You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Ow here we go, the Bid Bot users aren't too happy with the trash control IT'S STARTING BOIS. I mean when you want to make sure a good thing keeps going, won't stop me now.
You don't even know how it works you idiot.
That's not what I spent that's what I've earned.
Barely breaking the 50% mark even.
I make great content that shares steemians with the other members of the community.
As I said, you are blindly flagging regardless of the content.
I did spend money to get to trending.
I also put a disclaimer in my post stating that, as well as used the hashtag #advertisedcontent
I bought votes for visibility... Which I have the right to do...but it's organic growth that's keeping me there.
Hey you're welcome to do with your stake as you please, just like the rest of us.
Have a great day.
Right firstly. the 54% mark is exactly how much you've used to promote your content so fair enough, 54% of 455 SBD as full curation rewards is SBD 245.7 used with rocky1, buildawhale, booster and appreicator. I'll admit I got the numbers wrong, spur of the moment but I'm pretty sure you've not when paying for the bots.
If it's great content, let the community decide! By you paying for votes, the curation value is now manipulated and can't be used correctly. That means you are misleading people. You are taking spots of the top trending list and quite frankly it is very unfair for someone who doesn't have the funds. Why not pay 5% to get to hot and if your content is that fantastic, let people decide. Infact we could even test that logic via you going to Reddit and seeing how well that content does.
You stating it's good content is your opinion but I mean you backing that up via the means of bid bots? I mean you can try to argue it's advertising but you are misleading people because of the curation. Why not in the title say "200SBD Boosted" because it would push people away before reading because no one wants to read content which is boosted but you mislead that.
Also the meme, you see as soon as you have to stoop there, the argument stands nothing and I will continue to downvote and push others to do so. If your organic reach is that good, you don't need to be doing what you're doing. Justify your good content by putting even 5% in and when it gets in hot, let people decide for it. In your own words.
**"I make great content that shares steemians with the other members of the community."
**
Okay so if it hits hot, with that logic, it will make it because the content is good enough to stand it's ground. Trending isn't "this is okay content" no it's content that's fantastic to share and can't be missed. As Rand Fishkin would say, good content isn't good enough but we're looking for fantastic content so to state that your helping Steem seems strange when you're effectively lowering the bar. Interesting. Thinking about it, you're putting the value of Steem down. Quite sad I guess.
I just realized you dance to trance music...I'm really sorry, I didn't know you were special.
I'll leave you alone now.
Thank you so much for judging content without even looking at it.
It all makes sense now.
I want to thank you for your pitiful flag.
You have a good day lil fella.
So you're judging someone on the basis because of what music they like and you're trying to get people to read a disclaimer on the basis for them to "be understanding" and then curate you. There seems to be a bit of a disconnect there. Don't worry though, I'm sure your great content would last without the bid bots. Try it, I'm near certain you'll not get to trending. To try and act the bigger man is quite laughable. Good luck because you'll need it soon! I hear they are changing the way curation voting will operate!