Steemit and Bitshares founders talk to SATOSHI , READ IT , VERY INTERESTING!
Dan father of bitshares
" I am convinced that bandwidth, disk space, and computation time necessary to distribute and "finalize" a transaction will be prohibitively expensive for micro-payments. Consider for a second that the current banking industry is unable to provide a reasonable micropayment solution that does not involve depositing a reasonable sum and only allowing a withdraw after a reasonable sum has been accumulated.
Besides, 10 minutes is too long to verify that payment is good. It needs to be as fast as swiping a credit card is today.
Thus we need bit-banks that allow instant transfers among members and peer banks. Anyone can open a bit-bank but the system would, by necessity operate on some level of trust. Transfers in and out of the banks and peer-to-peer would still be possible but will be more costly. Thus, a bit bank could make money by enabling transfers cheaper and faster than the swarm with the added risk of trusting the bank. A bank has to maintain trust to make money.
"
Satoshi:
Re: Scalability and transaction rate
July 29, 2010, 01:00:38 AM
The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale. That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server. The design supports letting users just be users. The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be. Those few nodes will be big server farms. The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate.
Quote from: bytemaster on July 28, 2010, 07:59:42 PM
Besides, 10 minutes is too long to verify that payment is good. It needs to be as fast as swiping a credit card is today.
See the snack machine thread, I outline how a payment processor could verify payments well enough, actually really well (much lower fraud rate than credit cards), in something like 10 seconds or less. If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=423.msg3819#msg3819
DAMN SON!
TLDR
Satoshi showed you dont need fast block times
Some people are still going around convincing people that alcointestnetblockchains and bitcoin need faster blocktimes
If people were into bitcoin in 2010 do you really think they would be making altcoins if they understood what was up? Post your comments below
I don't like trolls.
https://steemit.com/@altcoinsin
You mean posting the truth is trolling? This is the truth
Says the troll.
Says the one that doesnt want to read the truth
You are reading Satoshi´s interaction with one of the steemit founders
I've talked with Dan Larimer quite regularly over the last few years in Mumble sessions etc. His thinking is constantly evolving and being refined by experimentation. When was the last time you talked to Satoshi? (or has he ascended to Heaven now, having given mankind the Final Solution?)
What does you or me talking to satoshi have to to with someone that calls themself byte MASTER talking to satoshi. The truth is the truth and it is there in print. Regardless of whatever pump and dump scheme or fetish to USD pegging systems mister master has , "If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry." DAMN SON
altcoin"sin"............. Are you a True Believer? Hallelujah Brother!
no altcoins.in
Um hello. I do not think you read this right at all. :s
Read it as is
"If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry."
DAMN SON