The Hard Fork 20 Fiasco Was The Best Thing To Happen To STEEM AND Who Is Responsible!!!!steemCreated with Sketch.

in #busy6 years ago

What an incredible few days. Hard Fork 20 was the best thing that ever happened to the STEEM blockchain.

Yesterday's post dealt with my conclusions about some of what is taking place. This expressed what I believe the benefits of the hard fork to be.

https://busy.org/@taskmaster4450/connecting-the-dots-resource-credits-will-make-steem-a-lot-more-valuable

Today, I am going to deal with why the fiasco that took place was the best thing to ever happen to STEEM. The hard fork, itself, is going to do wonders for STEEM yet it might pale in comparison to what else took place.

There is a lot of finger pointing, whining, and complaining. Many are upset with what took place. Here are some of the sentiments expressed both on STEEM and Telegram.

STEEM is done.
Steemit failed us.
The Whales want to destroy STEEM.
It is only for the rich to get richer.
They want to get rid of the Planktons.
I can't do anything.
Steemit are liars, crooks, and/or incompetent.

I could go on but you get the point.

Now I am going to lay it all on the line for everyone.

We getting exactly what is deserved. The truth of the matter is it is our own fault. We created this so it is time for us to own up to it..

This is blockchain, We all need to learn what is going on.

Steemit.com does not run nor update the blockchain. Yes, they are the ones who write the code for it. They also can make suggestions and try to influence what is adopted. However, what took place is not their fault.

Steemit.com cannot implement anything.

The Witnesses appeared to be at fault. In fact, I mistakenly called them out. But the more I think about it, this is incorrect. Sure, they might have been ignorant to the testnet, too distracted to fully use it, or too complacent. At the same time, they might have been nervous about going counter to what Steemit.com suggested.

Whatever the reasons, this is not the Witnesses fault either.

image.png
Source

The responsibility lies with us. This is our blockchain. In the past I wrote about dedication and commitment to the blockchain. With that, comes responsibility. The fact that we absolve ourselves of it means we get what we deserve.

One of the biggest advantages to the blockchain is that there is no central entity that runs it or owns it. We are the ones who are the stakeholders. This includes those with 1M SP or the newbie with .001 SP. Both are stakeholders in the ecosystem and have, not only a say, but a responsibility, to what is going on.

Now some of you might be thinking that I am getting a bit too intense about this. After all, this is only a social media site. Placing responsibility for an online place where I post and upvote on top of everything else in my life is absurd.

Well if it is only a social media site, why the upset about the hard fork issues? If that is the case, then it matters little.

You see, people cannot have it both ways. If this is just a social hangout site, then whatever happens means little. We all have been on sites that ended up shutting down. We moved on, not the end of the world.

If, however, STEEM is a lot more than that, and judging by the reactions, it is, then we have the responsibility to step up our game and do our part.

The witnesses are the ones who decided to adopt the software upgrade that is Hard Fork 20. They are the line of defense between us, the community, and Steemit.com. Yes, as it turns out, things went poorly and the witnesses embraced something they should not have (at least in the manner/timing it was done).

Yet, the truth is we are the ones who put them in that position. Whatever the faults of the witnesses, they are only there because of us. We are the ones who have control over that.

The process starts with voting. This is where the STEEM community completely fails. Ironic, the ones screaming the loudest, just from looking up a few accounts, are the ones who seem not to vote at all. If you cannot even be bothered to vote for a few witnesses, how can you complain about what is happening?

Worse than not voting at all is upvoting 30 witnesses on a whim and then forgetting about it. This is another sign of absolving ourselves of responsibility.

I mean seriously, if one is renting a place, and a pipe breaks, is that person going to sit and complain about or do something about it? Doesn't one get off the couch to shut the water off? Isn't it true that one gets his or her stuff out of the way? Perhaps grabs a few towels to dry things up.

Why does this person do it? Because he or she is a stakeholder.

Yet, we seem not have the same mindset with STEEM.

image.png
Source

Of course, many will say that they have so little voting power it makes no difference. That could be true on an individual basis but on a collective basis, votes from a few thousand Planktons could move a witness from 22 to 20 or vice versa. That is a huge difference in that witness' standing.

Voting is not the only thing that is required. How much do we vet these witnesses? Those without voting power, did you write a post or two about particular witness or asking some questions? It could be true that nobody would read it since you have no following yet, if you use the #witness tag, there are many who go through that.

There are other ways to get to these witnesses. @dragosoura is a prime example. He is a witness who posts a few times a day. If someone went to one of his posts and asked a witness question, I feel certain he would answer it. If the subject was important enough, he most likely would turn it into a post. And I can assure you he would not look at one's STEEM Power to determine whether he should answer or not.

