First, I really like your posts because of the constantly positive take you have on things. I admire that because it's easy to focus on the negative, and you do a good job of being consistently positive.
I would make one distinction in your post and that is the difference between "money" and "currency." We often use them interchangeably nowadays, but they're different.
Currency is:
- medium of exchange
- unit of account
- portable
- durable
- fungible (interchangeable)
Money is:
- All of the above
- Store of Value over time
Cryptocurrencies are currencies. They aren't issued by a central bank, but they're still a currency as they aren't a store of value over time. Since more cryptocurrency is being created, the value of it goes down as the currency inflates. They're also created by someone, whereas money already exists in limited supply, therefore the amount can't be increased.
I think SMTs could be a huge boost to Steem, and I do think that's valuable, but because they're going to be currencies, we'll have to be careful which SMTs we invest in. Because like Venezuela's Bolivar, you have to have faith in the organization that issued it. If you trust the wrong people, your investment can easily go to nothing.
I'm not sure we'll ever really be able to "demonetize money." The "quantitative easing" that US government has been doing since 2008 has been to increase the availability of currency, but all they're doing is inflating the currency to make that currency available.
You can demonetize a currency. That happens all the time when governments inflate the heck out of their currency and then have to demonetize it and start all over. I don't know that you can demonetize money. Money (gold and silver) just is. As far as I know, only Midas has ever been able to make more of it. Ha ha.
Thanks for a thought-provoking article! I'd love to hear your thoughts. :)
I'd point you to www.bibocurrency.com and mention that the function of measurement is invalidated by the function of storing value in the same way that the function of a unit of measure of length is invalidated by making a specific length of rope as the only unit of measure. The site though does a much more thorough job at demonstrating how one function invalidates the other functions of currency and details exactly why money is, and what is only tokens or stores of value, as money and currency don't have any difference since currency by it's very tangible premise of your definition with "portable, durable" is describing a store of value.
Posted using Partiko Android
Also by following the link I'm persuaded to mention that, as Benjamin Franklin observed in his treatsie on Paper Currency, gold and silver don't make good stores of value and even worse at providing the necessary amount for world commerce let alone to compensate work.
http://projects.exeter.ac.uk/RDavies/arian/amser/chrono.html
Posted using Partiko Android