You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: PSYCHOANALYTICAL VIEW on the MOST INTRIGUING MINDS in CINEMA HISTORY, Jake Lamotta, Raging bull– matko-MD
Great post. Here in Brazil, Borderline Disorder has been interpreted very roughly. Much to follow very strictly the literature of recent descriptive psychiatry, with the CID and DSM, I liked how you brought it in the text. I believe that the disorders of cluster B, are still within the structure of neurosis, being Bordeline, still a name that does not satisfy me. Of course I am speaking of opinion, and not of scientific knowledge, where it is well characterized in the literature. So my diagnostic is Borderline Disorder too, differential can be depressive disorder persistent (dsm -5) or dysthymia ( cid f34.1), in psychoanalysis I understand that it would be in the structure of neurosis, but only hearing it to really know.
I agree with you about the differential diagnosis. Had a depressive decompensation definitely during the movie, dysthimic at best. And I'd like to hear as many opinions on that subject as I can, specially by people from our field, as I also think that some things needs to be revised in nomenclature and categorization of mental disorders, as well as psychopharmaceuticals .