Discord is also a mecca for witnesses. Utopian has a discord channel where a lot of witnesses hang out. I do not frequent it since they speak a lot of geek but that does not mean it is inaccessible. Many of you heard me mention @mcfarhat, the main developer for @actifit. He is very active in the @actifit Discord room, approachable by anyone. Do you know where else he frequents? The Utopian room since he does speak geek. If anyone posed a question to him about anything to do with witnesses, I am sure he would not hesitate to ask it on our behalf.

I believe there are many others on this blockchain who would do the same thing.

There are just a couple ideas off the top of my head about ways we all can be more attentive to what is taking place here. It is a mistake to blame others when this is our blockchain. We are the stakeholders. Yes, so are the witnesses but we are the ones who need to hold them accountable.

@wwf had a wonderful post about this. He is one with an IT background and yet he failed to address certain issues. As noted in his post, he will not make that mistake again. The next proposed hard fork, he clearly stated he will be asking the hard questions. Good for him. That is him taking responsibility for his part.

https://busy.org/@wwf/trust-is-a-fickle-creature

For all the issues, Hard Fork 20 being such a cluster-you-know-what put us all on notice. It is time to turn that into the positive. What are we going to learn from it AND, more importantly, what will we do differently? This is how we move passed this in an upward manner.

Fortunately, we are already seeing the benefits to this:

Here is a video with @lukestokes who is very candid about what took place and his views on the situation. He owns up to his part in, perhaps, not doing all he could with the testnet.

https://busy.org/@lukestokes/steem-is-broken-a-conversation-with-sida-of-partiko

Here is a post by @aggroed, of @steemmonsters fame, talking about the Hard Fork and the benefits. He owns up to the fact that the rollout was not great in the title. Nevertheless, this does provide insight into why he thinks the RC/HF is a good thing.

https://busy.org/@aggroed/hf20-has-incredible-potential-the-roll-out-has-been-less-than-awesome

And by the way, he hosts a Witness Forum where anyone is free to join in. Here, again, we see a resource available to us. Perhaps more Steemians will participate from now on since we saw what happens when we are remiss in our own responsibility.

https://busy.org/@aggroed/steem-witness-forum-tomorrow

@reggaemuffin wrote an epic article about changes that witnesses need to make. This is the proverbial taking of lemons and making lemonade. It is a must read for all who care about the STEEM blockchain. He acknowledges the problems and is presenting ways to ensure things are better in the future.

https://busy.org/@reggaemuffin/witness-statement-for-reggaemuffin-proposing-hardfork-adoption-requirements

By the way, the ones I linked to here happen to be on my Witness voter list, which should tell you what I think about them. However, do you own due diligence to determine who to vote for.

Also, I would caution against only looking for witnesses who post a lot of content. There are many who are fabulous geeks (I say that with great admiration) yet are not writers or big time content creators. They might be too busy coding and doing other things on the blockchain that we do not see.

The final point I want to make with this is that we are seeing some people step up and take responsibility.

@fulltimegeek announced that he was starting a Witness node over a week ago. I believe he announced it after the blockchain went down the first time. Either way, I explained my view in a post yesterday as have many others. The one post I will link with this is one by @edicted showing where @fulltimegeek now stands.

https://busy.org/@edicted/fulltimegeek-is-already-99-witness

I will reiterate that anyone who has been on here for more than a few months has seen what @fulltimegeek is all about. Believing that he will take the best interests of the community into his actions as witness is not a giant leap. He operated that way without being a witness.

Another one who stepped for is @fknmayhem. He is heavily involved with @steemhunt, one of the more successful DApps on this blockchain. He posted yesterday his intention to set up a witness server after the first of the year. In fact, according to the article, there are a few people involved with him in this endeavor.

https://busy.org/@fknmayhem/i-wasn-t-going-to-post-about-hf20-yet-i-am-going-to-post-about-hf20

One thing I can say about @fknmayhem, and you can see it in the tone of the post, punches are not withheld. This is a serious cat who is intent of driving things forward.

In fact, this gem is from that article:

There needs to be more pressure on this chain. Pressure to achieve excellence. On all possible levels.

It took me almost 1800 words to express what was said in a handful. This is what it is all about.

image.png

Source

The benefit of the fiasco that accompanied Hard Fork 20 is that it served as a wake up call to all on here. It is our responsibility to learn what is going on while putting pressure on those who are entrusted with our collective best interest. If someone is not getting the job done, then it is up to us to remove our vote while spreading the word as to why.

