Opposition to immigration a major factor responsible for Brexit?

in #brexit5 years ago (edited)

Right ho, Britain! Brexit complete! Jolly Good! Cheers! Hip, hip, Hooray!

Tonight we're all British.

So the UK has now joined the increasingly long list of countries determined to commit political and economic suicide over the issue of immigration.

It's pretty clear that this - more than the economy, more than education, more than healthcare, more than any of the usual issues - is THE defining issue of our time. And, as always, I have to ask myself WHY.

Is it racism? Depends on how you define racism, I suppose. The anti-immigration crowd is mostly comprised of disgusting xenophobic bigots, for sure, but their bigotry isn't quite drawn along racial lines. These are the people who love Kanye West and nearly elected Ben Carson, they might not have the most enlightened views on race relations but they're not White supremacists either. They're nationalists, but they aren't ethno-nationalists. In the UK, a lot of anti-immigrant sentiment is directed at White Polish immigrants, while Indians are seen as better assimilated and face less discrimination. Liberals and leftists often joke about how xenophobes are scared of brown people, but in truth, xenophobia tends to be based around culture and nationality much more than skin color.

Still, I don't think bigotry is the only factor. The US has a long history of anti-immigrant panics, each targeting whichever ethnic outgroup was fashionable to hate (Irish, Italians, Slavs, Asians), but the immigration question never dominated the political landscape as it does today. Something else is going on here.

Is it the economy? After all, two of the major concerns about immigrants are that they're taking people's jobs and that they're abusing our social services - both concerns that are fundamentally economic. It's tempting to believe that if times were better, if people weren't struggling so much, they'd be more tolerant. It also provides the economic left with a compelling narrative: xenophobia is a response to the widespread poverty and financial hardships caused by late-stage capitalism, so all we need to do is improve quality of life for the working-class with leftist fiscal policies and all those nasty anti-immigrant sentiments will fade away. A nice, easy, simple solution to a complex problem, right?

Of course, that doesn't really check out either. The current wave of xenophobia - particularly the obsession with securing the Mexican border - started in the 90s and grew during the mid-00s, well before the financial crash of 2008. And while the economy has consistently gotten better since the mid-10s, the problem of xenophobia has gotten exponentially worse.

So if it's not just bigotry, and it's not just the economy, what's the root of the problem? One possible clue: Why is it that xenophobes almost always tend to be extremely conservative on social issues? After all, immigrants often tend to be socially conservative themselves. If you really care about preserving the nuclear family or traditional values or Christian morality, then wouldn't you support an influx of highly devout and highly traditionalist Catholic Latinos?

You can argue that it's because social conservatism and xenophobia are "right-wing" stances, but that's basically a tautology. They're only considered "right-wing" because right-wingers support them. That's not an answer, it's circular logic. And it's not simply political tribalism; almost all xenophobes tend to support economic protectionism and oppose free trade, despite the fact that the mainstream right favored trade and deregulation for decades. What led so many right-wingers to reject Reagan and Thatcher in favor of Trump and Boris Johnson?

Sort:  

So if it's not just bigotry, and it's not just the economy, what's the root of the problem? One possible clue: Why is it that xenophobes almost always tend to be extremely conservative on social issues?

Exactly my question too

@tipu curate

"So the UK has now joined the increasingly long list of countries determined to commit political and economic suicide over the issue of immigration."

Not at all! Having a stricter immigration policy should be the aim of every developed country; and for them to require that immigration be based on both legal application and the merit of the applicant. If countries essentially have open borders, in time they will be turned into the same kind of shit-holes as the countries from which many of these immigrants come.

"What led so many right-wingers to reject Reagan and Thatcher in favor of Trump and Boris Johnson?"

They have seen what illegal immigration, immigration based on lotteries, sponsorships, etc. has done to their respective countries, and want to put an end to it. Thank goodness, there are finally leaders willing to stand up for what is right, and protect their own people.

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.13
TRX 0.23
JST 0.031
BTC 81272.63
ETH 2061.57
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.76