RE: BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY: "Is Blockchain Technology about to unlock the secrets of the events of 9/11?"
Conspiracy? During a murderer crime, when was the last time you heard the phrase "conspiracy" throughout the investigation? Never, because during a crime, all evidence, all possible outcomes, and details are looked at regardless of what it may reveal. So to claim that the idea of reinvestigation of an International and Demoestic crime is "conspiracy" is not inly disgusting, its criminal in itself. Anyone whi claims conspiracies should be dropped and not talked about, also deserve complete investigation without immunity. This includes G. W. Busu, who himself said quote, "Conspiracies wont be tolerated", and thats a massive red flag to an investigation. But, alas, theres much evidence coming out now that 9/11 was an inside job, and its not even just Americans who know. Many people around the world are also aware it was fake. There is no conspiracy. Only an unsolved investigation.
There is no new evidence. It's the internet. Don't you think something that happened 15 years ago, there's not one university, not just american but anywhere in the world that has presented any explanation or evidence to bring validity to any of these fringe theories. Some people would rather believe the internet than the truth.
"bankholiday"
Wrong, there is new evidence. You'd understand this if you'd take the time to review the continuing investigations. Or even prior investigations. Especially those into Bldg 7. The 9/11 panel, after they were forced to conclude their investigation admitted to that they believed there was enough evidence to warrant charges for conspiracy to coverup. This is basic 9/11 knowledge. From 2006! And you're here arguing the same uneducated nonsense. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101300.html
15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi Nationals. Our allies to this day. GWB sealed 28 pages of the official report that outlined Saudi involvement, trying to hide the fact that the attack was supposedly carried out by our allies.
Even the White House Terror Chief Alleges CIA 9/11 Malfeasance and Cover Up.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/they-got-away-with-it-white-house-terror-chief-richard-clarke-alleges-cia-911-malfeasance-and-cover-up/
Firefighters that were there that day are still fighting to uncover the truth. These are professionals who saw and heard everything and refuse the official narrative.
https://www.ff911truthandunity.org/
Thousands of experts in engineering, aviation, architecture, senior military, law enforcement, government, & intelligence on record disputing or refuting the official investigation.
http://patriotsquestion911.com/
"The seismic signals propagating from New York on September 11, 2001, recorded at Palisades (34 km) and published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO), have here been subjected to a new critical study concerning their sources. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the nature of the waves, their velocities, frequencies, and magnitudes invalidate the official explanations which imply as sources the percussion of the twin towers by planes and the collapses of the three buildings, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7."
Dr. Rousseau is a former researcher in geophysics and geology at the National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) of France and a specialist in acoustic waves. He is also a member of Scientists for 9/11 Truth.
http://patriotsquestion911.com/
I could on and on and on. But something tells me you won't bother. Because, like most Americans, you have an opinion and you're going to stick to it. Seriously, you think your responses here were in the least bit intellectual? You added nothing to the conversation. Have some pride in yourself and get educated, your sniping is pathetic.
how do you define new evidence as something that came out from 2006? Define educated too. You got a GED or something like that?
Typical lazy response. If you bothered to click through the links, you would have found more than an article from '06 including peer reviewed studies and up-to-date studies on Bldg 7. You might want to check your grammar before trying to make a snarky response about my potential level of education. Stay the fuck out of this debate if you're not willing to take it seriously. There are families out there still trying to get to the truth of who murdered their loved ones, and all you're doing is proving what a know-it-all know-nothing you are while polluting the debate with snipe comments that mean and add nothing.
lol u mad? What families don't accept the truth of what happened? It's not a debate, much like the holocaust or sandy hook, what happened happened. Could we have done more to prevent it? Absolutely, unfortunately hind sight is always 20/20. But keeping these nameless and faceless accusations out that it was a hoax, or an inside job, or something else sinister is simply nonsense. So u guys can keep armchair engineering as much as you want, but you're wrong and need to get on with your lives. The blockchain isn't solving a damn thing here.
No, you only say it's not a debate because you're too lazy to read through the research and evidence from qualified researches and investigators. Including the 9/11 Commission. What kind of jack ass doesn't bother reading but will spend all this time denouncing the discussion as "nonsense"? You're a POS troll, that's you're only purpose in this discussion.
YoU'rE a PoS tRoLl. tHaTs YoU'rE oNlY pUrPoSe In ThIs DiScUsSiOn.
I will agree there are some wild speculation on what happened that day other than what we saw. But there are some pretty solid science based fact that do not work with the official narrative of what occurred. I don't want to get into speculation. I merely want to debate the hard science proposed by other scientist. I would like to see another investigation.
What scientists and from where? What branch of science? Do you even know which branch would be most relevant? Don't use words like "fact" and "hard science". Names, credible institutions, not trolls.
You were the first to "troll". So if you don't have any intelligent response maybe you shouldn't be making any comments.
"i do find that curious. I looked up about 40 names on linkedin and only found 1 with an actual account... 9/11 wasn't an inside job. I'm not an authority or a forensic engineer but theres no inside job and blockchain solving it is just as dumb as the conspiracy itself. I guess thats the internet tho, People believe anything on that there internet."
Your first comment. Does that fit your definition of a "troll"?