Here is the bottom line: if we do not like something, it is imperative that we make the witnesses aware of what our views are. At the same time, we need to pressure them into action. If that requires them going to Steemit.com and having something different done, then that is what is needed.

Fortunately, it appears this mishap was as much of a wake up call for the witnesses as it was for the rest of us.

The golden age of STEEM is ahead of us.

When I was drinking, I was piledriven into the pavement by alcohol. That was not the end of me but the start. We all were driven into the ground by this Hard Fork. Yet do not believe for a second it is the end of STEEM.

Instead, it is only the beginning of something much bigger and better.


If you found this article to be informative, please give it an upvote and resteem.

Sort:  

I like this long but great post so much, that I simply can not walk away without resteeming it first. Thanks OG @taskmaster4450

It's a good example of why we need to be diligent and not take a blockchain for granted. Every user is responsible for keeping it running properly.

Thank you for pointing out what can be done to improve things instead of just focusing on the negatives. And thank you for pointing to my interview after the fork. Before the fork, I did a video trying to help set expectations about the resource credit system, but little did I imagine it would have been this challenging. Right as the hard fork went live, I posted details about my own witness testing standards, but ironically enough my main account had negative RC, so I had to post it on my witness account. This rollout was a mess. No doubt about it.

What matters now is what we do about it going forward. The Steem blockchain is a shared collaborative commons. Everyone who owns Steem and Steem Power has a say in what it will become. Let's work to improve and protect what we care about.

You are welcome @lukestokes. And thank you for your dedication as a witness. I am glad that I cast my vote for you. I applaud your interview and owning up to what happened from your perspective.

The fiasco is over, no it is time to clean up after the hurricane. As we move forward, we all need to band together. We will have different ideas about things but the entire ecosystem is important to all of us.

One of the most important things to do is to spread information (and for the community to read it).

I think RC will be a major benefit to STEEM going forward. It will just take some time.

Agreed! It’s important that we treat the blockchain as though we are part owner... because we kinda are! We should we stwards of the chain, not just exploiters of it.

we stwards of the chain, not just exploiters of it.

Sensational quote....great way to phrase it.

Glad it resonated with you.

I am not getting your logic here. The responsibility for the HF20 problems is not with the people that programmed it and approved it? This makes little sense. We as voters can only respond after an issue occurs. There were no issues of this type while I have been here. We as voters and creators can not preemptively vote people in and out because there maybe a problem sometime in the future.

We need a larger developer community that can monitor proposed software upgrades to make sure the upgrades don't blow up the blockchain.

I agree with you my friend and I would go one step further. I would suggest that we are so complacent in our lives that we would rather wait for problems to be fixed than take responsibility for ourselves. That applies to this blockchain, political systems, financial system and even economic systems.

When we decide to take 100% responsibility for our lives, we have nobody to blame but oneself. Few are ready for that level of responsibility. However, this blockchain is teaching us all an important lesson. Even if nothing else comes of this HF, if it helps teach people how to be responsible and participate fully, then it has been a success.

There is no great centralized oz that is going to help us. We need to get off our asses and do it ourselves. Welcome to the new order, one without parents, feudal lords, slave owners or tyrants governing our lives. Important skills to learn and I think this blockchain is a wonderful teaching opportunity for those lessons to run deep.

Thank you for your post. It has even helped me. <3

It's been a very learning experience this week. I appreciate your insights and posts this week. I thoroughly read and enjoyed your post from other day discussing the "Freemium" model and I agree with a lot of your points here.

After HF20 was approved Tuesday and implemented, we knew that we had to do better in future. We did test on testnet since Aug.27, but that wasn't enough. We have to do better and we will

It's important for witness's to post their standards for future HF's.

If you have time, you can take a look at what we posted about this.

https://steemit.com/witness-update/@followbtcnews/with-hf20-now-live-it-s-time-for-a-look-at-the-process-a-statement-from-one-of-the-consensus-witnesses

Thanks for the nice words about my witness work, really appreciate it. I would kindly point to a small typo, my username is actually @dragosroua (not @dragosoura).

Steem on!

Commented from my other account, to test RC consumption, but yes, it's still me :)

A couple of points I didn't see in there: 1) Top witnesses chat in a private channel 2) There is little to no documentation on the code which makes testing, evaluating, etc as an open source community almost impossible.

Witnesses should demand fully commented code with flow charts and all the other things specs normally have. Then, the community can get behind evaluating a product on the test net that can prevent the kind of clusterfuck we just witnessed.

I would find it helpful for people to post the witnesses that they vote for and why they vote for them. I see very little in the way of discussion around this.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.21
TRX 0.13
JST 0.030
BTC 68152.98
ETH 3536.22
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.86