Steemit Developer @sneak Hides Two Highly Revealing Posts Related To Verifiable Student Actors Involved in Florida School Shooting

in #censorship7 years ago (edited)

28060901_176679196394042_7084607251120610141_o.jpg

This has happened twice now. @sneak hid the first post three days ago on February 21. I then made a post about the hiding of the other post by @sneak and included an explanation of how I remedied the situation. That explanation was to Steemit member @nationalpark. I also discussed this situation with a few other important Steemit members in the comment section of the two other posts. On February 24th @sneak hid the post addressing the explanation. He also hid my newest post which is a highly revealing condensed version of the large post that I put together to help better explain the verifiable (via their own Facebook pages) student actor aspects of the Parkland shooting event. That post also reveals some very important new material on other child actors.

All three posts are linked here -

Hidden by @sneak

https://steemit.com/news/@clarityofsignal/extensive-post-reveals-anomalies-and-child-actors-involved-with-parkland-school-shooting-in-florida-on-february-14-2018

Hidden by @sneak

https://steemit.com/news/@clarityofsignal/reassessment-of-students-hopeful-actors-reporters-filmmakers-placed-on-camera-by-mainstream-media-for-antigun-campaign-messages

https://steemit.com/news/@clarityofsignal/florida-school-shooting-censored-on-steemit-blatant-censorship-by-sneak-on-one-of-the-most-revealing-posts-ever-on-steemit-post

Explanatory comment (offshoot discussion) hidden by @sneak -

by @nationalpark

I believe Steem was created to resist censorship and most steemian don't like censorship. However, before you get my support, I would like to ask a few questions:

The photos are graphic, would you consider to add a warning at the top or use nsfw tag?
Do you have the copyrights of the photos your posted?
Are you sure you can post the photos of the minors? Do you have the permission of the parents of the minors?

$0.00

1 vote

Reply

[-]
clarityofsignal (60) · 2 days ago

All images come from open Facebook pages that the individuals chose to post on the Internet themselves to their own Facebook pages. I actually acquired them from someone else who collaborates with me from time to time, thus, I believe they fall under fair use, particularly in view of the fact these are now well known figures currently under scrutiny in the public eye and who are being researched heavily by the general public.

They are boosting their own presence on major 'news' networks around the world, thus, one would figure also that they would expect such scrutiny or else restrict public viewing of their pages to prevent it. Another way to look at it is in reverse, would they hope to have their images seen by talent scouts for their acting ability as shown on their Facebook pages if it should further their acting careers? For example, I have compiled hundreds of images of the White Helmets in Syria (who are terrorists posing (acting) as rescuers). I have researched them thoroughly for the past two years.

I consider it a public service and for the good of humanity that I help reveal their al-Qaeda deception. Should I have asked them for permission to use their images? Would the terrorists have removed the images that they previously placed on their own open Facebook pages if I had ask them for their permission? You can see where this goes.
The fair use doctrine recognizes that rigid application of copyright laws in certain cases would be unfair or may inappropriately stifle creativity or stop people from creating original works, which would harm the public. So, the doctrine allows people to use someone else’s copyrighted work without permission in certain circumstances. Common examples include: criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research.

There is actually only one supposedly graphic photo amongst those used for the post and it is blurry and shot from a distance and shows a dark skinned woman who appears deceased on the floor (she is receiving no medical attention, thus the assumption). I left a message with that image that CNN's own website does not feature a dark skinned female amongst the 17 deceased victims they have posted images of online. Thus, its possible she is an actor also.

The rest of the images that appear to look graphic are actually images from the make up artist that administers their teen antigun advocates acting troupe. They are fake injuries made to look real, hence the reason I posted them. The nsfw tag is now attached, although I don't really think it is necessary. I am simply posting it to placate the few people that are concerned in regards to such.

$0.03

1 vote

Reply Edit

[-]
nationalpark (63)

· yesterday
Thanks for the explanation

Comments from @sneak to myself on February 24, 2018-

[-]
sneak (64)

· 6 hours ago

I flagged his post because baseless conspiracy nonsense like this doesn't deserve a cent in rewards. I couldn't care less about what is or isn't tagged NSFW. Shitposters (and apparently whiners who don't know what censorship is) shouldn't be earning here, in my sole personal opinion. I speak for no one but myself; any professional affiliation I may or may not have is irrelevant to my voting, as I vote with my own stake and no one else's.

$0.00
Reply

[-]
sneak (64)

· 6 hours ago
Downvotes aren't censorship, dipshit. Put your tinfoil hat back on.

$0.00
Reply

[-]
clarityofsignal (60) · 25 minutes ago

On such an important post it would have been professional of you to explain your desire to downvote the material. Incidentally, you haven't addressed the material and have instead resorted to demagoguery. Thus, your mentioning of tin foil hats says more about the person using the slur than the one it is directed against. Sad to see that one of the most important players at Steemit acts this way. You have also downvoted to hide a message from @nationalpark in this threads comment section.

On edit: I see you have tried to hide another one from fair public viewing. So now you have hidden two posts and the second one you just hid had no graphic images. The images in the post are of the students from Parkland who are verified via their own Facebook accounts as kids who are involved in the fields of acting, reporting and movie making. There are also make up artist images there of various types of fake wounds. I welcome your explanation as to why you hid that post and the other one before it. I would figure a Steemit developer would be very happy to have posts that receive over 3,000 views. Maybe I am wrong about that?

