You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: A weekend at Steemfest 4..comedyopenmic#40
Instant classic. I started to tease you about not being included when you told me about it, but then I realized, that it's more accurate this way, because we all know I don't go to back slapping kool-aid parties just to fanboi, especially when doing so would cost a fortune.
You had a part in it, I can see it now....bugger.
Stop.
Elaborate.
I'll listen.
:)
You'll have to wait and see if I do sequel....
I can see your part in it now...
I have an idea for my bit, how about I swoop in and end the madness?
...you don't have enough RC's for that...
lmao..
You are a smart cookie, want to help with something I am trying to dig through?
I'm still not clear on your purpose , matey..
Let me put it this way, it is to prove the lack of decentralization on here, and to show who makes the most money off bidbots (stinc) via which accounts (any that are delegating to them now made before 1st April) and show when those accounts were created (before steemit start date April 1st 16), and as I said before, the top 20 witnesses are controlled by 1 account, that nobody knows whose it is named freedom, that is one of the accounts started 31st March.
Now if this is still not putting the puzzle together for you, you are simply never going to get it bro.
Some of the top 20 witnesses have never blogged, they get paid a lot, nobody knows who they are, freedom keeps them in the top 20, freedom was here before anyone else.
The top 20 witnesses have to agree, if any change in code (hard fork) is implemented, by controlling them, it guarantees any change ned wants to make, for more greed, is guaranteed. Hence bidbots, as he is making a fortune from them.
that's interesting.
suppose the other hundreds of witnesses decided to do a spontaneous fork.
Leave the current 'top twenty' witnesses with their version and start another stream of steem?