Goodreads recently conducted a poll where members could vote on their favorite books of 2017. The results are as follows...
Best Fiction
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc4ec/fc4ec9895954fe957dffbf829cbf046c98289cb5" alt=""
Best Mystery and Thriller
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6748/b6748b3d73b7a1cb1df424481b25a38edc592d20" alt=""
Best Fantasy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3eb2a/3eb2abf375af1ba6a9d5519eeac0d3abd679c416" alt=""
Best Romance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/574cb/574cb92112fb8749e61f92a5a15868ce92b5d855" alt=""
Best Horror
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70188/7018895474c30ecdf08573a9bdbcce5876ff4c4c" alt=""
Of course, 'the best' anything is always highly subjective and a matter of personal taste. Perhaps you think a different book deserves the title more? Sadly, the masses would disagree; however, are such 'best' competitions simply popularity contests? Where authors who are well-known get in without actual writing merit?
You can see the full list of winning books here.