$0.00

1 vote

Reply Edit

[-]
dinodog1 (42)

· 8 minutes ago
Well said, I am astonished at how well you kept your cool. There should be no reason for flat out name calling on this platform. It defintely says alot about the person posting the words.

$0.00
Reply

[-]
clarityofsignal (60) · 14 seconds ago

Thanks @dinodog1. Sometimes the censorship actually works in my favor, as it highlights the actions of the person conducting the censorship and helps to paint a larger picture based upon those actions. Thus, if someone so high up amongst the leadership at Steemit shows this type of behavior I consider it a community service, and a service to humanity, for me to help highlight that type of behavior. It may end up being addressed by other top tier players who have a stake in Steemit doing well as a free speech platform and they may decide to help change things for the better. Who knows? Its particularly important to highlight people who hide information, especially in this new age of information censorship and control.

One thing I am astutely aware of these days is that there is no room for emotions in geopolitics. My responses to @sneak certainly aren't emotional and I appreciate you pointing that out, on the other hand his responses are quite unprofessional for a lead developer on the platform. Thanks for your comment. Kind regards.

Sort:  

Seems as if there are many people on Steemit so jacked up about the earning rewards that they tend to overlook the fact that some people post for the benifit of all. @clarityofsignal I may not agree with or believe anything you post, but I sure want to see it. It is up to me to do my own research and arrive at my own conclusions about the information in your posts. It is not my job to flag you in order to protect the community. Yes there needs to be some basic guidlines for governance on the platform. Steemit is not perfect in this regard I think most people would agree. Anyway, keep up the good work, keep posting. If you enjoy social experiments, I think Steemit is a great example. In my opinion, the payout rewards which lead to these flagging wars, often show us a less desireable side of our human nature.

"...people on Steemit so jacked up about the earning rewards that they tend to overlook..."

This is a basic problem that reduces every aspect of society to profiteering. Society is much more than an economy, and there are far more profitable things than profit. Many Steemit users exemplify this. Fortunately, there's only so much harm such profiteers can do on a social media platform. Some people whore out their mothers for cash.

Kinda hard to get to that level of inhumanity on a blog. Sooner or later, someone'll figger it out tho.

Thanks!

It's cooperation that will bring them down. They've lost control of the narrative and have gone into full damage control mode... it's great to watch and even greater to be a part of...
The good thing is the tighter they try to clamp down, the tighter the people band together

Without cooperation on our side that is able to overwhelm the sheep that just do as they're told, it won't save us against what's coming.

@freebornangel recently posted about China's total surveillance state, and social control system, that changes the ring on your phone when you call, or are called by, one the the blacklisted. Folks on that list can't buy plane tickets, for example.

@maxigan and @x22reports have both predicted the power shifting to the east globally, to China. The EU is now drafting all kinds of laws against 'fake news', and Whatsapp, owned by Fakebook is essentially doing what China does on phones with material Fakebook, the owner of Whatsapp, doesn't like.

They say it's always darkest before the dawn. Let's hope dawn approaches soon, because they're coming for us, too. @benswann just came on Steemit after going dark for a year. He also just got hit with a large flag. I saw it on the list of the most heavily flagged Steemers I turned out to be on and was notified of a mention by Gina.

That was interesting!

While I hope it's about to dawn a new day of freedom and freedom of speech globally, I fear the dark night of disinformation is yet sucking more of the light of truth from out of our sight.

We'll have to be watchful. In Honduras right now, US trained police are rounding up protesters after electoral hyjinx there.

The enemedia won't televise the counter-revolution. We'll have to have each other's backs.

Thanks!

Thanks @dinodog1. When this situation first occurred the other day I specified that I would transfer all cryptocurrency derived from those posts to @PatrickLancaster who I know as a friend and does charity work for affected kids and families in the breakaway regions of East Ukraine. That declaration still stand for this post as well. I have never been about the money, although I am also not against it. I do what I do simply because I believe humanity deserves better than what we are getting from our current world 'leaders' who are deceptive assholes that are enriching themselves from war and surveillance/control over the rest of us.

I hope more people see my example and take similar action to bring the truth to light as best they can. My personal view is that humanity needs an evolution, not a revolution. I think we can do this simply by continuing to share important information and finding ways to work around the elites mainstream media wall of propaganda, censorship and deception that is placed in front of us. That is a challenge that I gladly accept. Kind regards for looking at the material even if you may disagree with it. I don't mind and I hope it is simply taken into consideration by discerning, fair-minded people.

Amen, by the way I followed Patrick because of your posts. Humanity deserves better. In all my travels all over the world I learned we have more in common with each other than we believe. The governments create the majority of the human suffering and there seems to be a few select people controlling them. Hopefully one day we can evolve.

That is one of the most profound statements I have been fortunate enough to read.

Thanks!

Thank you for all your lengthy comments addressing this situation above. Great work.

@clarityofsignal I may not agree with or believe anything you post, but I sure want to see it. It is up to me to do my own research and arrive at my own conclusions about the information in your posts.

Lucky for you (and him, I guess), you're able to do that no matter how many flags he receives. In that capacity, I'm not sure what anyone is complaining about.

That is one huge bonus to Steemit. to be able to see what others flag and be the judge yourself.

Congratulations @clarityofsignal! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of comments received

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Upvote this notification to help all Steemit users. Learn why here!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.25
TRX 0.19
JST 0.037
BTC 94103.03
ETH 3331.64
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.90