that said, you didn't say that Amygdalin wouldn't work. So wouldn't it be more preferable?
I don't know anything about Amygdalin. Here's the cold truth: when an oncologist says "if we do chemo, your father has an 80% chance of survival; if you don't do chemo, he'll die within 2 years," then you choose to do chemo. Long-term effects be damned.
Wait... Do you mean to say that your clients don't get to decide what their bots vote on?
Nope, and I don't choose which posts my bot votes for either. My bot is content-unaware; it simply votes to maximize curation rewards. My clients like me because my bot is the most efficient curator on Steemit: http://steemwhales.com/trending/?p=1&d=14&s=cr
I'd be happy to add your posting key to the bot as well!