Do you even consider this interactionist approach as a

Do you even consider this interactionist approach as a special social group? Why do I say it especially because not every social group can be called a society, but my now is also a social group? In a sense, what is the difference between a society as a social group I would say that society is a big real and potential self-sufficient social groups, this requires a certain clarification of the great opposite of small something big that is not a small small group this group is mediocre contact is a group of immediate emotional relationships like you all and this is something about each other experiencing and arranging this property is not necessarily small groups it and big can have common goals this property is already really here society is not only a large group is not always all each other know something in relation to each other feel it is a real group The real group is different from the nominal nominal group it's just a collection of people allotted by You know how you want in foot size Or for example students a real group are people who really have some common goal about irregularly interacting for the sake of achieving a common goal they have some kind of common We Russians and an important feature is a potentially autonomous social group what this means it means that this is a social group which in principle is able to provide the conditions of one's being And thus reproduce themselves that there are social groups short-lived for several days or several months several years on Well, for example the school class he lives several years there is a society this long