COUNT DANKULA has been found guilty!! ......part 2

A call to arms police reporting.... as a victim...?

Count Dankula was very clear - more than once in his YouTube videos- that he does not have Nazi sympathies, and denies being a racist.

He used the phrases that were the “most horrible phrases he could think of.”
Meechan says that he made the video to 'piss off' his girlfriend Suzanne, 29- who was in court to support him.
Meechan (Count Dankula) made exactly the same arguments in court.

Prosecutors disagreed with Meechan.

They said that the video was “an odious criminal act that was dressed up to look like a joke.”
.“…The Crown contention is that the inclusion of the dog is an attempt to muddy the waters around him making, producing and posting the video,”....
Prosecutors argued that the comedy video is “anti-Semitic in nature,” and could cause fear and alarm to the public and stoke religious hatred.

( it might cause some hatred of Scotts I suppose, but I don't think that was point was raised).

The prosecution claims that the video was aggravated by religious bigotry.
Crown prosecutors argued that Meechan “is colluding with his pug (😂😂😂) to use adorableness to trick people into gassing football stadiums full of people.”
.....“No, I’m not joking,” Lauren Southern tweeted it out. An independent journalist who was present in court.

Prosecutors asked Sheriff Derek O’Carroll to convict Meechan for the video.
The sheriff said. “He has made very, very, sure the phrase ‘gas the Jews’ is repeated over and over and over again.....”
“….. this is a toxic distillation of what he may call the best bits of his video....
….. the noxious phrase is uttered 23 times by him.”
The sheriff said the phrase “contains a clear threat of incitement to carry out a seriously violent act.”

(A with that, he mounted his unicorn, and left court. (sarc)

The judge sided with the prosecution who said “context and intent are irrelevant”

in a joke? In a joke?
Context is everything.

This is the definitions of hate crime from the citizens advice bureau, in the UK

What are hate incidents?
The police and Crown Prosecution Service have agreed a common definition of hate incidents.
They say something is a hate incident if the victim or anyone else think it was motivated by hostility or prejudice based on one of the following things:
disability ,race ,religion ,transgender identity ,sexual orientation.

if the victim or someone else 'thinks they were a victim.' - it can be reported as a hate crime.

This means that if you believe something is a hate incident it should be recorded as such by the person you are reporting it to. All police forces record hate incidents based on these five personal characteristics.
Anyone can be the victim of a hate incident.

ANYONE can be accused of a hate crime, depending on the feelings of the victim

it goes on...

What type of incidents can be a hate incident?
Hate incidents can take many forms.

verbal abuse like name-calling and offensive jokes .

here is the link for the full document..
https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/discrimination/hate-crime/what-are-hate-incidents-and-hate-crime/

So essentially this means anyone who is offended by anyone else - irrelevant of the perpetrators motives- is entirely dependent on the 'victims' feeling's.

We need to clog up the courts with legal cases....

Liberty minded individuals, conservatives, and anarchist have feeling's too. Can be offended too...

This has to be thwarted.
Time to stand up , and make sure you report any offense by the left.

Law's are equal for everyone right?

'White male' is racism and sexism, right?
'Male' is offensive to fluid gender identification, right?

Police report, after police report, after police report.....