You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Revisiting Steemland: a fairer and more transparent art market as a new "export"

in #blockchain6 years ago (edited)

As time and the artists's effort are two of the most valuable inputs, a fair price needs to take those into account, especially since the third ingredient, creativity, is subjective and hard to pin down. Steem allows artists to start recording their beginning to work on a piece, then record the number of hours that went into creating a given piece and thus offer a credible basis for the asking price.

I don't think the market is ever going to be willing to value art based on how many hours it took. There's probably a fair way to do it, but that probably isn't it, imo. It's too focused on the artist's perspective but not on the customer's perspective - they care about how the painting makes them feel a lot more than how much time it took to make.

It can also implement tracking of the ownership transfer, through a partnership with a transporter (still hard to pull off at this point in time). This way, the UPS delivery man taking signature from the buyer that the latter has received the carefully wrapped parcel with the painting in perfect shape could automatically trigger the release from escrow of the SBD to the artist.

I like this idea a lot, even if it will take time to be implementable.

Sort:  

I don't think the market is ever going to be willing to value art based on how many hours it took. There's probably a fair way to do it, but that probably isn't it, imo. It's too focused on the artist's perspective but not on the customer's perspective - they care about how the painting makes them feel a lot more than how much time it took to make.

In theory yes, but you need to realize that you have "survivor bias" - the current art market is purely narcissistic ... because a large chunk of people do not participate in today's market.

I'm talking about "expanding the size of the pie" ...

No, today's art buyers will probably never care about how many hours it took the artist to paint a canvas ... But ... my hypothesis (I may be wrong but my guts tell me that I'm right) is that there is a significant mass of people who do not dare, who stay away from today's art market precisely because they need an external "value benchmark".

The current art market is purely reflexive - people buy things because they like them (without caring about external objective parameters) and because "it's a famous artist" - i.e. "other people I look up to have bought this artist already" - this is "art" being treated as a cult / religion

Are only people ready to treat art as a cult enjoying art? On my side, I am often inclined to buy art but I refrain because I'm rational and I can't buy something which I might be wildly overpaying. So when you analyze and say "the market is not going to ... this or that", you don't see me and people like me in the market you are looking at, because we are not participating.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.18
JST 0.032
BTC 87663.71
ETH 3042.50
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.75