"almost bloggers" - hits the mark perfectly with me.
On a serious note. I find this post very interesting and in good way. You focus on the idea of positive reinforcements and I am on board that ship 100%. You also mention about the attention being given to negative aspects (bid bots, reward pool rapes, etc.) is distracting from what is actually the main point of us all being here - content.
Internet has been seeded with so much crap that the it is practically impossible to focus on the worthwhile stuff through the fumes. On the other hand blockchain is newly exposed to that. While with internet we never had the chance to weed out the craplings - perhaps not weed out but rather point out the way to them in a comprehensive manner; but with blockchain (thankfully being immutable and all) we need this pointing out for the sake of course correction.
Then again, too much of finger pointing would really distract us from the creation of content and thus value, here on steemit. So agreed and approved and upvoted and............................cheers!
PS: That 10$ billion really did catch my fancy :-)
Thanks :-) Thing is, the abuse fighting has been made hard from the ground up by the design decisions laid out in the whitepaper. If the HF20 (or a subsequent one) modify those in a meaningful way and erects "discouraging abuse" to the status of a principle then fighting the residual abuse that one can never completely prevent becomes much more efective and eficient