RE: How to Solve Fake News with Proof of Consensus and Blockchains
Yesterday an article was posted on steemit that advanced the idea the Russian diplomat to Turkey was not really shot. The autrhor to the post was so naive that he or she felt that the incident was fake cause it did not "look real like the movies" and because they did not think the body fell the right way.
if you read the author's orignal post and replies. It becomes very clear they know nothing about shooting, how bullets impact flesh or what happens when terminal energy is transfered from one mass to another mass.
None the less this article proclaiming fake news by someone who has no knowledge what so ever about that which they speak recieved a lot of consensus and upvoting .
The bottom line is that false information can obtain a consensus, and what is more important to remember , is that just because informaiton has consensus does not mean it is true.
Remember the old maxim .. Trust but verify most of the population believed the world was flat for long time after it was proven not to be the case.
Actually flat earth was never as widespread as we make it out to be today.
The point it flew over your head... actually no it was pretty well accepted by most during those times. Literacy levels were incredibly low and people were very superstitious.
America it wouldn't be the case.
Literacy Rates in Early America
The interesting thing about that is, the first globe (the Erdapfel) wasn't (reportedly) made until 1492.
I'm having a hard time figuring out why the inhabitants of a planet would wait 1800 years (assuming 275 BC was when they were "aware" their world was a ball) to create a model of their world, if they truly knew the shape. One thing is for certain though, they sure were creating a lot of flat maps during that time. ;)
Welcome to Steemit. Flag away.