You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Segregated Trading Pairs Decrease Overall Liquidity
What's wrong with choice?
I kind of like it the way it is. It puts pressure on the different gateways to offer the latest and greatest. Openledger, who has been the dominant player certainly has been forced to step up their game in the competition with cryptobridge. Which benefits all.
The only exception where a joint gateway system would be good is the bigger coins like btc, eth and ltc. But there are talks and initiatives to manage this through atomic swap.
@funkit can you say more detail on the atomic swap discussions. I am sure a lot of Bitsharians would be interested in these matters.
It's in the works and we'll have more news about implementation soon. Further description of atomic swaps on Graphene chains here.
Thank you for the details. I heard about your announcement regarding the atomic swap. Definitely looking forward to learning more about scorum.
No. I can't because I'm not familiar with the terms and how it will all work. But I know Open Ledger has it in the BSIP they produced a few months ago. And I have overheard something about it in a Bitshares Hangout. I would ask Taconator if I were you. Fuzzy might also be a good resource.
Great thank you.
This is my opinion. I think joining gateways is going to take a lot of thought. Because the security of OL is not the security of DEEX and both of them are not the security of Cryptobridge. So with that said, gateway separation is equally as important as joining/the ease of understanding.
You cannot "JOIN" three different variables that are not identical. Right when "one of the joined platforms" lsoes access to x amount of tokens -- the ENTIRE JOINED ASSET IS AT RISK OF A LACK OF FAITH. Which is a MASSIVE problem.